TOYOTA GAZOO Racing Presents World Debut of the New JDM GR 86 (Second Gen 86)!

[Kiske]

Originally Posted by beltax90

.

I wonder how long until the aftermarket replaces the stick-on quarter panel trim with a piece that wraps around the whole wheel arch. Wide body yo!

[Kronk]

[nikitopo]

Not sure what is the point to get these high and low angle shots with the big depth distortion. I guess it started with this silly photo of GR86.

[Kronk]

Originally Posted by nikitopo

Not sure what is the point to get these high and low angle shots with the big depth distortion. I guess it started with this silly photo of GR86.

I think with wide angle (not extreme) is more like it.
Normal focal length gives you a different perceptions than those of your eyes.

You have a prime example with the last Mazda 3: it’s c pillar seemed ugly by normal photo but you had another perception by live view.

If you stay in front of the car at the distance of your photo, you have a wide perception of the hood and pushed depth by live view, almost like your pic.

[nikitopo]

Originally Posted by Kronk

I think with wide angle (not extreme) is more like it.
Normal focal length gives you a different perceptions than those of your eyes.

You have a prime example with the last Mazda 3: it’s c pillar seemed ugly by normal photo but you had another perception by live view.

If you stay in front of the car at the distance of your photo, you have a wide perception of the hood and pushed depth by live view, almost like your pic.

There isn't that much depth in reality. The engine bay was designed to fit a boxer engine and not an inline 6 cylinder engine.

[Kronk]

Originally Posted by nikitopo

There isn't that much depth in reality. The engine bay was designed to fit a boxer engine and not an inline 6 cylinder engine.

“Almost”, not the same, our brain usually corrects the distortion.

“ What focal length is equivalent to the human eye?

To summarize, though, one commonly quoted focal length of the eye is 17mm (this is calculated from the Optometric diopter value). The more commonly accepted value, however, is 22mm to 24mm (calculated from physical refraction in the eye).”

[StE92ve]

Originally Posted by Kronk

No offense to Kronk, but the quality of this video has to be one of the worst I've ever seen. Hopefully whoever recorded it doesn't have any aspirations of winning an Oscar.

[Quentin]

I thought the video was great. It showed all those details that I normally don’t see until I can get up close and personal with a car. I especially liked the view down onto the trunk lid. Where the quarter panels stop early, we could see the top of the tailllight housing and the depth reminds me of the GR Yaris.

[Kronk]

Originally Posted by Quentin

I thought the video was great. It showed all those details that I normally don’t see until I can get up close and personal with a car. I especially liked the view down onto the trunk lid. Where the quarter panels stop early, we could see the top of the tailllight housing and the depth reminds me of the GR Yaris.

Here the same. I perceive professional videos too fake.

I thank the author, especially in this moment of lack of amateur video material.

[Kronk]

Is this an orange?
Look at the red in the black circle...

[nikitopo]

[StE92ve]

Originally Posted by Kronk

Is this an orange?
Look at the red in the black circle...

Originally Posted by nikitopo

That definitely looks orange to me, especially in that second video.

[mazeroni]

Looks red in these photos.

[Dadhawk]

Originally Posted by mazeroni

Looks red in these photos.

It's definitely an angle or difference in camera thing. See the GR mat underneath as well. In the first it looks orange and in second one red.