follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting

Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting What these cars were built for!

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-19-2012, 09:44 AM   #15
Sccabrz192
Detroit Region, MI
 
Sccabrz192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 13 Volt, 02 WRX
Location: Some Abandoned Slab of Concrete
Posts: 738
Thanks: 20
Thanked 200 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Trying to add SOME useful information to this otherwise useless thread...

Even though removing trunk junk and going to a track pipe from the OE cat-back DOES minutely move the CoG forward in vehicle (it's a 56/44 weight balance BTW, not "near perfect"... well, unless you come from the typically nose heavy land of FWD or AWD). you do get a 2 fold benefit from 1)reduced overall vehicle weight and 2)reduced Moment of Inertia which, from a road car perspective, outweighs the negative aspect of moving the CoG slightly in the wrong direction.

And if you are THAT worried about upsetting the balance... take out the junk and run a full tank of gas. the fuel tank is inboard of all the weight you reduced (still improving RMoI) and a full tank reduces slosh which is unfavorable in transitions.
Sccabrz192 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sccabrz192 For This Useful Post:
mla163 (09-19-2012)
Old 09-19-2012, 09:58 AM   #16
brzperformance.net
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: forester XT, 04 STi, Sequoia
Location: United States
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZP Installs View Post
I agree not corner balancing a car with coils can make it handle worse than stock.

-Mike Paisan


11+ Years Maintaining, Modifying and Educating TriState Subaru Enthusiasts.
Call directly as We carry almost every manufacturer now, so before you buy parts call us.

Like us on Facebook! | E-mail: sales@azpinstalls.com | 725 Fairfield Ave | Kenilworth, NJ 07033 | 908.248.AZP1 (2971) | T-1 Certified Amsoil Direct Jobber |AIM: AZP Installs
"Race Tested, Enthusiast Approved!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sccabrz192 View Post
Trying to add SOME useful information to this otherwise useless thread...

Even though removing trunk junk and going to a track pipe from the OE cat-back DOES minutely move the CoG forward in vehicle (it's a 56/44 weight balance BTW, not "near perfect"... well, unless you come from the typically nose heavy land of FWD or AWD). you do get a 2 fold benefit from 1)reduced overall vehicle weight and 2)reduced Moment of Inertia which, from a road car perspective, outweighs the negative aspect of moving the CoG slightly in the wrong direction.

And if you are THAT worried about upsetting the balance... take out the junk and run a full tank of gas. the fuel tank is inboard of all the weight you reduced (still improving RMoI) and a full tank reduces slosh which is unfavorable in transitions.

so In otherwords. don't just start doing shit thinking its going to improve over the OEM quality.

Do it properly.
brzperformance.net is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 10:07 AM   #17
brzperformance.net
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: forester XT, 04 STi, Sequoia
Location: United States
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
56/44 is pretty damn close to 50/50 and I do come from AWD. currently own a sti, had a few wrx's, another sti, and a few evos. Some were straight line prepped, some were auto X prepped. and pulling the spare tire and removing a snorkel never aided any benefit to be worth my time.
brzperformance.net is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 10:20 AM   #18
Propaganda
Diamonds & Cadillacs
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: '13 fr-s, 1974 911s
Location: Internet
Posts: 392
Thanks: 162
Thanked 157 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by brzperformance.net View Post
pulling the spare tire and removing a snorkel never aided any benefit to be worth my time.
Because that what....adds up to 50lbs? Yes in theory, a lighter car should run a faster time, but 9 times out of 10 it won't if there isn't a skilled enough driver behind the wheel. The junk in the trunk is such a miniscule amount of weight, comparatively.

That being said, some of my friends that have old miatas need to have someone ride along (ADDING 120+lbs depending on who), because it helps to better balance the car and they can run faster times. It doesn't work all the time, but sometimes it's needed (depending on the course).


