|
||||||
| CANADA Canada |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Hoonigan
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2016 Hot Lava 6MT FR-S
Location: Surrey, BC Canada
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 229 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
This is true.. there is no reason to be ethanol hating (there is a reason why race cars and dragsters use alcohol fuel!).
Ethanol has a way higher octane rating then gas, it just doesn't have the same energy available - about 66% in fact. So your mileage will drop, because you have to use more fuel to get the same power when mixed with Ethanol.. the bonus, though is that fuel rated as say 87 octane, is actually higher when they add Ethanol. Major tuners in the states where E85 is common, prefer it for their fuel in mass power cars.. (4 digit hp).. for the massive octane ratings it has. They just need to use way bigger fuel pumps and injectors to compensate for the energy loss over straight fuel. Alcohol is hygroscopic... (it wants to absorb water from the air) which is why so many people 'hate' on ethanol. I wouldn't leave ethanol fuel sitting in a tank for a year and then expect to use it without issues.. but for daily use, today's cars are built to deal with it, and no harm is done. When you are paying so much for premium fuel, it make economic sense to avoid fuel that's ethanol blended. Another good reason to use Chevron premium fuels... the 94 pump is always a separate nozzle from the 87-91 fuel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
i'm sorry, what?
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,508 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
No chevron in Ontario
so it's either Shell 91 (which i've always liked) or Petrocan 94
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 White Scion FRS
Location: Ontario
Posts: 198
Thanks: 24
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
How about Husky?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
i'm sorry, what?
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,508 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
|
http://www.myhusky.ca/station_locato...cityID=Toronto
'There are no locations that match your search criteria." ![]()
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 hot lava FRS
Location: GTA
Posts: 142
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
shell should be not bad since Ferrari F-1 racing team use shell, and according to FIA the fuel they use in race car must be somewhat at least 90% same as the fuel selling to the public. That's what I remember when watching a TV show, need to do some research on this again.
__________________
2013 FRS
2000 S2000 2004 RSX-S 2002 RSX |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: ~_~
Location: Toronto
Posts: 831
Thanks: 27
Thanked 190 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,086
Thanks: 526
Thanked 1,614 Times in 726 Posts
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
|
Ethanol blended fuels will not hurt modern cars. The deterioration of the fuel system was for old cars where parts of the fuel system used rubber that would slowly get eaten away.
Your car will run better on 94, using the most timing and making the most power. 91 will not hurt the car physically but it also wont make as much power. The manual asks for 93 for a reason. Any fuel above 91 octane will also use something to increase the ocatane, be it ethanol or MTB like some stateside companies use. Personally I had very good results with Husky 94 in my STI, any time i would run lesser fuel knock would start to creep up in my datalogs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 White Scion FRS
Location: Ontario
Posts: 198
Thanks: 24
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: ~_~
Location: Toronto
Posts: 831
Thanks: 27
Thanked 190 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Yeah I personally will go out of the way to find a Shell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 White Scion FRS
Location: Ontario
Posts: 198
Thanks: 24
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
Oh, the $70 a week was for regular. My Accord, which I shared, had a 70 litre tank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Drives: Scion FRS Ht Lva(AT)
Location: Alberta
Posts: 409
Thanks: 30
Thanked 81 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
see below
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|