follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB

Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB Problems, issues, recalls, TSBs

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2016, 04:01 PM   #1
BDKane01
Senior Member
 
BDKane01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 2016 Subaru BRZ Limited CWP MT
Location: VA
Posts: 178
Thanks: 111
Thanked 70 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
90 octane ethanol-free fuel vs Shell 93 Nitro+ V-Power crickets

My '16 BRZ limited has the engine chipping as of 3600 miles. I had always filled it up with Shell 93 octane fuel. Particularly in the AM in my commute they get louder on 93. I fill up at the same 1 of 3 gas stations every week.


I filled up on 90 octane ethanol free fuel yesterday at a Mallard station. So far the crickets are nearly non existent on that gas. I am unsure of the performance between them or MPG.


I'm not really noticing difference at all. Is there supposed to be a performance change in between the fuels?
__________________
Hindsight is 20/20
BDKane01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 04:33 PM   #2
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDKane01 View Post
My '16 BRZ limited has the engine chipping as of 3600 miles. I had always filled it up with Shell 93 octane fuel. Particularly in the AM in my commute they get louder on 93. I fill up at the same 1 of 3 gas stations every week.


I filled up on 90 octane ethanol free fuel yesterday at a Mallard station. So far the crickets are nearly non existent on that gas. I am unsure of the performance between them or MPG.


I'm not really noticing difference at all. Is there supposed to be a performance change in between the fuels?
There will be a drop in performance since the ECU will pull timing to prevent knock. It will however be gradual not instant so you may never even notice the drop.


Not sure how big an issue running 90 would be but the minimum requirement according to the manual is 91.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
chaoskaze (06-08-2016), mdm (06-08-2016)
Old 06-08-2016, 05:16 PM   #3
ka-t_240
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 973
Thanks: 124
Thanked 328 Times in 237 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Run 91+


It doesn't matter what gas you run, you will ge the crickets. People claim that ethonal free gas solves it, but from experience it does not. I had the pump relaced under warranty. I planned and only used ethonal free fuel for 4-5 tanks prior to the replacement. Pump was quiet for the first 2-3 weeks and then they came back worse than ever. Now car is on e85 and no change.
ka-t_240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 08:46 PM   #4
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,099 Times in 3,030 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Not sure how big an issue running 90 would be but the minimum requirement according to the manual is 91.
I filled up with 90 octane 3 times on my LA > TX > LA 4000-mile trip in April. No difference in mileage that I can conclusively determine, and the car ran fine with minimal difference in drivability.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (06-08-2016)
Old 06-08-2016, 09:45 PM   #5
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 30,432
Thanks: 29,826
Thanked 32,845 Times in 16,844 Posts
Mentioned: 715 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
I filled up with 90 octane 3 times on my LA > TX > LA 4000-mile trip in April. No difference in mileage that I can conclusively determine, and the car ran fine with minimal difference in drivability.

-alex
If the engine pulled the timing a bit, to compensate for the lower octane, it might be less likely to feel on a long haul, freeway driving trip like that ....


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2016, 10:36 PM   #6
BDKane01
Senior Member
 
BDKane01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 2016 Subaru BRZ Limited CWP MT
Location: VA
Posts: 178
Thanks: 111
Thanked 70 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
There will be a drop in performance since the ECU will pull timing to prevent knock. It will however be gradual not instant so you may never even notice the drop.


Not sure how big an issue running 90 would be but the minimum requirement according to the manual is 91.
It was the only ethenol free gas octane grade. I'll be switching back thanks for the tip.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ka-t_240 View Post
Run 91+


It doesn't matter what gas you run, you will ge the crickets. People claim that ethonal free gas solves it, but from experience it does not. I had the pump relaced under warranty. I planned and only used ethonal free fuel for 4-5 tanks prior to the replacement. Pump was quiet for the first 2-3 weeks and then they came back worse than ever. Now car is on e85 and no change.
I can for sure say it did make them much much quieter. But, I'll be going back to 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
I filled up with 90 octane 3 times on my LA > TX > LA 4000-mile trip in April. No difference in mileage that I can conclusively determine, and the car ran fine with minimal difference in drivability.

