Tossing between GT vs GTS

[jonnyboy]

The key GTS bits which I value are the headlights, LSD and paddle shifters (if u are thinking of the auto), push button start and digital speedo read out.
So if you really appreciate these things, you should go for the GTS.

[Type[R]+]

Originally Posted by fuddbutter

The BRZ comes with heated seats if you get the leather pack.

which I don't want.....

[moo moo nel]

thanks for the inputs guys

I actually dropped by Sydney Toyota this afternoon spending about 15mins to look at the GTS auto they have... as well as a quick chat with the sales rep (name Harry... very helpful guy). I want a manual so I didn't ask for a test drive...

On the way back to work I made up my mind to keep the 6k.

Based on ... the followings are only my opinions OK?

1. Mechanically they are the same
2. A set of aftermarket ventilated brake disc is not expensive
3. There are better looking & lighter aftermarket wheels
4. Same steering wheel (I was told)
5. GTS gets a better interior but still... just average... (Yeah I know...WYPIWYG)
6. Don't really need the day time running lights...the car will catch people's attention
7. Digital speedo + white dial look really nice , but the car still can move without one
8. I don't use Sat Nav often. Bluetooth and USB port are MUST HAVE though
9. Shorter waiting period (I was told)
10. GT is 18kg lighter I lost count how much money I spent on my ex trackday car to make it 20kg lighter

[crimespree]

The GT is lighter and therefore faster, end of discussion...

seriously, it wasn't that the extras weren't worth it but it just ceased it be the bargain it is. 40k and you have to consider other cars.. at 34, not really..

[sneaky]

Originally Posted by crimespree

it wasn't that the extras weren't worth it but it just ceased it be the bargain it is. 40k and you have to consider other cars.. at 34, not really..

^^^^^ this

[os86]

This is what I was quoted in VIC - GT $34,000 & GTS 38,800 (Includes ORC plus mats and tank of fuel)

- Difference of $4,800 in price

[shire1976]

I've got a GT and its the best decision ive ever made.

I prefer the look of the GT wheels and the only thing I hated was the 1982 head unit, but upgraded to full eclipse Sat nav which lifts the interior massively.

But bottom line even more than the 6k saving was the fact I'm now driving an 86 which is basically mechanically the same and looks the same to the untrained eye, rather than waiting until next year. Easy decision I reckon.

[manonastick]

Im sure someone is going to make a real carbon fibre dash to replace on the gt anyways.
Im set on a gt model the only thing i really want on the gts is the digitial cluster but im sure i will get one second hand later on once spares are more common lol.

[450hp/tonne]

Originally Posted by os86

This is what I was quoted in VIC - GT $34,000 & GTS 38,800 (Includes ORC plus mats and tank of fuel)

- Difference of $4,800 in price and I chose the GTS

Red GTS M/T here for $38,600 with ORC and darkest legal tint.

17" wheels were dynamically better.
Dual zone climate control and heated leather seats got the tick of approval from the boss (wife).
Smart entry and start makes me happy, as does the interior (T-mesh trim ... or as others are incorrectly saying, carbon fibre).
The audio/GPS unit didn't inspire me much ...

The GTS value to me made it worthwhile, but I know everyone is different and I understand individuals justifications for GT or GTS.

[crimespree]

i am planning on putting in the GTS handbrake and possibly the knee pads, dash panel could be easily upgraded too, cost... hmmm. hopefully such bits are cheap enough, silver bits (gear surround, ac vents) could be easily painted silver, even by auto trimmers if you want an OEM look, i think a darker silver would look better

[Nafe]

Personally, the GT is perfect for me. Cost aside. I don't like the stock 17's. The stock 16's look better IMO and they will be changed anyway. I have no care for leather, dual zone climate control, nav or push button start. none of these things make the car faster or handle better. The only things I like more are the headlights, but HID's aren't a deal breaker. Bee driving with halogens for 11 years :P The biggest thing was the brakes, but they can be upgraded anyway.
That's my personal opinion.
The "cheap" GT interior is still the nicest car I've owned, because I have never owned anything new. And all I really wanted was manual air con.
SO I am very happy with the decision for a GT It arrives soon enough.

[Maj3sty]

For those going AT instead of MT, the GT lacks LSD and hence is a bit of a deal breaker.

GTS has LSD across all models.

[st162celica]

Gts for me. Well I only have to wait til sept.(hopefully)

If i had to wait 3 months or more for gts , then I would GT. 18 months is a joke.

GT since the wait gap is so big. Spare money for mods.

[Calais]

Originally Posted by moo moo nel

thanks for the inputs guys

I actually dropped by Sydney Toyota this afternoon spending about 15mins to look at the GTS auto they have... as well as a quick chat with the sales rep (name Harry... very helpful guy). I want a manual so I didn't ask for a test drive...

On the way back to work I made up my mind to keep the 6k.

Based on ... the followings are only my opinions OK?

1. Mechanically they are the same
2. A set of aftermarket ventilated brake disc is not expensive
3. There are better looking & lighter aftermarket wheels
4. Same steering wheel (I was told)
5. GTS gets a better interior but still... just average... (Yeah I know...WYPIWYG)
6. Don't really need the day time running lights...the car will catch people's attention
7. Digital speedo + white dial look really nice , but the car still can move without one
8. I don't use Sat Nav often. Bluetooth and USB port are MUST HAVE though
9. Shorter waiting period (I was told)
10. GT is 18kg lighter I lost count how much money I spent on my ex trackday car to make it 20kg lighter

OPINIONS? OPINIONS? your not allowed to have your own opinions in the internet, i mean it wasn't invented for the purpose of speaking your mind and finding others who think the same! blasphamy

Originally Posted by 450hp/tonne

Red GTS M/T here for $38,600 with ORC and darkest legal tint.

17" wheels were dynamically better.
Dual zone climate control and heated leather seats got the tick of approval from the boss (wife).
Smart entry and start makes me happy, as does the interior (T-mesh trim ... or as others are incorrectly saying, carbon fibre).
The audio/GPS unit didn't inspire me much ...

The GTS value to me made it worthwhile, but I know everyone is different and I understand individuals justifications for GT or GTS.

yea that it always a major factor in having to spend more money on something then you otherwise would

but yea as i said im cool with the 18 month wait beacuse it'l take that much time to save the money