follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2018, 03:25 PM   #43
nico_rsx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: BRZ 2017 Pure Red, MT
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 309
Thanks: 122
Thanked 121 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
Who said I am comparing with my car? I just don't like someone to say that you can get a +40-50 hp gain just with a header and a tune. It is unrealistic. If you go with E85, then yes you are much closer. However, if you want to do it right then you the need a flex fuel kit and be lucky enough to find always a gas station.
I don't think he said you gain 40-50 hp with a header+tune, he only showed a graph.
But if we assume the graph is correct, he actually gained 30hp@peak power (without E85), and almost 40hp at 4500rpm (still without e85).

Like Kodename47 I am also interested to know why not keep the 2017 FD?
nico_rsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 04:21 PM   #44
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,947 Times in 1,263 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nico_rsx View Post
I don't think he said you gain 40-50 hp with a header+tune, he only showed a graph.
But if we assume the graph is correct, he actually gained 30hp@peak power (without E85), and almost 40hp at 4500rpm (still without e85).
Yes peak power is +30hp (without E85), but it is not enough to pull a s2k. You need more power and not 1hp,2hp or even 5hp. With such a small difference it will take forever to pass the other car. You don't have too much length on a track. If both cars were at 4500rpm, then yes the BRZ would have an advantage. The S2K is pretty weak in these rpms. The issue is that if you are pulling hard and you are at 45000rpm, then you are doing something wrong (wrong gear or too long final drive ratio for the specific track). So, I find it unlikely that they were pulling from that low.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 02:21 AM   #45
Doozer
Senior Member
 
Doozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: gt86...among others
Location: edis rehto eht
Posts: 110
Thanks: 61
Thanked 176 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Opinion only

S2K's are faster in the corners and in a straight line
86 chassis is more stable and much better under braking
no idea the numbers S2K's are putting out

Success from beating S2K's only comes from patience. (again, opinion only)

Once in front, the 86 can pull away using braking techniques to limit the S2K's offensive weapons

This particular pass was only because S2K driver missed a shift.

S2K is Motec CR2000 with "red head" built engine. FD unknown. Tires: Yokohama A005
86 is Delicious E85 with Anaconda 42.9 header and 4.8FD. No aero and stock motor. Tires: Michelin S8C

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxm2QmpoWyo&t=1s"]BRZ GT86 FRS v S2000 - YouTube[/ame]
__________________
racing gods live deep in corners
Doozer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Doozer For This Useful Post:
NAEightySix (03-04-2018)
Old 03-04-2018, 02:47 AM   #46
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
So you put the older FD in the newer car?
sure did!
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 02:47 AM   #47
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
Lol, you have a tendency to over exaggerate things. We were not discussing here about E85, but just changing the header and the tune. You cannot pull a S2k in straight line with these two changes.
I own both cars, and this is a roll race I've done many, many times with non-believers. Result is conclusive.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Hades (03-04-2018), NAEightySix (03-04-2018)
Old 03-04-2018, 02:50 AM   #48
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
Yes peak power is +30hp (without E85), but it is not enough to pull a s2k. You need more power and not 1hp,2hp or even 5hp. With such a small difference it will take forever to pass the other car. You don't have too much length on a track. If both cars were at 4500rpm, then yes the BRZ would have an advantage. The S2K is pretty weak in these rpms. The issue is that if you are pulling hard and you are at 45000rpm, then you are doing something wrong (wrong gear or too long final drive ratio for the specific track). So, I find it unlikely that they were pulling from that low.
Lets do some ricer bench racing.

165.7whp = 205 crank hp. That extrapolates to 195.3whp = 241.6 crank hp. The S2000 is 237 crank hp. Not only that, the F22C's peak power is at redline, so you only get to ride one side of the curve. With the FA20 + Ace, you get to ride both sides of the curve, resulting in a larger AUC.

Even the math checks out, quite conclusively.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Hades (03-04-2018)
Old 03-04-2018, 03:01 AM   #49
NAEightySix
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 2015 Scion FRS 6MT (Asphalt)
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 83
Thanks: 230
Thanked 36 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doozer View Post
Opinion only



S2K's are faster in the corners and in a straight line

86 chassis is more stable and much better under braking

no idea the numbers S2K's are putting out



Success from beating S2K's only comes from patience. (again, opinion only)



Once in front, the 86 can pull away using braking techniques to limit the S2K's offensive weapons



This particular pass was only because S2K driver missed a shift.



S2K is Motec CR2000 with "red head" built engine. FD unknown. Tires: Yokohama A005

86 is Delicious E85 with Anaconda 42.9 header and 4.8FD. No aero and stock motor. Tires: Michelin S8C





Great stuff, it seemed pretty close most of the time, you seem like a great driver.

Would aero mods have helped you close the gap more in the corners?

