Expert prognosis for the planet

[Unplugem]

Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0

Because misinformation can be effective against feeble minds, clearly. Plus, there is all types of well made misinformation with deepfakes, photoshopped pictures, stitched together videos, and blatant misconceptions of facts, etc. that would fool anyone who didn't do fact checking. This was the case of the misinformation you posted of the "laser beam" hitting Maui, which was a time lapse of a rocket launch from California, or the "video evidence" of the moon landing being faked, which was a well-made video stitching pieces of movie clips edited with real images to look authentic, or the "video evidence" of the YouTuber trying to pick apart the moon landing from India, falsely saying that a picture of the earth from the perspective orbiting the moon was a picture on the lunar surface.

Fact checking is there because misinformation causes harm.

The "fact checkers" are the folks misinforming you; they are all a bunch of paid off shills. The fires in Paradise, CA and Maui were the result of DEWs.

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Unplugem

It would be impossible for more than two "gravity generating spheres" to exist in the same system. It's the three body problem, research it. As soon as a third "gravity generating object" is added to the system, the whole system becomes unpredictable and devolves into absolute chaos. The three body problem is proof in itself, that the earth, sun, and moon cannot coexist in a predictable system; once you add in other "planets," it only becomes more impossible.

It feels like you are quoting math well over your head here. Ok that was a pun. I'll attempt to explain based on a quick skim of the Wikipedia article.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem#:~:text=In%20physics%20and%20classica l%20mechanics,Newton's%20law%20of%20universal%20gr avitation.

It refers to a lack of "CLOSED" mathematical solution to how gravity acts on 3 or more bodies in space. That is because with 3 or more objects, the number of uncontrolled variables outpaces the number of equations we can use to solve for them. However, using observations of the real universe Newton and the following mathematicians were able to determine a closed set of equations between two objects.

There are a few ways to accurately predict the motion of multiple bodies in space using those closed solutions we do have for 2 body systems. The one I am most familiar with is numerical analysis. If you iterate equations you know over a sufficiently small step size in time, for example, you can walk forward step by step with reasonably accurate predictions. The smaller the step, the more accurate the predicted paths. Computers are really good at this.

Most high-accuracy aerodynamics is done with numerical analysis too. There isn't a closed solution to predict the airflow over an arbitrary shape. Up until modern computing, it was really just guess and test, and even modern CFD (computational fluid dynamics) isn't perfect. Thats why wind tunnels are still so important. That's why the Wrights watched birds, because evolution had millions of years to guess and check for them.

You see airplanes and birds fly every day. Just because there's no "closed mathematical solution" to explain exactly how the airflow that keeps them up works, doesn't mean it isn't happening.

[Ultramaroon]

[Unplugem]

Originally Posted by Spuds

It feels like you are quoting math well over your head here. Ok that was a pun. I'll attempt to explain based on a quick skim of the Wikipedia article.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem#:~:text=In%20physics%20and%20classica l%20mechanics,Newton's%20law%20of%20universal%20gr avitation.

It refers to a lack of "CLOSED" mathematical solution to how gravity acts on 3 or more bodies in space. That is because with 3 or more objects, the number of uncontrolled variables outpaces the number of equations we can use to solve for them. However, using observations of the real universe Newton and the following mathematicians were able to determine a closed set of equations between two objects.
If this gravitational force really existed, it itself would not allow the formation of the proposed solar system... Three body problem.

There are a few ways to accurately predict the motion of multiple bodies in space using those closed solutions we do have for 2 body systems. The one I am most familiar with is numerical analysis. If you iterate equations you know over a sufficiently small step size in time, for example, you can walk forward step by step with reasonably accurate predictions. The smaller the step, the more accurate the predicted paths. Computers are really good at this.

Most high-accuracy aerodynamics is done with numerical analysis too. There isn't a closed solution to predict the airflow over an arbitrary shape. Up until modern computing, it was really just guess and test, and even modern CFD (computational fluid dynamics) isn't perfect. Thats why wind tunnels are still so important. That's why the Wrights watched birds, because evolution had millions of years to guess and check for them.

You see airplanes and birds fly every day. Just because there's no "closed mathematical solution" to explain exactly how the airflow that keeps them up works, doesn't mean it isn't happening.

"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."
-Nikola Tesla





The three body problem cannot be solved because it doesn't exist in reality. It's all theoretical and reverse engineered, making no factual sense.
Isaac Newton was a Kabbalist, who practiced alchemy and mysticism. All of his "theories" are based in science fiction.
The three body problem was cooked up because they knew they had no factual model of the solar system that could prove the big bang theory. The three body problem was created in an attempt to end the debate as "inconclusive." The problem is the three body problem is still a loose end to this day and cannot be solved because it is make believe. Your explanation of the three body problem is nonsense, as a two body problem cannot be carried over into the three body problem; Newton designed it to not be compatible because it is utter nonsense.
If this gravitational force really existed, it itself would not allow the formation of the proposed solar system... Three body problem.

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Unplugem

Your explanation of the three body problem is nonsense, as a two body problem cannot be carried over into the three body problem; Newton designed it to not be compatible because it is utter nonsense.

Well, you certainly know a lot about nonsense.

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon

I feel attacked lol. Because it would be too simple.

Edit: Also, I figured it was more interesting to anyone who will actually read it. I'm not going to spend that kind of time just on someone who just wants to spam.

[Unplugem]

Originally Posted by Spuds

Well, you certainly know a lot about nonsense.

Speaking of nonsense...

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Unplugem

If this gravitational force really existed, it itself would not allow the formation of the proposed solar system... Three body problem.

I see you added this part. That's a mistake on your part lol.

Why not? What about gravity prevents the solar system forming?

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Unplugem

Speaking of nonsense...

I may or may not belong to a religion. I purposely don't share because it's not that kind of forum.

I mean you are the one obsessed with Lucifer/Satan. If that's your thing, that's great, I don't judge.

[Irace86.2.0]

Originally Posted by Unplugem

The "fact checkers" are the folks misinforming you; they are all a bunch of paid off shills. The fires in Paradise, CA and Maui were the result of DEWs.

Trees have evolved for millions of years to avoid burning. They can be wet, water soaked logs. Ever tried to start a fire with a wet log?

Homes on the other hand are dry with plenty of fuel (natural gas) and oil based products in them that burn well.

[Irace86.2.0]

Originally Posted by Unplugem

Speaking of nonsense...

I’m an atheist.

Better that than the belief that something that we know nothing about and made up was around forever and decided to snap its hands and make stuff like making a video game. You must believe this is a simulation (ever heard of that theory), except you worship the AI or person that made this simulation. You’re like a Christopher Nolan (director) super stalker fan, except you don’t actually know the director; you just think you do.

[Irace86.2.0]

Unplugem at his computer.

[Dadhawk]

Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0

You must believe this is a simulation (ever heard of that theory), except you worship the AI or person that made this simulation.

Of course, like creationism and the Big Bang, that doesn't really get to the "root coase" either. I firmly am in the "Who the hell knows but it seems real enough to me" camp.

[blsfrs]

It could be that we are controlled by mycelium. It's everywhere. Underground, on our skin, in our intestines. It could even be in our brains. Masons could be bipedal mycelium beings walking among us. Think about it!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ism-is-fungus/