Vortech supercharger

[2forme]

Was that SAE or STD corrected numbers?

[Amadeus]

What are your other mods? Did you upgrade your exhaust?

[2forme]

Actually, his results are in line with what Perrin got. 240whp on a DynaPack is around 215whp on a DynoJet. So it's well within the margin of error. I am waiting for a dyno graph.

[Opposed]

Originally Posted by 2forme

Actually, his results are in line with what Perrin got. 240whp on a DynaPack is around 215whp on a DynoJet. So it's well within the margin of error. I am waiting for a dyno graph.

One thing to consider is that Perrin's stock baseline is on par with other Dynojet baselines...Im sure his DynoPack reads similar to a Dynojet. I have seen DynoPacks read all over the place. The only reason these numbers are a tad low is his high altitude location.

[2forme]

Originally Posted by Opposed

The only thing I question about Perrin's numbers is that his stock baseline is on par with other Dynojet baselines...

Yea, I've seen stock dynos ranging from 135-170. What was Perrin's baseline?

[Opposed]

Originally Posted by 2forme

Yea, I've seen stock dynos ranging from 135-170. What was Perrin's baseline?

His baseline was 164 whp, 135 wtq.

[2forme]

Originally Posted by Opposed

His baseline was 164 whp, 135 wtq.

Maybe its a similar dyno to that of his "avo vs vortech"

[Pete]

I gotta say, this is a bit lower than I expected after correction. Not comforting to those of us waiting on delivery of the kit. There must be something else going on?

You have mentioned a few times that it feels a lot faster to you though. I wonder what your baseline would have been on that dyno.

Do you have an after market exhaust or other mods?

I'd like to see your graph when you can post it Skatery, thanks for continuing to update the thread!

[Opposed]

Originally Posted by Pete

I gotta say, this is a bit lower than I expected after correction. Not comforting to those of us waiting on delivery of the kit. There must be something else going on?

You have mentioned a few times that it feels a lot faster to you though. I wonder what your baseline would have been on that dyno.

Do you have an after market exhaust or other mods?

I'd like to see your graph when you can post it Skatery, thanks for continuing to update the thread!

He is a mile high plus elevation in Colorado. Most likely the reason for the lower numbers.

[2forme]

Originally Posted by Opposed

He is a mile high plus elevation in Colorado. Most likely the reason for the lower numbers.

The numbers were corrected. I'm actually not surprised at the numbers considering the selling dynos were on dynapacks.

[skatery1989]

I wish I would have done a baseline but didn't. On the 26th I am going back up for the E-85 tune. There is also going to be a stock BRZ going to ask him to baseline that one before he tunes it. I have Perrin cat-less front pipe over pipe and non-resonated cat back. also have their oil cooler. That is it as for as performance besides the supercharger. I am also running 245/40/18 in the rear and 225/40/18 in the front seen someone asked that earlier. The car is without a doubt faster. And you can feel the torque that it gains. There is a guy here that said his came in at 160 corrected. I think he said uncorrected he was at like 123. Different dyno tho. I was expecting to be somewhere around 220HP and 165TQ because of the altitude. I am happy with the results. I test about 8 different maps last night and you'll see there is change between each map this is also on 91 octane. Jeff has the timing turn down on these maps because it 91 octane. I am also looking to keep this as safe as possible and after looking through the logs everything look good.
Heres the dyno sheets.
This was the best pull with the highest numbers.

Heres most of the runs we did.

Heres boost and AFR.

Hope this helps you guys out I cant say anything but positive thing about this kit I am extremely happy with it, and the work both companies have put into it.
Heres the link to the video.

[Pete]

Looks like your whp levels off around 6200 rpm, I don't see that on Jeff's graphs. Maybe due to pulling timings for 91 octane + altitude?

[Opposed]

Originally Posted by 2forme

The numbers were corrected. I'm actually not surprised at the numbers considering the selling dynos were on dynapacks.

Well now this makes sense. His dyno was done on a Dyno Dynamics, those read pretty low...

[skatery1989]

Originally Posted by Opposed

Well now this makes sense. His dyno was done on a Dyno Dynamics, those read pretty low...

Ya should have threw that in there.