2017 Toyota 86 - new name, styling, and more power

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by KalbiCool88

But it does look more consistent

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

Looks pretty much like every stock dyno I have ever seen.

[KalbiCool88]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

Looks pretty much like every stock dyno I have ever seen.

I thought ours was more spotty on the torque curve . maybe I'm seeing things lol

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by KalbiCool88

I thought ours was more spotty on the torque curve . maybe I'm seeing things lol

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

Well the line will vary depending on the dyno accuracy.
I for one think that the graphs make the dip look way worse that it really is when driving. I pass through it in a fraction of a second so barely even notice it.

[Braeden]

I was reading somewhere, cannot find the article so take it with a grain of salt, that everyone is offended by the 5hp gain, but you'll actually be achieving a great wheel horsepower than the first generation. Would be quite interesting and with the gear ratios being modified possible better acceleration times?

[DatsunDimer]

Based on the charts @Tcoat posted, there seems to be top end HP difference. That amount seems to be inline with what Moto stated about the changes to WHP. Interesting...

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by DatsunDimer

Based on the charts @Tcoat posted, they seems to be a big top end HP difference. That amount seems to be inline with what Moto stated about WHP. Interesting...

Those are old ones. Just was comparing to the ones on the gauge cluster from the 17 to show the dip was still there. There can be a large difference in each graph anyway since some dynos read higher or lower than others. No idea how accurate the gauge is either so we really don't know a whole lot more yet (other than the dip still shows on the BRZ pamphlet).
Who knows maybe the pics were from one with the new gauges but still an old engine.

[nikitopo]

Depends also on the scale of the graph. For sure the dip is still there.

[raven1231]

Originally Posted by KalbiCool88

I'd wait for the actual test drive reviews...

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

This, and actual dynos from third party shops.

[Dadhawk]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

I for one think that the graphs make the dip look way worse that it really is when driving. I pass through it in a fraction of a second so barely even notice it.

Same here, I'm either usually below it or above it, rarely in the worst part of it unless just passing quickly from one to the other. it is probably most impactful in the 0-60 times more than anything else.

[raven1231]

Originally Posted by Dadhawk

Same here, I'm either usually below it or above it, rarely in the worst part of it unless just passing quickly from one to the other. it is probably most impactful in the 0-60 times more than anything else.

But 0-60 is life. How else will magazine racers compare cars

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by raven1231

But 0-60 is life. How else will magazine racers compare cars

By HP numbers. Don't be silly.


936HP must be fast!

[nikitopo]

I prefer power-to-weight ratio. It's not perfect, but it can give you a feeling

[Ashikabi]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

By HP numbers. Don't be silly.


936HP must be fast!

Those torque numbers doe

[FR-S Future Owner]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

I for one think that the graphs make the dip look way worse that it really is when driving. I pass through it in a fraction of a second so barely even notice it.

Originally Posted by Dadhawk

Same here, I'm either usually below it or above it, rarely in the worst part of it unless just passing quickly from one to the other. it is probably most impactful in the 0-60 times more than anything else.

So you've not opted for the frequently discussed torque dip header & tune mods?