|
||||||
| Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
| View Poll Results: ? | |||
| SC |
|
133 | 38.33% |
| TC |
|
159 | 45.82% |
| NA |
|
55 | 15.85% |
| Voters: 347. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#155 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: celica
Location: uk
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
We don't have many supercharged road cars in the uk but we have plenty of boring turbos. It sounds better!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
RaggedEdge Autosports
Join Date: Aug 2010
Drives: 97 APU Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Boring turbo's? Wow you sounded ignorant right there no offense, actually lots of offense
__________________
Red JZA80 APU Supra 800whp
White 07 Turbo Si 411whp *RIP* ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#157 | |
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I kinda understand his opinion... I don't say Turbos are boring, but I see tons of Turbo cars, so it might be interesting to see SC one. You know, just like AE86. 86 had both TC & SC aftermarket kits. Some ppl prefer TC over SC in 86, and some ppl prefer SC over TC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
non member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: none
Location: none
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The supercharger = low end torque, the Turbo = high end horsepower. I would take low end torque any day over high end horsepower as it is much more useful in day to day driving. I would rather be real world quick than race track fast unless it was an all out race car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Miata
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 186
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I vote for a Rotrex style supercharger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#160 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I believe that's not exactly true as the setup is what determines the torque range. Eg, small turbo = low RPM torque, medium turbo = mid range RPM torque, and a big turbo makes high RPM torque. The bigger the turbo and the greater the boosted pressure the longer it takes to spool. Superchargers tend to be small but that doesn't mean a small turbo isn't comparable right? Superchargers might have better response due to being directly mounted to the accessory belt but a small turbo can provide good low end torque and fairly quick response and when off boost there isn't nearly as much parasitic drag. Don't forget we're talking Direct Injection too, it'll be easier to get torque and therefore boost at lower RPMs than just a Multiport setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#161 | |
|
2 wheel member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
SC=minimal lag TC=needs oil feed line/can produce some lag/boost creep SC seems to be more exclusive to the US while the rest of the world is running TC... weird! I would prefer a turbo!! Nothing says "oh shit" better than a front mount intercooler!
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 | |
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
btw that's Raptor's SC kit for NA Impreza w aftermarket FMIC![]()
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ichitaka05 For This Useful Post: | ESBjiujitsu (07-23-2012) |
|
|
#163 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: is250
Location: san diego
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I vote for turbocharger because with a supercharger, you are going to be limited to the size of the pulley. But with a turbocharger, you can upgrade to any size turbo you want!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
RaggedEdge Autosports
Join Date: Aug 2010
Drives: 97 APU Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Yeah but if you max out the SC, just get a bigger one, same thing with the turbo, you can only go so high in boost.
__________________
Red JZA80 APU Supra 800whp
White 07 Turbo Si 411whp *RIP* ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#166 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 1995 Civic DX
Location: Fort St. John BC CAN
Posts: 557
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
:O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#167 | |
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I wonder how much $$$ owner spent on that engine itself... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
2.1L 3SGTE
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MR2 Turbo & Tacoma
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 29
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
agreed. I WANT N/A.
__________________
1991 MR2 Turbo - 2.1L high compression stroker 3SGTE
2006 Tacoma 4x4 TRD Off Road - All-Pro front bumper, Old Man Emu shocks, Old Man Emu HD front coils, All-Pro leafs 1990 240SX Coupe - sold 2008 Civic Si Sedan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Subaru 216A confirmed with 2.0L turbo, AWD, bigger and heavier than FT-86 | Hachiroku | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 118 | 11-16-2017 03:19 PM |
| 2L turbo exiga. | 86Fan | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 16 | 06-26-2010 07:36 PM |