Also, why the Anaconda over the 350 or CS400?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NAEightySix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 03:06 AM   #50
NAEightySix
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 2015 Scion FRS 6MT (Asphalt)
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 83
Thanks: 230
Thanked 36 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks to everyone; it’s nice to see different people’s opinion.

Hopefully, this’ll help me decide on something I’ll be happy with... my car is nothing more than a daily driver as of right now that I drive spiritedly whenever possible, although I’d like to take it to the local track one day and see how it fares against other cars.

Both my brothers have AP2s and it seems that they’re always mocking the potential the 86 has lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NAEightySix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NAEightySix For This Useful Post:
nikitopo (03-04-2018)
Old 03-04-2018, 06:51 AM   #51
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,947 Times in 1,263 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Lets do some ricer bench racing.

165.7whp = 205 crank hp. That extrapolates to 195.3whp = 241.6 crank hp. The S2000 is 237 crank hp. Not only that, the F22C's peak power is at redline, so you only get to ride one side of the curve. With the FA20 + Ace, you get to ride both sides of the curve, resulting in a larger AUC.

Even the math checks out, quite conclusively.
I am sorry if I insist on this, but you cannot really calculate the crank hp of the updated car with extrapolation. Losses on the wheel are not the same with different power levels.

Here is a video of 80-180km/h (50-112mph) of a 86 with Ace 350 header & tune AND a 4.67 final drive ratio. The other video is of a stock S2k AP1.




I measured both results and approximately we have:

86: 13.0 sec
s2k: 12.8 sec

You might say that they are almost identical, but not that the 86 will pull the s2k in straight line. And don't forget that the particular 86 has a changed final drive ratio which helps a lot in the result ...
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 10:51 AM   #52
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
I am sorry if I insist on this, but you cannot really calculate the crank hp of the updated car with extrapolation. Losses on the wheel are not the same with different power levels.

Here is a video of 80-180km/h (50-112mph) of a 86 with Ace 350 header & tune AND a 4.67 final drive ratio. The other video is of a stock S2k AP1.




I measured both results and approximately we have:

86: 13.0 sec
s2k: 12.8 sec

You might say that they are almost identical, but not that the 86 will pull the s2k in straight line. And don't forget that the particular 86 has a changed final drive ratio which helps a lot in the result ...
Okay cool. So lets rev that car to redline, instead of 7300, and try again. I suspect you'll have a vastly different result.

Alternatively, a car with a stock final drive will ALSO have an even faster result, due to 1 less shift (do the math for gearing).
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 12:39 PM   #53
Hades
Senior Member
 
Hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: Socal
Posts: 214
Thanks: 521
Thanked 100 Times in 64 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I don't see where the debate is. 86 + Ace makes more power than a *stock* s2k everywhere. I doubt it could pull on an s2k with IHE but would love to be proven wrong.
Hades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 02:46 PM   #54
NoHaveMSG
Senior Member
 
NoHaveMSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: Crapcan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,564
Thanks: 18,845
Thanked 16,848 Times in 7,662 Posts
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hades View Post
I don't see where the debate is. 86 + Ace makes more power than a *stock* s2k everywhere. I doubt it could pull on an s2k with IHE but would love to be proven wrong.
What's funny is why are we comparing different cars at this point? I think the general question you see on the forum is what is the best header? Shouldn't this be about comparing the ACE to other headers on the 86 platform?

I'd advise anyone interested in purchasing to throw the numbers out of the window and just look at the damn curves.
NoHaveMSG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NoHaveMSG For This Useful Post:
Hades (03-04-2018), NAEightySix (03-04-2018)
Old 03-04-2018, 04:21 PM   #55
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,277
Thanks: 515
Thanked 1,121 Times in 811 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
I don't know how many times you've seen this, but have it again!

i'm surely missing something, but how is 42hp gain even possible with just header+ tune

i have UEL header + full skat + tune from Fensport and I don't even reach a 20hp gain with 100Ron fuel... and you get 42hp with just header and tune and normal fuel?
tomm.brz is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post:
NAEightySix (03-04-2018)
Old 03-04-2018, 04:43 PM   #56
Apex No.525300887039
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 19
Thanks: 5
Thanked 18 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
i'm surely missing something, but how is 42hp gain even possible with just header+ tune

i have UEL header + full skat + tune from Fensport and I don't even reach a 20hp gain with 100Ron fuel... and you get 42hp with just header and tune and normal fuel?
Red is E85
Blue is 91 Octane (~95RON?)

header only IIRC
Apex No.525300887039 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Apex No.525300887039 For This Useful Post:
NAEightySix (03-04-2018)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
jdl header / tune questions dtrop Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 13 03-31-2016 04:40 PM
Header Gasket Questions gepeyo Northern California 11 02-02-2015 11:51 PM
EL header questions newports Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 2 03-29-2014 02:41 AM
Intake, Header, Exhaust questions KillionsFRS Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 8 09-05-2013 11:12 PM
header tech questions and opinions ft86me Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 7 04-01-2013 04:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.