Drove my FR-S today, did not crash... - Page 57 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

Jordanwolf · 02-01-2018, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcj

C'mon by! The water is ... uh, wet.

By definition water cannot be "wet". "Wet" is an attribute given to something covered in water. My hands are wet, my basketballs are wet, my shoes are wet, my car is wet.

Water is not wet.

Dadhawk · 02-01-2018, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat

You can't get the over the counter codeine stuff anymore.

I miss codeine...it makes me loopy, better than getting drunk.

Dadhawk · 02-01-2018, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordanwolf

By definition water cannot be "wet". "Wet" is an attribute given to something covered in water. My hands are wet, my basketballs are wet, my shoes are wet, my car is wet.

Water is not wet.

Water can be wet, you just have to lower its temperature below 0 degrees C first.

humfrz · 02-01-2018, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hades

I wish they did this in California for texters.

Yep, up here, even touching (except, quickly with one finger) any portable electronic device while driving will get you a fine.

humfrz

humfrz · 02-01-2018, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dadhawk

Not much chance of that happening...I love driving and all but don't see out for a casual Sunday drive in Georgia and ending up in Washington....

...well at least not for another 5 years or so....

Come on out ....... we have some real mountains for your FR-S to climb .....

humfrz

Jordanwolf · 02-01-2018, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dadhawk

Water can be wet, you just have to lower its temperature below 0 degrees C first.

Logically illogical. That would be ice sir.

humfrz · 02-01-2018, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordanwolf

By definition water cannot be "wet". "Wet" is an attribute given to something covered in water. My hands are wet, my basketballs are wet, my shoes are wet, my car is wet.

Water is not wet.

Careful there, Jordanwolf, we have some philosophers and scientists on the forum that could eat your lunch by you making statements like that .....

humfrz

Jordanwolf · 02-01-2018, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by humfrz

Careful there, Jordanwolf, we have some philosophers and scientists on the forum that could eat your lunch by you making statements like that .....

humfrz

My science behind this is flawless and fact, not a statement. They shall not eat my lunch, for I am too wise.

humfrz · 02-01-2018, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordanwolf

My science behind this is flawless and fact, not a statement. They shall not eat my lunch, for I am too wise.

OK, Jordanwolf, let's see how well the short bus driver explained the "wet" situation when he told you not to put your mouth on the window by your seat on the short bus.

So, are you talking about one molecule of water or six or more molecules of water .....??

humfrz

Jordanwolf · 02-01-2018, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by humfrz

OK, Jordanwolf, let's see how well the short bus driver explained the "wet" situation when he told you not to put your mouth on the window by your seat on the short bus.

So, are you talking about one molecule of water or six or more molecules of water .....??

humfrz

Only those who ride the bus will understand my science.

Tcoat · 02-01-2018, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordanwolf

Logically illogical. That would be ice sir.

Ice is not water in your world? How about steam is that not water either?

Hades · 02-01-2018, 08:49 PM

@Jordanwolf sounds like you have some beef with this stackoverflow post: https://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...out-transition

guybo · 02-01-2018, 08:55 PM

Of course water is wet. As long as you define the area of water. If you define the area of water to be less than the whole area of water to which you are referring, it would have to be wet because the area of water outside the designated water would be covering that water.

Oh yeah, drove to the supermarket today. No crash

humfrz · 02-01-2018, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guybo

Of course water is wet. As long as you define the area of water. If you define the area of water to be less than the whole area of water to which you are referring, it would have to be wet because the area of water outside the designated water would be covering that water.

Oh yeah, drove to the supermarket today. No crash

Oh, guybo, I doubt you're gonna eat @Jordanwolf 's lunch with that argument .....

humfrz

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Today I drove....	Phantobe	Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions	18	02-15-2015 01:16 AM
Drove a PDK today...	serialk11r	Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions	22	03-08-2014 09:19 PM
Test drove the FRS today...	Mikem53	Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum	20	05-07-2013 10:55 AM
Drove a 500 Abarth today......	track_warrior	Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions	17	05-11-2012 12:59 PM

02-01-2018, 08:49 PM	#796
Hades Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Drives: 2013 Scion FRS Location: Socal Posts: 214 Thanks: 521 Thanked 100 Times in 64 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	@Jordanwolf sounds like you have some beef with this stackoverflow post: https://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...out-transition

02-01-2018, 08:55 PM	#797
guybo Huge E85 fan! Join Date: May 2016 Drives: 2016 Scion FRS Location: Tampa, FL, USA Posts: 1,850 Thanks: 539 Thanked 1,010 Times in 605 Posts Mentioned: 32 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Of course water is wet. As long as you define the area of water. If you define the area of water to be less than the whole area of water to which you are referring, it would have to be wet because the area of water outside the designated water would be covering that water. Oh yeah, drove to the supermarket today. No crash

User Name		Remember Me?
Password