07-09-2016, 03:26 AM | #1345 | |
86
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: 2015 Toyota GT86 MT UEL E85 RSR CWP
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,293
Thanks: 3,553
Thanked 4,850 Times in 2,166 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
After I upgraded IAM still didn't work, looks like this is when the FLKC changed too.. |
|
07-09-2016, 03:37 AM | #1346 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It's not more conservative, it has more cam advance in a lot of areas. WOT is exactly the same. You will just need to try it to feel of its any better or not.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post: | fibble (07-09-2016) |
07-09-2016, 08:40 AM | #1347 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2015 86 GTS
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 41
Thanks: 13
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
07-12-2016, 08:50 PM | #1348 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 86 A00I
Location: AUS
Posts: 41
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
OFT + PhantomESC: serious lean problem under boost
I hope one of you technical tune pro's will be able to help me out here. I've been logging some recent city/ highway drives and noticed that in about 30% of instances of activating the ESC (ie, applying 2-4psi boost to the intake manifold) the AFR runs wildly up into the 15-17 area.
Command AFR during these events stays where it should be, down around the high 11's. So it's like the underlying program in the tune is right but the actuality of what the injectors, sensors ,etc are doing doesn't correspond. See this log, the first two boost events run reasonably safely, then the third goes apeshit at first but it appears some sort of correction occurs (with 0% STFT) that brings the AFR down closer to the Command AFR. http://datazap.me/u/dtek/01-7-16-91o...3281-3704-4020 Another instance where it stays in Closed loop throughout the boost addition, the AFR is a little high but you can see the STFT skyrockets to offset the added air coming in. http://datazap.me/u/dtek/11-7-16-pac...3392&mark=3322 A scenario where it's in Open loop, and the AFR stays fairly well behaved. http://datazap.me/u/dtek/11-7-16-pac...mark=3322-8179 Another instance of Closed Loop holding semi decent AFR but STFT goes to the moon trying to enrichen. http://datazap.me/u/dtek/11-7-16-fre...5-433&mark=368 An Open Loop which loses the plot completely, yet IAM and flkc stay clear like there's no detected knock or any concerns: http://datazap.me/u/dtek/11-7-16-fre...1494&mark=1431 This tune began as Shiv's official ESC tune for the USA market 'G' rom, and was copied over in RR to suit my ROM. Haven't scaled the MAF, but when I plugged in these logs into the mafscaling-2.2.6 software, the CL chart created a crazy bump of 30-40% higher from 2.9V to 3.5V. My suspicion is that Load Limits need to be tweaked and the MAF scale must need some attention. Perhaps the OL>CL transition needs adjusting. I wonder if there is some table in RR that bases fueling on the Manifold Air Pressure that could be used to specifically target fuel added based on MAP > 0.75 or something. Any help appreciated. -- Has Shiv released an updated ESC tune since the very first one way back when the 1.5 dump kits were just released? I can't find any OTS tune for ESC from him on the official website. -- Last edited by dtek; 07-12-2016 at 09:58 PM. Reason: Afterthought |
07-13-2016, 12:19 AM | #1349 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
US ROMS are denoted with C/D, so I don't know what you're doing.
|
07-13-2016, 04:09 AM | #1350 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 86 A00I
Location: AUS
Posts: 41
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Come on Wayno, my memory from about 2 years ago when I first downloaded Shiv's ESC tune wasn't crystal clear so yes you're 110% right, it was actually a C tune now that I've refreshed the memory. Top marks, gold star for you mate. Really hit the nail on the head.
