|
|
#85 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Hell it took Ford what 6+ years just to catch up to the Camaro????
LMAO unless Chevy royally screws the pooch I dont think they will have a hard time besting the new Mustang. (you could even debate whether the new Mustang is any better than the current gen Camaro). |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to tennisfreak For This Useful Post: | Dadhawk (04-06-2015) |
|
|
#86 |
|
Boosted Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ Limited
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,979
Thanks: 524
Thanked 945 Times in 497 Posts
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The 2015 Mustang had the wow factor for about 2 weeks, then all the middle eastern exchange students are driving it everywhere now.
__________________
Suzuki Swift GTI '89, Subaru Impreza L '96, Lancer OZ '03, Subaru Impreza WRX '06, Honda CBR600RR Graffiti, Volvo c30 T5 R '11, Subaru BRZ '13, Audi RS4 2007
SUV's: Mercedes Benz R500 '06, Mercedes Benz ML350 '12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
T64-416Ax3=13,140shp
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2002 AP1 and 2015 F-150 EB (DD)
Location: NWA
Posts: 878
Thanks: 783
Thanked 372 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Um, considering the Camaro wasn't even in production when the S197 Mustang platform was released don't you think it should be the other way around? In fact, if it hadn't been for the S197 would GM have even brought back the Camaro? Ask yourself, why did GM quit producing Camaros in the first place? This argument could go in circles all day, but in the end it was Ford and the Mustang. If Ford hadn't developed the original Mustangs back in 1965, would there even be a Camaro today? I know, highly speculative right? I'm not knocking GM or the Camaro, no arguing they can be really fast. The 1LE, ZL1 and Z28s are proof of that. I just think it's funny that so many people make this claim that it's the Mustang always playing catch up to the Camaro when in fact, historically one could make the exact opposite argument. [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Camaro"]Chevrolet Camaro - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame] |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to 53Driver For This Useful Post: | Tcoat (04-06-2015) |
|
|
#88 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Oh you were thinking bigger picture than I was.
I was only referring to the 09 Camaro through today. Since 09 the Mustang has been behind the Camaro and even with the new Mustang its arguable that they have passed the now 6 year old Camaro. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
T64-416Ax3=13,140shp
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2002 AP1 and 2015 F-150 EB (DD)
Location: NWA
Posts: 878
Thanks: 783
Thanked 372 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Define "behind"? Are we talking performance? If so, which models are we comparing? Are we comparing sales #s? Or are we comparing "subjective" preferences and/or ideals? Lots of variables when blanket statements get made. Personally, I'm a car enthusiast so I'm not taking the side of either company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,294 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Many don't seem to understand that the original Mustang was primarily meant to be a cheap, throw away, economy car intended to combat the rising imports (and it worked for a while). The performance versions were pretty scarce at first.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I also felt the interior quality in the pre15 mustang was behind the Camaro. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to tennisfreak For This Useful Post: | 53Driver (04-07-2015) |
|
|
#92 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: '10 SS & '15 FR-S
Location: SoCal
Posts: 80
Thanks: 20
Thanked 44 Times in 30 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to 5thGenOwner For This Useful Post: | funwheeldrive (04-07-2015) |
|
|
#93 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: BANNED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH
Location: MODS ARE ON A POWER TRIP
Posts: 3,447
Thanks: 7,830
Thanked 3,022 Times in 1,409 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 20,086
Thanks: 39,603
Thanked 25,406 Times in 11,585 Posts
Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
I think Firebird > Camaro, at least cosmetically, depends on the generation and of course personal opinion.
Gen 1, Camaro wins. Gen 2, Camaro starts off strong, Firebird takes over at the end. Gen 3, I think it is a tie, although I liked the Camaro better (owned one so biased). Gen 4, Firebird wins not even close. Gen 5, I happen to think the current body looks better as a Firebird. (Here it's channeling Smokey and the Bandit, and stirring those old high school feelings about this car)
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.
Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark. What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk". Last edited by Dadhawk; 04-07-2015 at 10:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 | |
|
T64-416Ax3=13,140shp
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2002 AP1 and 2015 F-150 EB (DD)
Location: NWA
Posts: 878
Thanks: 783
Thanked 372 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 20,086
Thanks: 39,603
Thanked 25,406 Times in 11,585 Posts
Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
I'm pretty sure if the Hurst T/A pictured above had been a factory model, I would not be driving the FR-S today.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.
Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark. What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk". |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post: | 53Driver (04-07-2015) |
|
|
#97 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: Fast
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 790
Thanks: 114
Thanked 408 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
My problem with Firebird was the electrical. Always seemed to be an issue, especially with the motorized headlights. These weren't problems in the Camaro. Looks wise, a '98-'02 Trans-Am WS-6 was a sexy beast.
Here is my old 2002 Camaro SS 35th I used to own on the dyno. This is when I sold it to a guy who detailed the whole thing and replaced the convertible top. Had about 57k miles when I sold it. I loved the F-Body. [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcgoHlS48mQ"]2002 Camaro SS Dyno - YouTube[/ame] |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to 2016 Camaro SS For This Useful Post: | Dadhawk (04-07-2015) |
|
|
#98 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The F-Body seats were about the most uncomfortable seats in car history.
Did not matter what I did within 30 minutes my right side would go numb and this happened to lots of people I knew. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| 2016 camaro ss |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Subaru to Install New Generation of Engine Technology in 2016 | 86geek | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 13 | 03-20-2015 04:49 PM |
| Tubular rear subframe | Manji | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 13 | 09-24-2014 09:23 PM |
| 2016 FR-S vs 2016 MX-5 Coupe | NWFRS | FR-S / BRZ vs.... | 55 | 11-29-2013 12:17 PM |