follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List
jpit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2012, 11:40 PM   #211
eriktherod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S Firestorm Red MT
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 529
Thanks: 199
Thanked 219 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I agree, impressive gains from a part that wasn't considered highly restrictive, least not compared to the header. The K20 sure was fun to do bolt-ons with, but I still don't think it made these kinds of gains simply from an exhaust.
__________________
2013 Scion FR-S Firestorm Red MT
eriktherod is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to eriktherod For This Useful Post:
Jason@Nameless (06-24-2012)
Old 06-23-2012, 11:41 PM   #212
Mr.Jay
Senior Member
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: FRS :D
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 545
Thanked 699 Times in 438 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coheed View Post
I think those are great gains for just an exhaust system/header. But it does show that there are some limitation to what you can gain, and I'm not seeing the gains on the top end like I want to.

Of course, this just means there is more restriction elsewhere. I'm just used to seeing higher output from engines rated at 200hp. this engine should be making 170whp easily in stock form. Sigh.

I feel there is going to be a lot of gains with ECU tuning and some bigger upgrades. Bolt ons are probably only going to get you to 180whp before you need a tune. After that, you may see 200whp max... all speculation of course.

Good work jason, I enjoy your posts immensely.
All of this only makes sense if testing both cars on the same dyno

Bet if you had dynod your stock Sentra on a Mustang you wouldn't of gotten those numbers

I'm more interested in how much smoother the power can get rather than max power and I love how much info Nameless shares with us

I will deff buy something from you guys hell maybe even drive down there one of these days

the gains really are impressive IMO when compared to past NA boxers
__________________
Out of the FRS game
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 11:58 PM   #213
Coheed
Senior Member
 
Coheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: DGM BRZ Limited
Location: Seattle
Posts: 813
Thanks: 209
Thanked 225 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Jay View Post
All of this only makes sense if testing both cars on the same dyno

Bet if you had dynod your stock Sentra on a Mustang you wouldn't of gotten those numbers


the gains really are impressive IMO when compared to past NA boxers
Actually this sentra made that power on a mustang style dynomite dyno. A stock civic SI (K&N air filter only) made 180whp for comparison. Turbo, i make 510+whp on the dynojet, but only 470whp on this dynomite. It's a heartbreaker dyno for sure.

All things considered, the BRZ is only 20hp off of the stock RX8 which was highly overrated from factory.
Coheed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 04:26 AM   #214
jedibow
post whore extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt Grey FR-S 2003 Evo 8
Location: Land of drama looking for a way out
Posts: 456
Thanks: 177
Thanked 114 Times in 73 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coheed View Post
I made 170whp in my bone stock SR20VE in my sentra. The motor was rated at 187hp with 10.3:1 compression. I guess I was spoiled.

I think the output is great for a factory engine, but it should still be around 175whp dynojet in factory form. Perhaps it needs more breaking in.

I'm used to seeing stock civic SI putting out 180+whp stock, and I was hoping for a bit more pep. luckily, unlike my ve, aftermarket support for the fa20 will be awesome.

I'd like to see cams, and intake mani added on. I'll be excited to see these engines making 250whp.
The VE was and still is one of the best flowing heads ever designed, yes I would have to say that you were very spoiled. I would also like to point out that the SR20VE did not have to be limited by the current emmisions restrictions that the FA20 has to deal with. This engine is fantastic, look how flat the torque curve is, and how well it breaths up top. I think that we should be patient and see where company's like nameless take this platform and not start the whole "Mazda cheeted me because the RX-8 is rated at 238 bhp, and I only see 175 at the wheels." The renesis is a great engine, and so far so is the FA20.
jedibow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 04:35 AM   #215
Mr.Jay
Senior Member
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: FRS :D
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 545
Thanked 699 Times in 438 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coheed View Post
Actually this sentra made that power on a mustang style dynomite dyno. A stock civic SI (K&N air filter only) made 180whp for comparison. Turbo, i make 510+whp on the dynojet, but only 470whp on this dynomite. It's a heartbreaker dyno for sure.

All things considered, the BRZ is only 20hp off of the stock RX8 which was highly overrated from factory.
wow colour me impressed
__________________
Out of the FRS game
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 05:14 AM   #216
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coheed View Post
Actually this sentra made that power on a mustang style dynomite dyno. A stock civic SI (K&N air filter only) made 180whp for comparison.
RWD cars have bigger losses of energy on power/drive train than FWD cars. That is why you see the drop from the rated 200 hp, to less than the 180 WHP for the SI.
Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 10:26 AM   #217
Illusive
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2005 Subaru STi
Location: Sealy, TX
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Famous quote from dynojet

"it doesn't matter if it stated horsepower or alligators, at the end of the day does the car have more alligators than when you started."

I think too many people get caught up in the peak torque and peak hp readings. What really matters is that dyno's are tuning and diagnostic tools. You have to weigh the gains against the baseline.

Back on topic, excellent gains Nameless.
Illusive is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Illusive For This Useful Post:
Alias (06-24-2012), lantsalot (05-18-2017), Surok (03-04-2013)
Old 06-24-2012, 12:26 PM   #218
Jason@Nameless
Senior Member
 
Jason@Nameless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '88 BMW 535is Turbo
Location: La Center, WA
Posts: 287
Thanks: 119
Thanked 822 Times in 156 Posts
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Finally digging into the datalogs. Been a bit of a hassle to get my favorite log viewer to work with the formatting of the CSV's output by Auterra's DynoScan OBDII Application, but I'm getting it working pretty well. So far, I'm throroughly impressed with the high pressure fuel pump on these cars. Seeing max fuel rail pressure in the 3000psi range. That's pretty hefty as far as direct injection pumps go...

