2020 Toyota GR Supra Revealed!

[blackhawkdown]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

Well cousins maybe.

I like it dirty


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Red-86]

Originally Posted by gymratter

He’s right, given how close in price the 2.0 and 3.0 are, I think most folks would kick themselves for not spending the extra and getting the best version of the car. The B58 I6 is so much more engine than the B48 I4.

[vh_supra26]

Originally Posted by Red-86

He’s right, given how close in price the 2.0 and 3.0 are, I think most folks would kick themselves for not spending the extra and getting the best version of the car. The B58 I6 is so much more engine than the B48 I4.

After discounts I think most owners in the States have said the price differences is like $5k+. If I was in the market for a Zupra I would also go with the 3.0. And when it comes to resale; past Z4 that seem to be less desirable and cheaper are the base models.

[Kiske]

Originally Posted by vh_supra26

After discounts I think most owners in the States have said the price differences is like $5k+.

5k from a 2021 2.0 to a 2020 3.0. The 2021 3.0's are still a good 10k difference with most stating they're to be had around 52k otd price.

[gymratter]

Originally Posted by Red-86

He’s right, given how close in price the 2.0 and 3.0 are, I think most folks would kick themselves for not spending the extra and getting the best version of the car. The B58 I6 is so much more engine than the B48 I4.

agree, i think Toyota made a huge mistake by bring that to the US. from what im gathering online dealers are having a hard time moving the 2.0. the only place that seems to be doing ok is CA because of their outrageous pricing/markups.

i think it will only get worst when the Z replacement comes. down the road i have a feeling the 2.0 will turn out just like the NA MK4 turd. no one is going to want one except to do a motor swap.

[vh_supra26]

[blackhawkdown]

As a mkv 3.0 owner, the 2.0 has very little aftermarket support. The resale value of the 2.0 is bad. I highly recommend getting the 3.0 over the 2.0.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mn_ca]

Originally Posted by blackhawkdown

As a mkv 3.0 owner, the 2.0 has very little aftermarket support. The resale value of the 2.0 is bad. I highly recommend getting the 3.0 over the 2.0.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No point of having a 2.0. It's slightly cheaper just to say you bought a damn Supra. For the price, there are many options out there. I wouldn't even consider a 2.0 lol. Should've just kept the 3.0 and have a base and GR with upgrades, whether engine or cosmetic. Fucking Toyota 😆

[ZDan]

Originally Posted by blackhawkdown

As a mkv 3.0 owner, the 2.0 has very little aftermarket support. The resale value of the 2.0 is bad. I highly recommend getting the 3.0 over the 2.0.

Low resale = good argument to buy used if going 2.0.
The drag races above are kind of telling, the 2.0 doesn't exactly get destroyed by the 3.0 and MkIV, not to the expected degree. Granted, not ideal launch conditions but still... They're all "fast" cars relative to the FT86. I'm still probably more interested in a 3200-lb. 2.0 vs. 3400 lb. 3.0. Even "very little" aftermarket support for the 2.0 could give big power gains given turbo.

Used 2.0 may be on my radar now But more likely I'll keep my BRZ and replace with a '23 or '24 "big-block" 2.4 BRZ in a couple of years...

[blackhawkdown]

Originally Posted by ZDan

Low resale = good argument to buy used if going 2.0.
The drag races above are kind of telling, the 2.0 doesn't exactly get destroyed by the 3.0 and MkIV, not to the expected degree. Granted, not ideal launch conditions but still... They're all "fast" cars relative to the FT86. I'm still probably more interested in a 3200-lb. 2.0 vs. 3400 lb. 3.0. Even "very little" aftermarket support for the 2.0 could give big power gains given turbo.

Used 2.0 may be on my radar now But more likely I'll keep my BRZ and replace with a '23 or '24 "big-block" 2.4 BRZ in a couple of years...

The 2.0 is very different from the 3.0. It’s a night and day difference. If you don’t mind the ridicule from other Supra owners, then go for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[WolfpackS2k]

Originally Posted by ZDan

Low resale = good argument to buy used if going 2.0.
The drag races above are kind of telling, the 2.0 doesn't exactly get destroyed by the 3.0 and MkIV, not to the expected degree. Granted, not ideal launch conditions but still... They're all "fast" cars relative to the FT86. I'm still probably more interested in a 3200-lb. 2.0 vs. 3400 lb. 3.0. Even "very little" aftermarket support for the 2.0 could give big power gains given turbo.

A standing start drag race hides all the faults of a 2.0 liter turbo.

More interesting, and telling, and real world applicable, would be a rolling race.

[ZDan]

Originally Posted by blackhawkdown

The 2.0 is very different from the 3.0. It’s a night and day difference. If you don’t mind the ridicule from other Supra owners, then go for it.

Ridicule is nothing to be scared of!

[ZDan]

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k

A standing start drag race hides all the faults of a 2.0 liter turbo.

More interesting, and telling, and real world applicable, would be a rolling race.

Performance at the track vs. other similar power/weight cars would be my real-world. I do some ~7/10ths spirited backroads driving occasionally on the street, but no impromptu roll-racing...

[vh_supra26]

Originally Posted by ZDan

Low resale = good argument to buy used if going 2.0.

Apples to oranges because its a really old car but I just picked up a clean 2004 2.5 Z4 with 33k on the odometer for $5.5k. The 3.0s with around the same mileage were in the $10k range.