|
||||||
| Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#29 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I didn't have the V1 in my hands, but as you said. KW themselves confirmed it for you that they use inserts. That inserts are from Al-ko I have from the German GT86 forum. The Greddy dampers look identical to the XTA. If choosing between those, I would go for the Greddy due to the 6/7 spring rates and leave the swaybars stock.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Glorious BRZ Master Race
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I sprayed my XTAs with grease. So far they look like new (greasy ) coilovers, driving them over the summer and fall.I am not so sure it's such a big problem though considering the price. Probably the dampers will be shot long before rust becomes a major issue. For the price, I consider them a discardable once the dampers need rebuilding.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
TRACKBREAD
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,033 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
|
Did you get most of the front camber from the slot on the shock body or from the camber plate? I'm thinking if I should go for the regular coils or the XTA, especially now that they seem to use the same wet fill cartridge. I've had both on.my BMWs, ST X on my E92, and ST XTA on my E46. The XTA was too harsh for DD IMO and I did not take advantage of the rebound adjustment enough to warrant it. I'm not after a big drop either(~15mm). My only worry is getting enough camber up front without the plates. If that's no problem, I would rather spend the difference on sway bars.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Quote:
The rest of your message I am having difficulty to read. Which "regular coilovers" do you mean? If you mean the ST (without XTA), then the dampers are not the same at all. There is no cartridge in the XTAs. After owning the XTAs for some time now, my main complaint is the lack of compression adjustability. For track, I would really have liked to have that option now. Hence, after all... I wouldn't recommend the XTA any longer. If looking for something for a street driven car, go for something that is more comfortable. KW V3 or Tein or something like that. For track, something higher end. Or as entry level minimum KW V3 level and upwards (You live and learn).
__________________
Last edited by Tor; 04-27-2017 at 04:27 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
TRACKBREAD
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,033 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
|
Sorry about the confusion there. By regular coilovers I meant the basic ST coilovers (ST X is the right name I think). When I typed cartridge I didn't mean that word haha. I meant that since the ST X are now wet fill, like the XTA (if I understood that right), there is not much benefit to the XTAs besides the spring rates, rebound adjustment, and camber plates. To top it off, the ST X should be more comfortable with the 4kg/mm spring up front vs the 6kg/mm in the XTA.
If you'd recommend the V3, then I think the ST X should be a good bet since they share spring rates with the V1/V2/V3, but they're much cheaper. Thanks for the info on the camber! I think I'll go with the ST X coilovers and the ST sway bars. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |||||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
TRACKBREAD
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,033 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
|
The Teins have higher spring rates 6/6 in their soft setup and 7/7 on the track focused one. ST X springs are 50% stiffer than OEM, that seems like a nice increase, but not too much for comfort. The other reason is that if I'm going for one of the $1000 coilovers setups, I'll take the one that is TUV certified (I grew up in Belgium, so I'm familiar with TUV). As far as I know, ST is the only budget coilover kit that is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86 M6
Location: Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 103
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
Bringing old tread back, noob question, compare to other coilovers how do you adjust the height? From what i see the preload of the spring would be affected or is it only the helper spring that does the work? Looking between this and the fortune auto 6 series with roller bearing. Only concern is that the st doesnt have the roller bearing and spring rate is a little bit softer. Looking to do DD, but more autocross and time attack oriented
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
|
Quote:
To answer your question, yes the spring will be 'loose' when the car is in the air if you decide to lower it. You are basically moving the spring perch and as such altering the 'preload' of the spring for lack of a better descriptor. In this car it is common for this design to have essentially 'zero pre-load' on the main spring when the car is off the ground and the suspension is at full droop unless a softer progressive rate spring is used like say on Bilstein B14/B16. The tender ("helper") spring is super soft and doesn't do anything other than keep the main spring from rattling around when the car is off the ground. With the car on the ground they will be fully compressed and solid. I don't think you will go wrong with one kit vs the other from where you're at, just don't expect either to be the perfect setup as you go down the path of learning to drive the car at it's limits and tinker to improve it. Seriously, either one will do fine if you must have them. Maybe ask locally if there's someone with one or the other you can ride in, that may be the deciding factor and is a great deal more informative than just about ANY forum post. I'd highly reccommend going to autox and track day with the suspension stock before you toss it out in case you haven't already, closing in on 3 years autocrossing and I still have much to learn from the stock 86 but dove into modifying too early.
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post: | Qc86 (10-04-2017) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Moore Sport Front Camber Plates & Rear Top Mounts | Scracho | Canada Classifieds | 10 | 04-21-2018 03:59 PM |
| FS: RCE Tarmac 2 Clubsport coilovers, Ground Control Camber Plates/rear mounts | gatorac | Brakes, Suspension, Chassis | 5 | 08-25-2015 01:31 PM |
| MK1 front adjustable camber plates | h4nh | Brakes, Suspension, Chassis | 5 | 11-22-2013 04:57 PM |
| Adjustable Camber Arms vs. Whiteline Camber Bushings | digital_assassin | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 70 | 06-02-2013 06:06 AM |