follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2015, 03:32 AM   #1
FRed-S
Member
 
FRed-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Drives: 2015 Scion FR-S
Location: Arizona
Posts: 80
Thanks: 35
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Low Hp: Bad Gas or...

Hi all,
I had my 2015 FR-S tuned yesterday and it revealed a problem. I trust my tuner implicitly as he is an expert on this type of vehicle. My power train is stock except for the TRD hi flow air filter. The problem was the car started out on the Dyno at only 105hp which is probably about 25hp below what an automatic should be. It has been suggested that the 91 octane gas I've been putting in it may be bad. I hope so, but has anyone ever heard of this particular problem? My tuner got it up to 132hp but I am afraid there may be a bigger problem. The car seems to run without issue, even when I romp on it, but as this is my first car like this, I have no experience to base whether it has been performing properly. Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
FRed-S
Attached Images
 
FRed-S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 04:13 AM   #2
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 30,432
Thanks: 29,826
Thanked 32,845 Times in 16,844 Posts
Mentioned: 715 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
hmmmm..... 200 HP at the crank and 105 HP at the wheels ..... ??

I reckon something IS wrong with your car.

132 HP is better, but it seems it should be higher, with a good tune.

I'll shush ...... cause others know more about this than I.

However, I would also wonder about the calibration of the dyno .... ??


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 04:37 AM   #3
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,993 Times in 2,983 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
All dynos read different i believe maha,s read particularly low and it depends on how all the calibrations and adjustments on the dyno are set up.

pretty warm day as well

The main thing you looking at is the gain over stock which is about 25 hp or so this seems very good good for just a tune on a stock car.
normally you would only see 10-15 or so.

What may have happened is the base run was compromised maybe wheel slip or you had been lugging the car round at low rpm in high gears prior to the run. I have seen iam down to 0.4 when people drive that way on 91 fuel and it can result in quite a few lost hp over entire rpm range. A bit of light throttle driving through the rpm range will see the IAM return to closer to 1 and the hp return.

On 91 fuel with stock tune the engine knocks quite a bit especially in low rpm high load, this causes the ecu to take action to reduce the knock and it will reduce a parameter called the Ignition Advance Multiplier or IAM to pull timing reducing knock and also reducing power over the entire rpm range

The tuner does his work and reduces knock in the problem areas and lots of other stuff the IAM now runs at 1 as you tune is optimized for 91 fuel not 93 as the stock tune is. The car will run better smoother and less knock and more power as you have seen.

Last edited by steve99; 08-30-2015 at 10:34 AM.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 08:12 AM   #4
Wyattkb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2014 Whiteout FRS
Location: United States
Posts: 444
Thanks: 56
Thanked 159 Times in 87 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Just taking a shot in the dark, but ambient temps were 105F so that could be a factor. I also live in AZ and when the temps are high the car runs like garbage.
Wyattkb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:22 AM   #5
Freeman
Senior Member
 
Freeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S
Location: Liberty Lake
Posts: 1,209
Thanks: 1,978
Thanked 539 Times in 327 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
I would Try a different dyno before i worry too much. Dynos really vary from one to another.

Who is your tuner?
Freeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 01:12 PM   #6
FRed-S
Member
 
FRed-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Drives: 2015 Scion FR-S
Location: Arizona
Posts: 80
Thanks: 35
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
All dynos read different i believe maha,s read particularly low and it depends on how all the calibrations and adjustments on the dyno are set up.

pretty warm day as well

The main thing you looking at is the gain over stock which is about 25 hp or so this seems very good good for just a tune on a stock car.
normally you would only see 10-15 or so.

What may have happened is the base run was compromised maybe wheel slip or you had been lugging the car round at low rpm in high gears prior to the run. I have seen iam down to 0.4 when people drive that way on 91 fuel and it can result in quite a few lost hp over entire rpm range. A bit of light throttle driving through the rpm range will see the IAM return to closer to 1 and the hp return.

On 91 fuel with stock tune the engine knocks quite a bit especially in low rpm high load, this causes the ecu to take action to reduce the knock and it will reduce a parameter called the Ignition Advance Multiplier or IAM to pull timing reducing knock and also reducing power over the entire rpm range

The tuner does his work and reduces knock in the problem areas and lots of other stuff the IAM now runs at 1 as you tune is optimized for 91 fuel not 93 as the stock tune is. The car will run better smoother and less knock and more power as you have seen.
That is a possibility as it is my daily drive and most days it's only driven around 14 miles round trip to work at mostly up to 45-50 mph. That will change in a few months as I'm moving an the drive will be longer and faster. Do you think the ECU will correct itself as it "learns" the new driving? The car only has around 5,000 miles on the odometer.
FRed-S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 01:56 PM   #7
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,993 Times in 2,983 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRed-S View Post
That is a possibility as it is my daily drive and most days it's only driven around 14 miles round trip to work at mostly up to 45-50 mph. That will change in a few months as I'm moving an the drive will be longer and faster. Do you think the ECU will correct itself as it "learns" the new driving? The car only has around 5,000 miles on the odometer.
The ECU constantly "learns" fuel trims and knock correction.

you can "force it to learn quicker by doing some light steady throttle runs from about 2000 to 6000

see here
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68328



on the stock tune on poor fuels like 91you can get varied results on a dyno depending on how the car was driven just before it went on the dyno.

