follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-22-2016, 04:58 AM   #29
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
What is your source on this info and how confident are you on it? KW customer support told me, "We are moving away from inserts on ST and V1s. still the same valving just wet filled now." That may corroborate your info.

I have the original version of ST coilovers for the 86. What annoys me is this past year creaking/clunking started to develop and did not go away after retorquing everything. Also took months for the height to fully settle (had to raise it 3 times because height kept drooping). Thinking of getting the new GReddy X KW coilovers. But exterior construction looks too similar to my ST and makes me hesitant I will get the same drooping and noise issues. In that case, I will bite the bullet for TRD coilovers (a bit pricey but their parts have never given me problems for over a decade on multiple platforms).
The exterior construction of the XTA is 100% identical with KW V3. The internals, are wet filled which you can see in the video in post 11. Here you see the whole assembly of an ST XA damper, T just means front Top mounts included.

I didn't have the V1 in my hands, but as you said. KW themselves confirmed it for you that they use inserts. That inserts are from Al-ko I have from the German GT86 forum.

The Greddy dampers look identical to the XTA. If choosing between those, I would go for the Greddy due to the 6/7 spring rates and leave the swaybars stock.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 05:15 AM   #30
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
The exterior construction of the XTA is 100% identical with KW V3. The internals, are wet filled which you can see in the video in post 11. Here you see the whole assembly of an ST XA damper, T just means front Top mounts included.

I didn't have the V1 in my hands, but as you said. KW themselves confirmed it for you that they use inserts. That inserts are from Al-ko I have from the German GT86 forum.

The Greddy dampers look identical to the XTA. If choosing between those, I would go for the Greddy due to the 6/7 spring rates and leave the swaybars stock.
Actually KW confirmed current ST and V1 models are revised to wet filled now. Their older models for our cars were dry inserts and no longer being sold. Based on that, would you say the new wet filled models are not from AL-KO but made in the same factory as the rest of their higher end product line?
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 07:09 AM   #31
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
Actually KW confirmed current ST and V1 models are revised to wet filled now. Their older models for our cars were dry inserts and no longer being sold. Based on that, would you say the new wet filled models are not from AL-KO but made in the same factory as the rest of their higher end product line?
I see, I misread it as they would change in the future. Sorry, can't answer that question with anything but guesses. It would make sense though that they do it in-house in that case. Did say how long ago it is that they made that switch?
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 11:07 AM   #32
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,520
Thanks: 3,542
Thanked 7,416 Times in 3,034 Posts
Mentioned: 311 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
The exterior construction of the XTA is 100% identical with KW V3.
Except for the finish (inox stainless steel for KW). That's a big concern for salted roads here.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 08:37 PM   #33
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
Except for the finish (inox stainless steel for KW). That's a big concern for salted roads here.
Yes, it was wrt to switchlanez's question. I did mention that otherwise both in the video and in previous posts.

I sprayed my XTAs with grease. So far they look like new (greasy ) coilovers, driving them over the summer and fall.

I am not so sure it's such a big problem though considering the price. Probably the dampers will be shot long before rust becomes a major issue. For the price, I consider them a discardable once the dampers need rebuilding.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 02:46 PM   #34
Yoshoobaroo
TRACKBREAD
 
Yoshoobaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,033 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Garage
Did you get most of the front camber from the slot on the shock body or from the camber plate? I'm thinking if I should go for the regular coils or the XTA, especially now that they seem to use the same wet fill cartridge. I've had both on.my BMWs, ST X on my E92, and ST XTA on my E46. The XTA was too harsh for DD IMO and I did not take advantage of the rebound adjustment enough to warrant it. I'm not after a big drop either(~15mm). My only worry is getting enough camber up front without the plates. If that's no problem, I would rather spend the difference on sway bars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
An update on the XTAs, I now had them on track:



My full mod list is in my build thread.

