|
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-16-2012, 03:09 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S Asphalt
Location: SoCal
Posts: 51
Thanks: 12
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
You need to read this: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...ht=transmition
Dont let anyone tell you what to buy! This car is great in both AT and MT. Faster is just a term throwing around based on numbers, not everyone is prefect at shifting when they drive MT, while paddle shifting is very accurate and can shift way faster than any MT. Anyhow if you commute 30-60 miles a day, having an AT is probably more plausible plus it save more gas >>$5 dollars a gallon now just keep that in mind when you decide. |
10-16-2012, 07:39 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
IMO, no sports car should even be offered as automatics. Part of the fun of a sports car is feeling everything.
As for the limitations, remember that a torque converter will always be absorbing some power until it's locked at highway cruising speed. That means the drivetrain losses are higher so you'll need to make more power just to be as fast, even if the auto shifts faster than a person can.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
The Following User Says Thank You to wparsons For This Useful Post: | 2forme (10-16-2012) |
10-16-2012, 07:44 AM | #31 |
Member
|
Greetings,
I purchased a 2013 FR – S few weeks back and can say I have had it out for more than a test drive like most that have posted . This is my first AT trans car since my 85 BMW 325e back in the day and my last few vehicle options were 06 Cooper S with MT6 , 09 WRX MT5, 06 Forester XT with 08 STI Mt6 swap, 2011 TDI Gold MT6, ALL wonderful cars to drive but since I’m getting old I chose the AT6 and I do not regret it at all. I’m not a drifter so I can care less about being able to kick the rear out and shifting the weight with the clutch I would rather hit some nice twisty country roads and enjoy the drive this gives that feeling and you just can’t do that in a 400hp Forester. In manual mode there is really nothing you can’t do with this AT6 that you couldn’t do in my past (FWD MT) cars except I feel I can concentrate more on my actual driving. . And the MPG I can hit 41mpg with cruise at to 55mph. WIN!!!! . I did have a short conversation with Paul at P&L motorsports and his personal car he drives is a AT6 turbo he stated at the time he was making 408whp and had been to the drag strip multiple times running 11.8 on street tires and multiple road course days. He had said the trans just keeps going with no issues except it started to shift a bit slower when over 390 WHP. His exact words were “I beat the hell out of it!!!!!!” This defiantly made me smile. I’m only trying to say the AT trans is a great choice if this is something you are into it has more of a video game feel though that doesn’t bother me. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvy5Rkl0lkk&list=UUCA-EN8Utp90rOrOU5tXszQ&index=5&feature=plcp"]P&L Motorsports - 2013 BRZ / FR-S Stage 1 Turbo Kit - YouTube[/ame] |
10-16-2012, 07:49 AM | #32 |
Reverse Burnouts
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 Argento FRS
Location: dallas!!!
Posts: 2,894
Thanks: 707
Thanked 1,257 Times in 592 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
the turbo kit for the AT held 300+whp without breaking anything, the MT needed a clutch replacement, youll spend less time out of boost in the AT because of the shift times plus longer gears would be beneficial since you have more tq with a turbo/sc
__________________
2000 Carbon Blue Toyota Celica GTS 152000 miles (wont forget you) 2013 Argento Scion FR-S 2011 Infiniti G37x |
10-16-2012, 09:37 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Firestorm Red FR-S
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 271
Thanks: 5
Thanked 120 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Some people should stick with auto. If you've never tracked a car or driven a manual regularly your not going to enjoy driving for a few months while you get used to it. Within a week you'll be able to drive it but eventually it becomes instinctive.
