|
Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-16-2018, 08:47 AM | #29 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2013 BRZ Premium
Location: AR
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Catless header, stock overpipe, stock front pipe w/ cat and stock midpipe with muffler delete. The road was flat. US 93oct Here are some previous runs on the same road. Green is the current map. |
|
08-16-2018, 09:20 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Ok, I found the "issue". You are using the Mustang Dyno option which gives lower numbers. If you select the DynoJet option, then you'll get much higher numbers. You are fine.
|
08-16-2018, 09:28 AM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2013 BRZ Premium
Location: AR
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
LOL picked up 20WHP!!!
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vtekdis For This Useful Post: | freerunner (08-17-2018), nikitopo (08-16-2018) |
08-16-2018, 11:14 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 2017 WRB M/T BRZ
Location: BKK, Thailand
Posts: 114
Thanks: 77
Thanked 37 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I mean you don't have to explain the whole thing, only just let me know which program and where I can get the instruction that I can follow. This one? http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64790 |
|
08-16-2018, 11:27 PM | #33 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2013 BRZ Premium
Location: AR
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G955U1 using Tapatalk |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vtekdis For This Useful Post: | Spec C Wannabe (08-19-2018) |
08-17-2018, 06:16 AM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
MAF scaling (with crude PI/DI-balancing) in a nutshell: https://www.ft86club.com/forums/show...99&postcount=5 |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to freerunner For This Useful Post: | Spec C Wannabe (08-19-2018), vtekdis (08-17-2018) |
08-17-2018, 12:02 PM | #35 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2013 BRZ Premium
Location: AR
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong regarding the following inputs: MAF V and MAF row is for the calculated scale out of VGI tool Comparison row gets the MAF from the scale used in data logging The shaping tool is slightly confusing to me based on some of the data I've been trying to feed through it. I've been using the VGI smoothing function to do this part but I would like to understand 86's tool better. Thanks for your help! |
|
08-17-2018, 01:01 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I think my intention was to get CL values that actually fit the car (performed via VGI tool) for 86inches' spreadsheet.
I put the calibrated values in the MAF_V/MAF rows. Comparison row doesn't get touched by now. Then (in the spreadsheet) to adjust the modifiers to get maf g/secs up about 3.0V to 'follow' the precalibrated VGI-curve while focussing on 'matching' the 3.0V value. The spreadsheet then does its magic and pre-calibrates the open loop part automatically. I copy the results into the comparison row. I tweaked the spreadsheet to get % difference between comparison row and result row, when I'm adjusting the modifiers. Hm maybe I should attach my spreadsheet, since it's probably easier to simply show it than to explain it. It's important to get the scaling at around 3.0V (for the final fuel trim) right, else the ECU works against the OL part of the scaling. After that is done, the upper voltage range can be edited with VGI or by hand, no problem. But in the end, it just an alternative way for using VGItool or adjusting the tables manually. It's not better or worse if the data is right. If you have any further questions, just ask right away. |
The Following User Says Thank You to freerunner For This Useful Post: | vtekdis (08-17-2018) |
08-17-2018, 01:58 PM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2013 BRZ Premium
Location: AR
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
This is the part I don't quite understand ...
|
08-17-2018, 04:18 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Why you guys, that spend the time to scale the maf, don't disable directly LTFT in open loop so that the maf is always scaled perfectly and you dont have to care about the ltft at 3v?
Fensport in UK tunes all the cars this way and the afr is always matched to the target, it s so much easier |
08-17-2018, 04:39 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
It's difficult for me to explain, but I'll try:
The trick is to fill the "CAL"-row with numbers to increase or decrease the slope of the new maf curve. It does not need to exactly match the pre-calibrated maf curve - so if there are "hills" and "valleys", you just try to adjust the new curve to go through the middle of it, with the least possible amount of corrections in the CAL-row. The ECU will compensate with STFT+LTFT in these regions. No reason to freak out about fuel-trims. Just the area around 3V should be treated with care, we don't want much interfering from the ECU here, because the final fuel trim throws off the open-loop scale. edit: I try to get around +/- 0.5% difference to the vgitool-calibrated data here (coloured "red" in the spreadsheet). |
08-17-2018, 04:44 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I don't do it because I drive my car in the summer and in the winter. The UK got neither. Only rain. *cough* |
|
08-17-2018, 04:44 PM | #41 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2013 BRZ Premium
Location: AR
Posts: 19
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Based on your spreadsheet and the data you used what's the point of all of this if your calculated MAF points below 3V are exactly the same as the VGI generated scale? Am I missing something?
|
08-17-2018, 04:45 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
just disable ltft in open loop and you dont have to care about ltft in 3v area
just scale the maf in open loop and you will always have a perfect afr for a given fuel,without worrying of ltft applied |
|
|
Tags |
equal length, header, romraider |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Innovate I/C supercharger and Nameless header and option of install and tune | Lawnik | Canada Classifieds | 15 | 01-26-2015 11:01 AM |
stg1 custom tune add intake retune =??? | StormTrooper | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 11 | 12-23-2013 05:59 PM |
AVO STG1 Turbo Kit New in the Box w/Visconti map sensor upgrade and tune | JMPoole | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 8 | 04-04-2013 04:47 PM |
Visconti Tuning Vortech STG1 & STG1+ Supercharger Kits! | Visconti | Forced Induction | 67 | 04-03-2013 03:56 PM |
Perrin STG1 tune | Celica00 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 125 | 10-19-2012 11:59 PM |