Unfortunately the data acquisition rate of the Auterra is piss poor. Not sure if that's just the OBDII refresh rate or the number of data points that I am collecting. Will do some further testing today to see how rapid of a refresh rate I can get. After perusing the logs there are certain items I was logging that are consistent enough to not have to watch anymore (LTFT, STFT, etc).

J
Jason@Nameless is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason@Nameless For This Useful Post:
ill86 (06-26-2012)
Old 06-25-2012, 03:26 PM   #219
Jason@Nameless
Senior Member
 
Jason@Nameless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '88 BMW 535is Turbo
Location: La Center, WA
Posts: 287
Thanks: 119
Thanked 822 Times in 156 Posts
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Ok so we just got the car off the dyno this morning (tested the same design as previously tested, but without the midpipe) and the car is making the exact same power as before. I'll have the graphs here shortly to compare. So good news and bad news. Bad news is that the car didn't pick up any extra power over the weekend. Good news is, you don't need a midpipe to make this level of power.

Now, on top of this discussion, we have been working with a number of Australian customers and frequenting their message boards for the GT86 as well as some of the ECU Tuning forums and there have been some rumors of the torque dip being exaggerated on the dyno vs. on the street based on the load that the dyno puts onto the car vs. the load the car sees on the street. If that is the case, then there may be some increase power from ECU learning that doesn't translate to the dyno, but again, that's total speculation and it should be an equal improvement no matter what system you run.

Next steps on this car are to work on some more designs including our intake as well as getting a catless version of this stepped header tested out on the car asap. We have also been discussing some other, rather wild, options for the car that we'll share after we get another look under the car to evaluate the feasibility of the routing for these alternate header designs. We have also investigated the feasibility of getting the maximum amount of power out of the car by having an alternate exhaust length (electric cutout or race day side exit design). The tuned length of the primaries and secondaries on the header as well as the collector diameters are not the only dial to turn in order to bias torque, midrange or high end horsepower. The collector and muffler/tailpipe combo harmonics also have the ability to impact power levels. But we're talking exhausts that are half of the length of the car vs. anything the full length.

More to come.

Jason
Jason@Nameless is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jason@Nameless For This Useful Post:
ill86 (06-26-2012), Starscream15 (06-25-2012), Surok (03-04-2013)
Old 06-25-2012, 03:29 PM   #220
Jason@Nameless
Senior Member
 
Jason@Nameless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '88 BMW 535is Turbo
Location: La Center, WA
Posts: 287
Thanks: 119
Thanked 822 Times in 156 Posts
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Another thing to ask at this point is what directions the community would like to see us go based on the results we have currently seen in these designs. What are your thoughts on sound vs. weight, etc. We can get more power out of these cars at the cost of sound, without a doubt. Our goal is to develop the lightest weight, best sounding compromise of designs but if there is a significant division in the market between people wanting maximum power and torque vs. streetability, we have no qualms with splitting our development accordingly.

So please, by all means, chime in with your applications, your use of the car and the requirements therein so that we can determine how to divide and conquer for different segments of the market.

Jason
Jason@Nameless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2012, 03:39 PM   #221
Lost
Senior Member
 
Lost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Carless...
Location: SC
Posts: 174
Thanks: 129
Thanked 43 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I am definitely in the "add a few pounds to make it sound better" camp. That said, I think it sounds really good right now. Again, thanks for sharing all this information. It has put you guys at the top of my list if I ever actually get my car...
Lost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2012, 03:43 PM   #222
Tainen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: First SWP BRZ-L
Location: Washington
Posts: 809
Thanks: 154
Thanked 350 Times in 174 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wanna see that resonator welded on and see a dyno graph, see if it 1) improves sound/makes it quietter 2) makes any more power. It needs to accomplish the first in order to be a really great daily driver type of exhaust/header combo for most customers, imo. If it accomplishes the 2nd, then... it's just even more awesome.

Cheers for having the fastest consumer owned BRZ in the country so far! (I'm ignoring the drift frankencars hah)
__________________
First white BRZ in the country
Limited SWP BRZ, 35% tint, clear bra, Nameless Performance downpipe, axelback, headers
Tainen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2012, 03:51 PM   #223
phm14
Loves the Smell of Track
 
phm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: '13 86
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 397
Thanks: 297
Thanked 142 Times in 90 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I'm running the axleback only, and wouldn't want it any louder for street. Wouldn't bother me if it was a bit softer as long as it wasn't more restrictive. An extra pound or two isn't super critical since I'm not racing the car. My AB is only ~7lbs lighter than the stock unit as is.
__________________
2020 86 Hakone MT build thread: https://www.ft86club.com/forums/show...31#post3326231
2013 Toyobaru 86/FR-S 6MT, Red, aka Candy O SOLD
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7934
phm14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2012, 04:10 PM   #224
uspspro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: DGM BRZ, MR-S 3.5L V6 swap (sold)
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 602
Thanks: 28
Thanked 188 Times in 121 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Honestly, I would be happy with the full setup you have on Tainen's car with a resonator (or other sound tuning devices) to ensure low amounts of drone and reduce the little rasp.
uspspro is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
21 months no dyno, 22 months no vendor dyno, 22months4rattles&leakssmh, amazing warped qualiy, y u no tag


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nameless Performance BRZ Axleback Exhaust ESBjiujitsu Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 1377 04-21-2020 03:23 AM
Nameless Performance Axleback is available for pre-order. Nameless Performance Inc. Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 114 07-23-2012 11:38 PM
Nameless Performance Downpipe is available for pre-order. Nameless Performance Inc. Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 4 07-12-2012 05:57 PM
We are Nameless Performance. John@Nameless Announcements, Contests, Giveaways 22 06-19-2012 12:32 AM
Nameless Performance is here. Nameless Performance Inc. Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 16 06-06-2012 05:32 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.