|
10-16-2012, 09:53 AM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2015 GTI
Location: OH, TX, IL
Posts: 165
Thanks: 5
Thanked 72 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Torque Converter automatics have always been extremely strong when built. This is due to the planetary gears. However... at the same time... a manual has less heat to worry about. If you burn the clutch, then a new one is a lot cheaper than burning out the clutch packs on an auto. All comes down to what the use of the car is for and the drivers preference. If it were me (assuming that I was doing significant work to it)... I'd get a manual. That's assuming significant work... However, once you hit a certain point, it's probably better to have an auto. ^^ This
__________________
2013 GTI - Gone
2015 GTI |
|
10-16-2012, 10:08 AM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2015 GTI
Location: OH, TX, IL
Posts: 165
Thanks: 5
Thanked 72 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Also.... due to the fluid coupling... you will get torque multiplication for launching. Not that I am advocating an AT over a MT but... The LFA is auto. The IS-F is auto. The GTR is auto (though DCT). Technology is driving manufacturers down towards the auto. Best example is when I had a miata for a little bit. Some people at my university were confused as to why it had 3 pedals. The manual is dying out (unfortunately). Personally... if I had a car dedicated to track use, it would probably/most likely be a manual. I am not going to make crazy power. Nor can I afford a GTR/evo/etc. Therefore, it would be better to have a manual. Assuming I couldn't have a dedicated track car... then the real questions are... 1) How much driving do I do each week? 2) How "lazy" am I when I drive around town? 3) What is my "track to Daily driving" ratio? 4) How much do I care about fuel economy? These 4 questions are the ones that I look at when shopping around. (more so 1, 3, 4). While I would love to track my car every weekend, it is not possible. It all depends on how you will drive it and what you want. Speaking theoretically... there is probably not going to many things that will not be avaialble for the automatic and the manual version.
__________________
2013 GTI - Gone
2015 GTI |
|
10-16-2012, 08:16 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Toronto
Posts: 292
Thanks: 17
Thanked 76 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
10-16-2012, 11:23 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2014 Jeep Wrangler RubiconX
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 1,282
Thanks: 110
Thanked 292 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
OP, good advice from wlfpck there in post 35.... Most people on this forum will lean toward and tell you to get the MT... but it is your car and you need to drive and live with it so get what you want based on very most important criteria to you.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Captain Insano For This Useful Post: | einzlr (10-17-2012) |
10-16-2012, 11:32 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2008 Honda Fit Vivid Blue Pearl
Location: Tempe Arizona
Posts: 140
Thanks: 12
Thanked 75 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The auto is great. I just feel far more in touch with a vehicle if I'm the one shifting. If I'm not doing that the only purpose of me behind the wheel is to keep it not pointed at trees.
|
10-17-2012, 08:00 AM | #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2014 Jeep Wrangler RubiconX
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 1,282
Thanks: 110
Thanked 292 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
10-17-2012, 08:11 AM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion Frs(Scarlet)
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 907
Thanks: 172
Thanked 386 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've seen the same but i used the numbers from the same magazine because i went out to find the best numbers for both a man and auto the difference would really still be the same. Only thing i've noticed about certain car magazines is that they state the octane on the car is 91 so if they put 93 would their results be even better?
|
10-17-2012, 08:38 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (Whiteout) Manual
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 247
Thanks: 73
Thanked 164 Times in 72 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Once you go from stick to auto, you instantly realize how many things you've taken for granted all this time. It's the same feeling when you go from a car to a motorcycle.
|
10-17-2012, 09:02 AM | #42 |
The Answer
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Mazda 2
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 1,233
Thanks: 488
Thanked 661 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The only problem with getting an auto is the risk of regretting later on you didn't get a manual. However I heard good stuff about the automatic so get the auto if you're comfortable with.
Anyway, all the great sports car comes with automatic paddle shifters nowadays, GT-R, lambos, ferraris, etc… so don't feel bad about it |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BRZ standard v premium seats. | AUmarvin | AUSTRALIA | 13 | 10-16-2012 05:59 AM |
I don't think Bespoke is standard. | FRSDREAMER | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 6 | 04-20-2012 01:36 AM |
LSD Standard? | tankd0g | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 39 | 04-11-2012 02:39 AM |
FR-S Standard Features | zAnSh1n | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 182 | 04-04-2012 04:23 PM |