-alex
I didn't notice any less performance. But, I'll be going back to 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by humfrz View Post
If the engine pulled the timing a bit, to compensate for the lower octane, it might be less likely to feel on a long haul, freeway driving trip like that ....


humfrz
I will be going back to 93 octane as soon as this tank is empty. I have noticed it is much quieter. This is not a long term thing, I just wanted to try to see if it would quiet the crickets. Which it did.
__________________
Hindsight is 20/20
BDKane01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BDKane01 For This Useful Post:
humfrz (06-09-2016), Tcoat (06-08-2016)
Old 06-08-2016, 10:37 PM   #7
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDKane01 View Post
It was the only ethenol free gas octane grade. I'll be switching back thanks for the tip.



I can for sure say it did make them much much quieter. But, I'll be going back to 93



I didn't notice any less performance. But, I'll be going back to 93



I will be going back to 93 octane as soon as this tank is empty. I have noticed it is much quieter. This is not a long term thing, I just wanted to try to see if it would quiet the crickets. Which it did.
But BD are you going back to 93?
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
cdq85 (06-10-2016)
Old 06-08-2016, 11:48 PM   #8
sly
Senior Member
 
sly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: 2016 Cosworth 2.2 BRZ
Location: TN
Posts: 335
Thanks: 88
Thanked 198 Times in 124 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
But BD are you going back to 93?
It's possible that they are but the response was quite vague...
sly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 01:10 AM   #9
chaoskaze
The Fail Boat
 
chaoskaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: CWP S.B.
Location: LasVegas
Posts: 3,028
Thanks: 4,720
Thanked 1,294 Times in 874 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
just add some cotance booster into the ethanol free 90, done.
chaoskaze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2016, 08:37 AM   #10
WNDSRFR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: FR-S,GTI
Location: Cocoa, Florida
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 235
Thanked 868 Times in 442 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ka-t_240 View Post
Run 91+


It doesn't matter what gas you run, you will ge the crickets. People claim that ethonal free gas solves it, but from experience it does not. I had the pump relaced under warranty. I planned and only used ethonal free fuel for 4-5 tanks prior to the replacement. Pump was quiet for the first 2-3 weeks and then they came back worse than ever. Now car is on e85 and no change.
This is not true at all. I've got over 80,000 miles on my car and have never heard a cricket. I almost always get gas at the same station (Sunoco 93 oct). The pump says "may contain up to 10 percent ethanol". I don't think it contains any.
WNDSRFR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WNDSRFR For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (06-09-2016)
Old 06-09-2016, 08:47 AM   #11
BDKane01
Senior Member
 
BDKane01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 2016 Subaru BRZ Limited CWP MT
Location: VA
Posts: 178
Thanks: 111
Thanked 70 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
But BD are you going back to 93?
Note to self, don't post when you're half asleep knocked up on Benadryl lol
__________________
Hindsight is 20/20
BDKane01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BDKane01 For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (06-09-2016)
Old 06-09-2016, 10:48 AM   #12
ka-t_240
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 973
Thanks: 124
Thanked 328 Times in 237 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WNDSRFR View Post
This is not true at all. I've got over 80,000 miles on my car and have never heard a cricket. I almost always get gas at the same station (Sunoco 93 oct). The pump says "may contain up to 10 percent ethanol". I don't think it contains any.


We have a guy locally who's car has been 100% silent since day one. Doesn't matter what fuel he puts in the car. Car is on its second motor as well.
ka-t_240 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Stations to fuel up that meet the 93 Octane less than 10% ethanol req. Concorazon Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 58 10-30-2015 12:34 PM
Higher Octane or Ethanol Free Chad86 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 1 03-28-2014 11:06 PM
Shell 92 Octane Bonner Southern California 1 11-18-2013 10:32 PM
Ethanol-free fuel in Northwestern WA? NWFRS Northwest 11 10-02-2013 10:23 AM
Website that locates ethanol-free fuel wbradley Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 8 07-24-2012 01:47 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.