Relevant thing for the handling are:
- Suspension Technologies ST XTA coilovers
- Suspension Technologies anti-swaybars
- Pirelli P Zero Nero GT 225x40R18 (street tires)

Setup is -2.5 deg camber front and -1.8 in the rear, with very slight toe-in all round. Swaybars in their soft setting and the dampers in a soft rebound setting 9/16. With that setup the car is neutral biased towards oversteer - the stock understeer at speed is completely gone.

The 6 kg/mm front, 5 kg/mm rear springs absolutely doesn't make the car understeer. It actually caught me by surprise on the very first lap.
Yoshoobaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 03:00 PM   #35
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshoobaroo View Post
Did you get most of the front camber from the slot on the shock body or from the camber plate? I'm thinking if I should go for the regular coils or the XTA, especially now that they seem to use the same wet fill cartridge. I've had both on.my BMWs, ST X on my E92, and ST XTA on my E46. The XTA was too harsh for DD IMO and I did not take advantage of the rebound adjustment enough to warrant it. I'm not after a big drop either(~15mm). My only worry is getting enough camber up front without the plates. If that's no problem, I would rather spend the difference on sway bars.
Most of the camber I got from the slot and with OEM crash bolts. About 2 deg I think. The rest from the top mounts.

The rest of your message I am having difficulty to read. Which "regular coilovers" do you mean? If you mean the ST (without XTA), then the dampers are not the same at all. There is no cartridge in the XTAs.

After owning the XTAs for some time now, my main complaint is the lack of compression adjustability. For track, I would really have liked to have that option now.

Hence, after all... I wouldn't recommend the XTA any longer. If looking for something for a street driven car, go for something that is more comfortable. KW V3 or Tein or something like that.

For track, something higher end. Or as entry level minimum KW V3 level and upwards (You live and learn).

Last edited by Tor; 04-27-2017 at 04:27 PM. Reason: spelling
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 03:33 PM   #36
Yoshoobaroo
TRACKBREAD
 
Yoshoobaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,033 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Garage
Sorry about the confusion there. By regular coilovers I meant the basic ST coilovers (ST X is the right name I think). When I typed cartridge I didn't mean that word haha. I meant that since the ST X are now wet fill, like the XTA (if I understood that right), there is not much benefit to the XTAs besides the spring rates, rebound adjustment, and camber plates. To top it off, the ST X should be more comfortable with the 4kg/mm spring up front vs the 6kg/mm in the XTA.

If you'd recommend the V3, then I think the ST X should be a good bet since they share spring rates with the V1/V2/V3, but they're much cheaper.

Thanks for the info on the camber! I think I'll go with the ST X coilovers and the ST sway bars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
Most of the camber I got from the slot and with OEM crash bolts. About 2 deg I think. The rest from the top mounts.

The rest of you message I am having difficult to read. Which "regular coilovers" do you mean? If you mean the ST (without XTA), then the dampers are not the same at all. There is no cartridge in the XTAs.

After owning the XTAs for some time now, my main complaint is the lack of compression adjustability. For track, I don't think they have enough compression dampening.

Hence, after all... I wouldn't recommend the XTA any longer. If looking for something for a street driven car, go for something that is more comfortable. KW V3 or Tein or something like that.

