|
||||||
| Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 | |
|
The Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Civic Turbo,FR-S
Location: NJ
Posts: 928
Thanks: 130
Thanked 171 Times in 119 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
The Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Civic Turbo,FR-S
Location: NJ
Posts: 928
Thanks: 130
Thanked 171 Times in 119 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 235
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've been getting the same weird logging issues too:. 15.05 commanded AFR, OL, light to medium throttle. Actual measured AFR looks fine, car runs great, no CELs, no write failures. The only change I made to fueling is I made the CL load comp tables have offsets that make it match the POL table. It generally runs richer than the OTS CL map.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,280
Thanks: 515
Thanked 1,121 Times in 811 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I followed 3 guys with OFT in the last year and all of them have that kind of offset in the logged command afr value
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
During closed loop the rear 02 sensor can influence the commanded afr value log AFCorrection #3
If af#3 corrections not disabled then you will see some offset in commanded afr by the rear 02 sensor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,280
Thanks: 515
Thanked 1,121 Times in 811 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I see the offset also with rear O2 Disabled
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 235
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So I logged almost everything I could find in OFT related to O2 and AFR for this and it looks like commanded AFR going to 15.05 under throttle correlates to something called a/f sensor voltage going below ~2V. There is no scaling matching this in the OFT defs I have; OFT has a front O2 sensor scaling in current, not volts.
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-....96&tmax=15.06 I'll do more correlation analysis on this log in Octave after dinner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 235
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
OK, here are some plots for: commanded AFR = 15.06 RPMs increasing Fuel system = OL https://imgur.com/a/Ym8HhIv First pic has the x-axes all sync'd are time in seconds. ![]() Second pic is just the bottom right 2 plots with the gaps taken out. X-axes are just samples, not time. ![]() Is there a measured AFR limit of ~13.5 for CL? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Post the oft log to www.datazap.me will be esier to read
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 235
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
you commanded AFR is not logging correctly what calid is your tune ? are you using OFT V4 tunes ?
commanded afr may be being offset by the rear 02 sensor readings can you log AF#3 ? or alternative disable rear 02 sensor corre ctions by zeroing the two AF#3 correction tables the rest looks ok, but i think your problem is just logging is incorrect for your rom/tune http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2909412 |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 235
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I'm not sure I'm understanding your linked forum post, so let me see if I have it right. If the correct cal ID doesn't fix this, you're saying I can set the limits for my AF #3 sensor to 0/0, even if my RomRaider def puts it in a different group ("ALPHA AF 3 (Rear O2 Sensor)", not "Fueling - AF Correction/Learning") from what was shown in your screen cap?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dash Command App and Oil Temp on iPhone and iPad | nzer | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 38 | 03-19-2017 01:33 PM |
| Dash command for BOOST | Flat_4_Life | Forced Induction | 5 | 01-18-2016 01:13 PM |
| idle afr is 14.05? command and actual...what gives? | Lytheum | Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB | 1 | 06-24-2013 02:21 PM |
| Voice or GUI command to pause guidance? | Sovran | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 0 | 09-25-2012 03:21 PM |
| handsfree voice command help | lbroskee | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 5 | 09-13-2012 05:51 PM |