Now that the ego has been appeased, and nits have been picked. Any interest in tapping into your know how and being so generous as to give some input on the actual tuning aspect of the thread? |
07-13-2016, 04:25 AM | #1351 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
07-13-2016, 04:49 AM | #1352 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 86 A00I
Location: AUS
Posts: 41
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
FYI it's an A00I and yes Im in 'straya like you. Why those two factors are really a relevant concern escapes me though. The Defs used were the most up to date available at the time, but I'll make a point to go revisit the tune comparison with the current most recent defs and see if I can find any new tables. I've even done side by side comparisons between Shiv's OTS tune (91RON C ROM to his ESC 91RON C ROM) and I can't see any clear differential that speaks to where he adds/tweaks specifically for boost. Yes there's some differences but certainly not intuitive or logical. I was hoping that one of the forced induction tuning guys would weigh in here with actual experience with that aspect of tuning. Since the one common denominator in the problematic AFRs is only when boost is applied. |
|
07-13-2016, 05:57 AM | #1353 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If porting changes between rom calid i usually do this 1. compare say a stock A01C or whatever the source rom is with the modded source rom of same calid say A01C. Note the names of all the tables changed. dont try to directly copy from say a C to G series as you dont know which tables to change and which to leave alone 2. Then open the destination and source roms with compatible definitions ie make sure ones not metric and one imperial and carefully copy across ONLY those tables you noted different in step 1. Carefully check both the source and destination tables BEFORE you copy to see the x and y axis are consistent in both the source and destination tables , the x and y axis should be same only the contents of the table should differ there are some errors in defs. Traps and pitfalls Do NOT copy tables if the x and y axis dont match between source and destination tables either weird stuff will happen or ecu may be bricked. Other traps are tables can be named slightly differenty between roms of different calid. Their will be differences in say a stock C series and G series rom due country specific changes to roms DO NOT copy these over, this is the purpose of step 1 ,to find what the tuner changes from stock on the same rom calid. If you cannot match table names or the tables look different then be exceedingly careful and research why this is. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | dtek (07-13-2016) |
07-13-2016, 06:42 AM | #1354 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 86 A00I
Location: AUS
Posts: 41
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
As to the steps to convert Roms, thanks Steve... I have for quite some time basically followed that approach, and just now have re-checked using Shiv's most recent XML defs and the only tables missing in my tune are several of the P000X check box on-off type of ones. My understanding from reading on here, is that different ROMs have different levels of firmware(?) when it comes to those tables and there's not much I can do about that. One peculiar thing is, I cross-compared Shiv's v2.10 A00I xml def file with Wayno's WW v106 2016-06-16 A00I xml file and there's significant differences. Shiv's is 800kb in size and 8000+ lines of code, whereas Wayno's is 569kb and 6500 lines of code. I obviously didn't pick through each line by line but seems there's some pretty major differences in there... |
|
07-13-2016, 07:29 AM | #1355 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
yes for example the usa roms have the evap contol system ective whre our roms dont use evap its not wired in and disabled in our roms good if you want to use flex kits |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | dtek (07-14-2016) |
07-13-2016, 10:07 AM | #1356 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
You can use my defs if you like. They are matched between different definitions, so long as the C series you are copying are based on B01C.
OFT C Series Definitions - Based on B01C OFT I Series Definition - Based on A01I There is a table called Port Injection MRP Compensation that will impact the PI under positive pressure. All load limits etc are defined.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
07-13-2016, 03:38 PM | #1357 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: Silver 2013 BRZ Ltd Auto 45,000 mi
Location: Vancouver, WA.USA
Posts: 965
Thanks: 86
Thanked 451 Times in 277 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Here are some tunes, PROcede maps, and a definition to try
Quote:
I've been working on my tunes to try to better harness the power of the ESC. Starting with a smooth, progressive AVCS map, I added shr133's PI/DI tables with only slight changes. With an open exhaust, the AVCS advance has to be drastically reduced, which fights against my instincts. But, less noise is actually more power. It also handles boost better. I've also included the Wayno def I used, several PROcede maps, the Shiv's original OTS v2.072 91 Octane stage 2 UEL tune I copied the changes to, so you can compare before and after. There are 3 tunes included with 3 different AVCS tables between them. This lets you try them and pick the one that suits your individual Intake/Exhaust restrictions best. I'm currently using the "B" PROcede map, which is stronger, but it works fine with the "AB" PROcede map as well. It's called the 40-20 tune because it gets 40 highway mpg, and 20 city. Economical cruising, but with gas-guzzling acceleration when you need it.
__________________
If I say yes, will that make you think I understand?
Last edited by KoolBRZ; 07-13-2016 at 04:30 PM. |
|
07-13-2016, 06:41 PM | #1358 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2015 brz
Location: markham
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
can someone take a look at this for me? i just want to make sure my car is running good no damage to anytthing thanks!
http://www.datazap.me/u/carewyip/log...data=1-8-11-12 |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RGM Supercharged 86 performance data | TheGooseman | AFRICA | 14 | 12-13-2014 01:15 AM |
Interpreting Ecutek Data Logs? | cuddefred | Software Tuning | 3 | 09-02-2013 12:55 PM |
VIR - Impressions/Pics/Logs/Video (Track Daze) | swift996 | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 39 | 08-30-2013 09:21 AM |
Noise tube delete air/fuel logs? | jm1681 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 13 | 10-17-2012 04:57 PM |
ECU Data Logger | Motordyne | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 5 | 07-18-2012 09:27 AM |