|
||||||
| Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#29 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 560
Thanks: 188
Thanked 187 Times in 120 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
It's actually quite reasonable compared to most strut tower bars I've ever seen.
I've thought of a logical explanation for why Subaru would NOT have included this bar if it "really" would have helped fight deflection. Look at the picture again... the bar is covering up their D4-S advertisement :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
When In Doubt...
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Slowww
Location: PA215
Posts: 1,844
Thanks: 1,023
Thanked 752 Times in 412 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Could someone please answer this for me? I don't want to make a stupid pointless thread.
__________________
Join the Galaxy Blue Silica BRZ registry below: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...2c&usp=sharing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,012 Times in 2,098 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
|
Improvement in "feel" isn't proven unless you can reliably detect when the bar is in place and when it is not in place in blind testing. Highly doubtful!
The bowed shape over the intake makes it more of a spring than a rigid brace, particularly given the way the ends are squashed in a straight line across the diameter of the bar = hinge points. Look at the way the ends of the factory bars are squashed, giving some bending stiffness, and in addition there's very little eccentricity between the mounting plane and neutral axis of the factory tubes, and they're *straight* (way way WAY stiffer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|