Also, you're saying that if I fold the rear seats down, it'll help move the CoG lower and make my car more balanced? (sorry, I had to)
Propaganda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 11:13 AM   #19
mla163
Overthinking it
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: BRZ in CS
Location: DC
Posts: 271
Thanks: 27
Thanked 81 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Propaganda View Post
Also, you're saying that if I fold the rear seats down, it'll help move the CoG lower and make my car more balanced? (sorry, I had to)
Actually, I know a lot of national level drivers that will do this. The benefits are miniscule, but it's a step in the the right direction. The same way that a few lbs of weight savings may not be directly measurable in lap times but is the right move. Ounces add up to pounds and that has a huge impact on a low power car like this one.
mla163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 11:19 AM   #20
track_warrior
Track Junkie
 
track_warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Faster than the Stig!
Location: TX
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 530
Thanked 770 Times in 363 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thats why we corner balance and align!! I feel a huge difference at the track with the light weight reduction i have done to my car, it feels more planted and agile and i feel i have a faster corner exit speed as well. Light weight will always be a good thing no matter how you do it imo.


__________________
Compensating a heavy car with horsepower is like giving an alcoholic cocaine to sober him up...
track_warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 12:56 PM   #21
ABQautoxer
Senior Member
 
ABQautoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2021 Supra / 2022 Tundra
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 659
Thanks: 60
Thanked 197 Times in 141 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It's ok not knowing things, especially in the quirky autocross world were we'd take a poor balanced car weight wise front to rear if it means we can remove 50-100lbs every time. It's not ok to try to give advise not understanding this things and potentially misinforming those that don't know what you are saying is wrong.
__________________
TomR
ABQautoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 03:12 PM   #22
Element Tuning
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Hydra EMS Powered FRS Raven Black
Location: Maryland
Posts: 839
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1,021 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamal View Post
That's what I've been saying this whole time!
I know I'm very unconventional sometimes. Can't be afraid to try something unusual in the quest for speed.

Ok time to make this thread useful. Here's what I did to upset the balance of my car. I will warn you however I dropped 8 seconds a lap so don't try this unless you want to go faster!

Here is the weight of the stuff I removed but keep in mind I may have added substantial weight with bigger wheels and tires, and the suspension could be slightly heavier (never had a chance to weight them but can tell when installing).

OEM FT86 front caliper + bracket + pads = 13.4 lbs. OEM Rotor 17lbs = 30.4 lbs
VS.
OEM STI Brembo Caliper + Pads = 13.6 lbs. Plus DBA front rotors 19.5 lbs = 33.1 lbs (gained +2.7)
OEM battery= 29.6 lbs.( The Battery I used PC680 weighs less than 15 pounds) so saved 14.6 lbs
Rear seat bases =6.2 lbs.
Rear seat back (1-piece)= 15.0 lbs.
OEM spare tire with liner foam= 25.8 lbs.
Front floor mats= 2.4 lbs.
Rear floor mats= 0.8 lbs
Cup holder insert= 0.4 lbs
OEM trunk tools, jack, tow hook= 5.8 lbs.
OEM trunk rug/liner mat= 2.4 lbs.
Owner's Manual= 2.8 lbs.
OEM catback exhaust =38.4lbs (had a small dump pipe about 5 lbs)

Dropped -106.9 lbs easily.

Oh I also removed the rear sway bar but not sure what that weighs.
Element Tuning is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Element Tuning For This Useful Post:
AJUSA.com (09-19-2012), kwood9000 (09-19-2012), Scooby South (09-19-2012)
Old 09-19-2012, 05:00 PM   #23
rice_classic
Senior Member
 
rice_classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Nevermorange FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,175
Thanks: 758
Thanked 4,213 Times in 1,809 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by brzperformance.net View Post
Are you assuming that every registered user is building a professional race car?
Quote:
Originally Posted by brzperformance.net View Post
Overall, it sounds like everone is building a straight race car and no one is driving them on the street.
You got it wrong twice.

If it's being driven on the street IT IS NOT A RACE CAR, IT IS A STREET CAR. It is possible to have a street legal race car and it is possible to have a race-legal street car, but BOTH will have a roll cage, a fire suppression system, a racing seat with a seat-back brace (or FIA homologated seat), SFI legal 5pt or 6pt belts and a window net.
A race car is something that is specific to racing. Something that competes in sanctioned racing events, something that is built to a specific rule set for a specific class.

People aren't building "professional" race cars... they're building "actual" race cars... you know, cars that actually fit that definition.

What the car is designed for (either by the manufacturer or the owner) is what defines it.