For track, something higher end. Or as entry level minimum KW V3 level and upwards (You live and learn).
Yoshoobaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 04:25 PM   #37
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshoobaroo View Post
Sorry about the confusion there. By regular coilovers I meant the basic ST coilovers (ST X is the right name I think). When I typed cartridge I didn't mean that word haha. I meant that since the ST X are now wet fill, like the XTA (if I understood that right)...
Ah yes, I forgot that the ST X allegedly should have KW in-house made dampers now. I don't know if that is true.
Quote:
there is not much benefit to the XTAs besides the spring rates, rebound adjustment, and camber plates.
That's still a few good benefit....
Quote:
To top it off, the ST X should be more comfortable with the 4kg/mm spring up front vs the 6kg/mm in the XTA.
...but probably correct, if this is your priority.
Quote:
If you'd recommend the V3, then I think the ST X should be a good bet since they share spring rates with the V1/V2/V3, but they're much cheaper.
Perhaps, but still depends on how they preset the dampers. I know from locals here that the V3 is very flexible in their adjustments. Probably I will replace my XTA's with either V3 or Clubsports down the line.
Quote:
Thanks for the info on the camber! I think I'll go with the ST X coilovers and the ST sway bars.
My choice is limited here, as every part I install on the car needs technical approval (TÜV approval, if you heard about that). With so many choices and no restrictions, why ST and not e.g. Tein?
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 05:46 PM   #38
Yoshoobaroo
TRACKBREAD
 
Yoshoobaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,033 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Garage
The Teins have higher spring rates 6/6 in their soft setup and 7/7 on the track focused one. ST X springs are 50% stiffer than OEM, that seems like a nice increase, but not too much for comfort. The other reason is that if I'm going for one of the $1000 coilovers setups, I'll take the one that is TUV certified (I grew up in Belgium, so I'm familiar with TUV). As far as I know, ST is the only budget coilover kit that is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
My choice is limited here, as every part I install on the car needs technical approval (TÜV approval, if you heard about that). With so many choices and no restrictions, why ST and not e.g. Tein?
Yoshoobaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2017, 08:44 PM   #39
Qc86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86 M6
Location: Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 103
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Bringing old tread back, noob question, compare to other coilovers how do you adjust the height? From what i see the preload of the spring would be affected or is it only the helper spring that does the work? Looking between this and the fortune auto 6 series with roller bearing. Only concern is that the st doesnt have the roller bearing and spring rate is a little bit softer. Looking to do DD, but more autocross and time attack oriented
Qc86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2017, 09:49 PM   #40
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qc86 View Post
Bringing old tread back, noob question, compare to other coilovers how do you adjust the height? From what i see the preload of the spring would be affected or is it only the helper spring that does the work? Looking between this and the fortune auto 6 series with roller bearing. Only concern is that the st doesnt have the roller bearing and spring rate is a little bit softer. Looking to do DD, but more autocross and time attack oriented
What does preload even mean? Of what value does it add?

To answer your question, yes the spring will be 'loose' when the car is in the air if you decide to lower it. You are basically moving the spring perch and as such altering the 'preload' of the spring for lack of a better descriptor. In this car it is common for this design to have essentially 'zero pre-load' on the main spring when the car is off the ground and the suspension is at full droop unless a softer progressive rate spring is used like say on Bilstein B14/B16.

The tender ("helper") spring is super soft and doesn't do anything other than keep the main spring from rattling around when the car is off the ground. With the car on the ground they will be fully compressed and solid.

I don't think you will go wrong with one kit vs the other from where you're at, just don't expect either to be the perfect setup as you go down the path of learning to drive the car at it's limits and tinker to improve it. Seriously, either one will do fine if you must have them. Maybe ask locally if there's someone with one or the other you can ride in, that may be the deciding factor and is a great deal more informative than just about ANY forum post.

I'd highly reccommend going to autox and track day with the suspension stock before you toss it out in case you haven't already, closing in on 3 years autocrossing and I still have much to learn from the stock 86 but dove into modifying too early.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
Qc86 (10-04-2017)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Moore Sport Front Camber Plates & Rear Top Mounts Scracho Canada Classifieds 10 04-21-2018 03:59 PM
FS: RCE Tarmac 2 Clubsport coilovers, Ground Control Camber Plates/rear mounts gatorac Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 5 08-25-2015 01:31 PM
MK1 front adjustable camber plates h4nh Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 5 11-22-2013 04:57 PM
Adjustable Camber Arms vs. Whiteline Camber Bushings digital_assassin Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 70 06-02-2013 06:06 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.