Vacci-Nation [CLOSED DUE TO DISRESPECTFUL, INSULTING, POLITICAL POSTS

[Lantanafrs2]

Originally Posted by wbradley

And all we have here is Auston Matthews on ice.

On a bright note, his partner in crime is Mitch Marner, and his parents live just 5 doors down from me.

Looks like a potential super spreader event to me.

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Cdc guidance is useless. It may be okay to not wear a mask outdoors if you're around family members who've been vaccinated lol. When this is over some people will deserve a reckoning

Which CDC guidance are you referring to? Please be specific. There are a lot of trolls pretending to be "journalists" making stuff up and reporting it as fact. When you post a random opinion on some unidentifiable event without a source, it really looks like you are either being fed misinformation or are one of said trolls. If you provide a source of this information on which you have an opinion, then we can have an actual discussion.

[weederr33]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Cdc guidance is useless. It may be okay to not wear a mask outdoors if you're around family members who've been vaccinated lol. When this is over some people will deserve a reckoning

Oh yes... there will be plenty who need a reckoning, my friend. And not just pro-COVID countermeasure individuals.

[Ultramaroon]

[Capt Spaulding]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Cdc guidance is useless. It may be okay to not wear a mask outdoors if you're around family members who've been vaccinated lol. When this is over some people will deserve a reckoning

I am unsure what you are talking about. Which CDC guidance, what does maskless interaction with other vaccinated individuals have to do with it, and who do you think is ripe for a reckoning? I have a number of candidates for the last one, but your post raises more questions than it answers.

[Lantanafrs2]

Originally Posted by Capt Spaulding

I am unsure what you are talking about. Which CDC guidance, what does maskless interaction with other vaccinated individuals have to do with it, and who do you think is ripe for a reckoning? I have a number of candidates for the last one, but your post raises more questions than it answers.

Those who claimed knowledge when they really didn't know their ass from their elbows. Imo there are examples of this on both sides of the ideological fence.

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Those who claimed knowledge when they really didn't know their ass from their elbows. Imo there are examples of this on both sides of the ideological fence.

Who, when where?

[spike021]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Those who claimed knowledge when they really didn't know their ass from their elbows. Imo there are examples of this on both sides of the ideological fence.

I feel like you're constantly on the precipice of making some kind of valid point, but you consistently, in multiple posts, just beat around the bush and don't provide sources/evidence for your thoughts.

I don't know if it's because you lack them or aren't sure enough of them that they are strong enough to support your argument, or what.

You'll post regardless, of course, and that is your right. But honestly it'd serve our discussion way better if you could at least try to pull supporting claims/evidence in your comments rather than leaving them out.

[Lantanafrs2]

Originally Posted by spike021

I feel like you're constantly on the precipice of making some kind of valid point, but you consistently, in multiple posts, just beat around the bush and don't provide sources/evidence for your thoughts.

I don't know if it's because you lack them or aren't sure enough of them that they are strong enough to support your argument, or what.

You'll post regardless, of course, and that is your right. But honestly it'd serve our discussion way better if you could at least try to pull supporting claims/evidence in your comments rather than leaving them out.

I actually agree with you. I should just describe the media and political influencers who minimized the pandemic in the first place yet jumped the line to be vaccinated or those who induced paranoia amongst their followers with now disproven ideas about how covid is transmitted in the first place.

My uneducated opinion is that the pandemic will be kept alive in the media and political matrix long after its actually gone because its become a click bait cash cow for idiot sjws who want to wear rainbow masks forever and the idiots who wish to brand any of those who are honestly safety minded as idiot sjws.

[Dadhawk]

Originally Posted by Capt Spaulding

I am unsure what you are talking about. Which CDC guidance, what does maskless interaction with other vaccinated individuals have to do with it, and who do you think is ripe for a reckoning? I have a number of candidates for the last one, but your post raises more questions than it answers.

I believe its a reference to guideance provided today for fully vaccinated individuals.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...-guidance.html

[ScoobsMcGee]

Stumbled in here after seeing another thread saying it should be deleted. I have nothing to contribute, so here's some very narrow niche humor.


.

[spike021]

Originally Posted by ScoobsMcGee

Stumbled in here after seeing another thread saying it should be deleted. I have nothing to contribute, so here's some very narrow niche humor.


.

lol saw that earlier too

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Cdc guidance is useless. It may be okay to not wear a mask outdoors if you're around family members who've been vaccinated lol. When this is over some people will deserve a reckoning

Originally Posted by Dadhawk

I believe its a reference to guideance provided today for fully vaccinated individuals.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...-guidance.html

So wait, is Lantanafrs2 trying to say the new cdc guidelines are over restrictive or under restrictive? I don't think they have changed for unvaccinated individuals have they?

[Spuds]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

I actually agree with you. I should just describe the media and political influencers who minimized the pandemic in the first place yet jumped the line to be vaccinated or those who induced paranoia amongst their followers with now disproven ideas about how covid is transmitted in the first place.

My uneducated opinion is that the pandemic will be kept alive in the media and political matrix long after its actually gone because its become a click bait cash cow for idiot sjws who want to wear rainbow masks forever and the idiots who wish to brand any of those who are honestly safety minded as idiot sjws.

I still have no idea what you are referring to in the first paragraph. I don't think there are a whole lot of people that want to wear masks forever but there are indeed some crazies out there, like conspiracy theorists.

However, if you are referring to the CDC updating it's guidance as time goes on, I'll have to disagree with that being the wrong thing to do. I personally want the latest data to make the best decision at any given time. If they put out bad guidance at first, but didn't update it upon seeing data contrary to their predictions, wouldn't that be worse?

If that is not what you are referring to, perhaps being more specific will let us understand your point better?