Rally car: (can a rally car be considered a race car?... Of course, because it is but RALLY is a specific kind of sanctioned racing).



Race Car:



STREET CAR (and a good looking subbie I might add!)


rice_classic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 05:14 PM   #24
ftc~brz
Done
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: WRB BRZ
Location: MD
Posts: 1,875
Thanks: 9,948
Thanked 4,936 Times in 2,101 Posts
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 7 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by brzperformance.net View Post
Overall, it sounds like everone is building a straight race car and no one is driving them on the street.

I'm leaving mine the way I got it, in the service bay at the dealership....BAAWHHAHAHA

I slay me!
ftc~brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2012, 05:16 AM   #25
gmookher
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: VortechSC,BorlaEL,Perrin,GCRace
Location: HighHeatHighAltitudeAZ,USA
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 458
Thanked 669 Times in 394 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Element Tuning View Post
I know I'm very unconventional sometimes. Can't be afraid to try something unusual in the quest for speed.

Ok time to make this thread useful. Here's what I did to upset the balance of my car. I will warn you however I dropped 8 seconds a lap so don't try this unless you want to go faster!

Here is the weight of the stuff I removed but keep in mind I may have added substantial weight with bigger wheels and tires, and the suspension could be slightly heavier (never had a chance to weight them but can tell when installing).

OEM FT86 front caliper + bracket + pads = 13.4 lbs. OEM Rotor 17lbs = 30.4 lbs
VS.
OEM STI Brembo Caliper + Pads = 13.6 lbs. Plus DBA front rotors 19.5 lbs = 33.1 lbs (gained +2.7)
OEM battery= 29.6 lbs.( The Battery I used PC680 weighs less than 15 pounds) so saved 14.6 lbs
Rear seat bases =6.2 lbs.
Rear seat back (1-piece)= 15.0 lbs.
OEM spare tire with liner foam= 25.8 lbs.
Front floor mats= 2.4 lbs.
Rear floor mats= 0.8 lbs
Cup holder insert= 0.4 lbs
OEM trunk tools, jack, tow hook= 5.8 lbs.
OEM trunk rug/liner mat= 2.4 lbs.
Owner's Manual= 2.8 lbs.
OEM catback exhaust =38.4lbs (had a small dump pipe about 5 lbs)

Dropped -106.9 lbs easily.

Oh I also removed the rear sway bar but not sure what that weighs.
how is handling without a rear sway?
gmookher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gmookher For This Useful Post:
Grishbok (09-20-2012)
Old 09-20-2012, 11:42 AM   #26
diirk
Senior Member
 
diirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 4Runner
Location: N. Utah
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 684
Thanked 392 Times in 252 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ftc~brz View Post
I'm leaving mine the way I got it, in the service bay at the dealership....BAAWHHAHAHA

I slay me!
I just wanted to say that I like your sig. Almost bought that shirt, I opted for the "I want a tattooed president" shirt instead.
__________________
diirk

waiting on a Neptune Premium MT
diirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2012, 11:55 AM   #27
Propaganda
Diamonds & Cadillacs
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: '13 fr-s, 1974 911s
Location: Internet
Posts: 392
Thanks: 162
Thanked 157 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmookher View Post
how is handling without a rear sway?
I know almost all of my friends that autocross with the early gen. miatas took theirs out because it does handle better (and they have ran faster times to prove it). But I'd like to know how it is for the toyobarus, as well!
Propaganda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2012, 12:19 PM   #28
Draco-REX
Corner Junkie
 
Draco-REX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 11 STI, 99 RS
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,521 Times in 702 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Draco-REX is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Draco-REX For This Useful Post:
Propaganda (09-20-2012), Racecomp Engineering (09-20-2012)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phil's Accelerated Performance Turbo Auto FRS Thread Philly Forced Induction 131 05-14-2013 11:23 AM
Jm racing auto SF-FRS User/Vendor/Sponsor Reviews, Feedback, Comments 8 09-28-2012 11:04 AM
Fortune Auto vs BC Racing D1cker Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 14 09-11-2012 11:18 AM
NW Shop Review: AR Auto Service/Adrenalin Racing (Lake Oswego OR) DarrenDriven Northwest 0 06-04-2012 01:57 PM
Road racing events? #87 Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 8 05-26-2011 10:19 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.