The stock tune needs about 93 octane to run at max performance. If lesser fuel are used the ecu aggressively retards timing to reduce knock and hence reduces power.

once your tuned for lower quality fuel like 91 things will be much more stable. and the tuner can optimise the tune for 91 so the ecu does not have to intervene constantly to reduce knock.


below is a log of a south African BRZ on 95 ron fuel probably about your 91 or a bit worse. his IAM is 0.2 (should be 1 for full timing advance and max power) the FLKC fine learning knock control is intervening constantly to surpress knock

http://datazap.me/u/steve99/south-af...0&data=2-20-28



below is a log from a tuned car on a much better fuel notice the IAM=1 and no FLKC intervention

http://datazap.me/u/steve99/jamie?lo...zoom=2837-4009
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
aegisdrgn (08-30-2015)
Old 08-30-2015, 02:15 PM   #8
FRed-S
Member
 
FRed-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Drives: 2015 Scion FR-S
Location: Arizona
Posts: 80
Thanks: 35
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thank you Steve99. That sounds very credible. I'd give you one of those official thanks if I knew how lol. New to this forum stuff.
FRed-S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 02:29 PM   #9
why?
Only happy when it rains.
 
why?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: series.blue
Location: Harnett county NC
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 5,698
Thanked 1,265 Times in 750 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRed-S View Post
Thank you Steve99. That sounds very credible. I'd give you one of those official thanks if I knew how lol. New to this forum stuff.
you'll get a thanks button after ten posts. I wondered that too.
why? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 09:49 PM   #10
stevo585
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: White 2014 BRZ
Location: Orlando, FL.
Posts: 519
Thanks: 131
Thanked 155 Times in 109 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quarter mile traps never lie/mislead about power to weight. Do you know yours?
stevo585 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 10:24 PM   #11
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
My 2015 made 155 whp on 91 on dynojet which is pretty low for that dyno. I even did a ecu reset after a few pulls which would put the IAM at .7 and it didn't make any difference.

After putting on a proper header and front pipe and switching to flex fuel and dyno tuned it is now 50-60 whp stronger.
__________________
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2015, 10:54 PM   #12
FRed-S
Member
 
FRed-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Drives: 2015 Scion FR-S
Location: Arizona
Posts: 80
Thanks: 35
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'd love to go E85 but it's so scarce around here and especially where I'm moving to in a few months. I would burn a quarter tank justify for the fuel run.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
__________________
FRed-S
FRed-S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2015, 05:31 AM   #13
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,993 Times in 2,983 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw20kosh View Post
My 2015 made 155 whp on 91 on dynojet which is pretty low for that dyno. I even did a ecu reset after a few pulls which would put the IAM at .7 and it didn't make any difference.

After putting on a proper header and front pipe and switching to flex fuel and dyno tuned it is now 50-60 whp stronger.
On the stock tune IAM initial parameter is set to 0.7, so when you reset the ecu on a stock tune iam will go to 0.7 not 1. After the reset on a stock tune you would need to drive for a period with the ecu seeing little or no knock for the iam to move up to one, light throttle runs 2000-6000 will generally achive this quickly if no\minimal knock detected.

If you on crap fuel the iam may actually go down to 0.5 or less,especially driving in lower rpm range and applying quick throttle applications.

The difference between runs at iam 0.5- 0.7 to 1 could be arround 8hp

Most tuners will set iam initial to 1 in thier tunes so after a reset ecu runs full timing. ie reset the ecu on a tuned car and iam will start at 1 not 0.7 like stock tune

Its a trick\trap that can make tunes look better\worse than they are
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
FRed-S (08-31-2015)
Old 08-31-2015, 06:47 AM   #14
350matt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: toyota mr2/ Toyota GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 438
Thanks: 3
Thanked 140 Times in 92 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'd just set the ecutek up to log and do some 0-60 runs

if the performance of the car is on spec then your power level is fine
350matt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 350matt For This Useful Post:
FRed-S (08-31-2015)
 
Reply

Tags
fr-s & brz


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.