follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-21-2012, 11:44 AM   #29
Jason@Nameless
Senior Member
 
Jason@Nameless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '88 BMW 535is Turbo
Location: La Center, WA
Posts: 287
Thanks: 119
Thanked 822 Times in 156 Posts
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillieRX View Post
Modern day fuel injected engines really don't need aftermarket intakes for performance. The stock one developed by the engineers are actually pretty darn good these days. Also, it has metal plumbing, which will retain engine heat more then the stock plastic plumbing, and increasing intake temperatures. That is not something you want, and probably will hurt performance more then help. Also, modern day mass airflow setups seem to be quite picky, and adjusting the plumbing from the stock setup could affect A/F ratios.

I think all you need is a good panel filter (like the TRD one). I still have the stock air-box and intake plumbing on my WRX, and have the STi panel filter. I plan on keeping the stock intake setup even after I throw on a bigger turbo and intercooler, etc... because the stock one is pretty darn good and can handle 400+ HP without issue.
This really depends on the car. Our intake on the Kia Optima Turbo (Speed Density from the Factory!!) makes 11whp/13tq over a baseline with a panel K&N filter (and it uses the panel filter - just the piping for the intake makes 11/13). Most intakes and turbo inlet pipes on Mazdaspeed3's crest over the 25hp mark. A simple cat delete and intake I designed for the MS3 at my last job made 52ftlb of torque. Just depends on the car really. Our intake prototype for the STi makes quite a bit of power with the proper tune, where the factory unit gains less with a similar tune. N/A is a whole different story - much harder to build power, but most people want a good sound on the car and induction is always a fun direction to go for that. I dig the speed density cars, you can run a massive 3 or 4 step reduction from a 4" filter to a 2.25" throttle body or turbo inlet and really build a lot more power than stock.

As for MAF tuning and getting the diameter and MAF placement right, it is very finicky. After designing 7-8 different setups though, you get to be able to intuit a design. Some simple computational flow dynamics software also helps. I was working with my old employer on the Mazda SkyActiv MAF housing design for their new intakes and I was able to get within 3% of our long term fuel trim goals on this first try. That was with a billet MAF housing, which is pretty much necessary to get repeatable results. Welded MAF bosses seem to be a good way to induce variability into a system like that.

Also, your comments about metal vs. plastic are not terribly accurate. I've done the tests back to back with four channel thermocouple dataloggers and there is negligible difference (standard deviation at best) between stainless, aluminum and plastic or rubber. All heat soak over time in the engine bay. And even at wide open throttle with an office full of air being ingested by the car every few minutes, the intlet air temperatures of an intake drawing outside of the engine bay air doesn't change markedly by a material change at the intake. That may be different if you had, say, a 32" long .25" wall aluminum intake, but stainless or silicone vs. thin wall abs is functionally a wash.

N/A cars are most certainly a hell of a lot trickier to make power on an intake. It's not to say that many of us aren't up to the challenge though.

Would be so much cooler if there was no MAF. Speed Density FTMFW!

J
Jason@Nameless is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jason@Nameless For This Useful Post:
Fly Guy (06-22-2012), ill86 (06-21-2012), WillieRX (06-21-2012)
Old 06-21-2012, 12:42 PM   #30
WillieRX
Mountain Road Recon
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '06 Subaru WRX TR
Location: Mountains, CO
Posts: 26
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
^Coming from you, it actually means something. Nameless is one of the few companies with a good reputation that I actually notice.


Like you said, depends on the car. I have probably been immersed too much in the WRX crowd on the very heated debate on whether the stock intake or aftermarket intake is better. However, i still cant bring myself to trust a metal intake...


I was thinking very similar to the MAF setup.


Thanks for your explanation.
WillieRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 01:37 PM   #31
ill86
VehicleDynamicsSpecialist
 
ill86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: iG FR-S
Location: illtuned / PittRace
Posts: 750
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 203 Times in 166 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift Racing Technologies View Post
they literally took less than an hour designing the intake for this car..

but it is HKS so you will pay a premium, bend over and smile at the same tim.
How do you even state this as fact? Do you work for HKS Japan?

If someone wants to pay the price that's their own business. I personally like brands like HKS and ARC. People used to bitch about their costs too.. But, again, nobody is forcing anyone to purchase the parts. We should be happy there is strong support from companies such as HKS.

I hope you do offer a nice kit and I'm not knocking your ability. To be honest you are coming off as pretty rude or harsh about it. It is an intake kit. It provides a metal pipe and filter for the oem box. Some folks actually want this style.
ill86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2012, 07:53 PM   #32
xcelir8brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,029
Thanks: 45
Thanked 235 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by igorot View Post
This is perfect (i.e. do a noise generator delete). The sound will provide a bit more growl.
xcelir8brz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Short ram Intake/CAI ? QC-FRS Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 12 02-01-2014 08:02 PM
cold air intake? carbonBLUE Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 72 09-30-2013 12:56 PM
FRS AEM Cold Air Intake KenAEM Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 28 10-24-2012 12:48 PM
Does anyone have pictures of TRD intake Pekingduck Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 2 04-26-2012 10:37 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.