|
||||||
| Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,947 Times in 1,263 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I think that Tor is on his own and depending the cause of the problem he might solve the issue or not. Personally, I wouldn't take the risk and I would flash immediately the tune back to stock. I guess everyone is different. Last edited by nikitopo; 05-18-2017 at 03:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
The AC is off most of the time I drive the car. I'm using 100 octane fuel and have no other knock worth mentioning. The stock tune has tip in knock too. I'm not going back to stock because of (potential) knock in low load transients and only in one specific circumstance. This is not something that really worries me, more it annoys me.
Also I'm not too sure how much I trust the logs in this specific scenario, as MotoEast wrote that it doesn't always show up in the logs. I could imagine that the rapid change could make it difficult for the ECU to react and the logged values (if any) may not correspond with the actual severity. Of course that personal imagination/theory. Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Tor; 05-18-2017 at 04:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
|
Quote:
haha, my reasoning here is to eliminate fuel quality, if you add octane booster or better fuel then theoretically knock should reduce. If it doesn't reduce at all then the cause may not be knock but a mechanical problem like exhaust hitting on chassis fooling knock sensor faulty or loose knock sensor or other mechanical noise being interpreted as knock :-) or you have some other major tune issue or hardware issue causing for example a very lean condition. for example incorrect scaling of 02 sensor. can cause you to run incorrect AFR but logging will show correct afr, always best to check with another independent sensor if weird stuff happening. Flashing to stock is always a good check to do to eliminate hardware/tune issue, however not always possible if you have changed components that require "tune" or running say E85. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
|
Quote:
yes as long as scaling/offset is same in both defs should be ok the more aggressive transient retard may dull on/off throttle response |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,947 Times in 1,263 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
|
I agree that in weird cases the best approach is to check with independent sensors. In my case it wasn't possible because of e-tuning. I feel lucky that the engine survived and the last 4 years runs strong.
Wishing good luck to Tor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I suppose a lighter flywheel would counter any dulling effect? My throwout bearing is making a lot of squeaking noises so a new clutch might be in a near future anyway.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just saying that it is not really possible to know if you tune was actually to blame without having investigated more thoroughly.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post: | strat61caster (05-18-2017) |
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,947 Times in 1,263 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
|
Well the car was almost new and the problem appeared after using the tune and disappeared after I flashed back the stock definitions. I tried sometimes back and forth, but I had always problems. I am not saying that the tune was completely rubbish. There was an amazing improvement in fuel consumption. In fact the car had a 30-40% improvement, by working more time in closed loop! However, I wouldn't risk to lose my engine just for this reason.
In general I am a fan of what tuning can achieve, but only if it can be done by correct means. Check here an older post of what tuning improvements the GT86s had in the SP3 class category at the Nürburgring 24h race: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...3&postcount=13 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
|
That seems to be an unrealistic increase in fuel economy on the forrester. If your engine smelt hot id suspect it was running way lean for some reason, were you able to log afr and commanded afr and exhaust gass temp ( cat temp) overly high exhaust temps can jndicate lean condition.
If you still have tactrix you can log your 86. Is interesting excersise. Which rom calibration are you ? All you need to do is used sd mam card in tactrix and load the logcfg.txt and tactrix will intertogate ecu. ( No alterations just log ) Or just use toyota techstream software, free, with your tactrix to monitor 86 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,417
Thanked 1,947 Times in 1,263 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
|
These were the fuel maps of the forester. I don't think it was something extreme:
Stock ![]() Tuned ![]() The burning smell was in the middle range (1800 - 3200), where the tuned map adds a bit more fuel for knock resistance. Anyway, I don't have the Tactrix cable anymore. So no more logging or changes for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
|
Quote:
at low rpm cruising it probably wont be using the Open loop maps, it will likey be in closed loop. The closed loop tables are an offset from 14.7 and negative so if the closed loop tables contains -0.3 target is 14.4. If the def is bad or you put 0 or positive values in their then rearly weird stuff happens and it can run way lean and ltft is disabled and/or do other strange things. mr throttle happy may have "hacked the 02 sensor scaling to fool ecu so he could run leaner cruise AFR than 14.7 see here http://www.romraider.com/forum/viewt...p?f=15&t=11266 . Last edited by steve99; 05-19-2017 at 09:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Drives: 2014 BRZ sterling silver
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 129
Thanks: 36
Thanked 39 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
Was there anything you changed just before you started hearing this noise? or did it start right after a track day or something like that. Also I would like to know what oil you use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Update:
I tried the MY17 transient table. I can't say anything for sure yet as I also removed 2 deg timing in the same area between 3 and 4k rpm due to some AVCS adjustments in the same range. The noise went away due to one or the other of these changes. Also, the throttle felt less responsive as Steve predicted, but not too bad. After the AVCS adjustments didn't give the results I wanted (tried to adjust AFR with Intake cam - didn't work, or at least the few deg I adjusted didn't have any visible effect) I went back to my previous tables and restored the 2 deg timing as well. Since I didn't hear any noises I halved the values in the transient table and flashed again. The noise came back. Whether it was due to restoring the 2 deg timing or halving the transient values I don't know yet. I wanted to flash the full MY17 transient again but started working on scaling my MAF instead (it was a productive day ). Will let you know how it works out with the full MY17 table and my normal timing.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post: | steve99 (05-22-2017) |
|
|
#28 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 141
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I once had this issue and solved it with increasing the corresponding values in my exhaust-avcs tables. The cause was my own fault, I advanced the exhaust cams before for the while load range. Now they're back to stock (0-2k rpm, up to 0.7 load). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rod Knock on leased FR-S | tony707c | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 32 | 04-25-2017 07:11 PM |
| Knock Correction vs Knock Correction Learn values? | swift996 | Software Tuning | 19 | 11-03-2015 10:09 PM |
| FR-S Rod knock | pozer | Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB | 95 | 11-03-2015 09:39 AM |
| Oft knock | brady86 | Software Tuning | 26 | 07-15-2015 10:14 PM |
| Tip in knock? | bmsi30 | Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB | 17 | 08-25-2014 04:12 PM |