follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > Regional Forums > CANADA

CANADA Canada

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2012, 11:24 PM   #43
Saibot
Senior Member
 
Saibot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 01 Toyota Corolla / Porsche 911 C2
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 302
Thanks: 11
Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Just thought id add some insight into my test drive with the AUTO FR-S in st catharines today. It was a Silver A/T with Scion stickers all around it. odo had 2.2k on it.

The "scion rep" that brought it was the same guy who was at Kennedy Commons earlier in april. When he saw me, he instantly recoginsied me and said "WHAT are you doing here!?!?!" LOL.

I had a full hour with the auto for myself because the dealership didn't have any other test drives for 1hr15 min. The sales guy guided me to some craazy twisty back country niagara roads, and on the highway (QEW). The only catch was we were not allowed to turn off traction control. I did brake the back wheels lose (for like 2 seconds, even with TC still on) when doing a left turn though.

Paddle shifters were fine. Very natural feeling. Exhaust was OK. Its a bit too quiet for me, and so is the engine noise inside the cabin. Doesnt sound agressive at all when at low RPMs. When you bring it up above 5000, still doesnt sound that great. At idle, it sounds like my 2001 corolla when its in need of an oil change lol ( i guess this is how the boxer is supposed to sound o_O).

I was taking small twisty back country niagara roads with a limit of 10kmph at 50 and 60 with this car. Felt VERY solid, planted and literally no body roll. Not once did i feel like i needed to brake or was going to not make it through the turn or flip or even slide. Balance on this car is great as every other review says. Feels like im riding on rollercoaster tracks when taking really tight corners at high speeds.

amazingly, bumps were not a problem at all! we went over quite afew train tracks and i have no complaints whatsoever.

I do have a slight complaint about throttle response and power for the auto. Accelleration and the "suck you into the seat" factor simply was not there. Maybe because im used to riding in my buddy's M3's. Hopefully the manual feels better in terms of acceleration. (hence why i said feels like im on rollercoaster tracks when taking turns. Acceleration kinda sucks, its more momentum vs power that will push you through corners at high speeds). Throughout the entire test drive, every time i stopped at a stop sign or light, i kept wanting to dump the clutch at 4krpm to feel more power... but then realized it was auto T_T

If the manual ends up with dissapointing acceleration as well, bring on the mods! as it stands now, i feel like it deff needs more power. It is possible though that the stiff suspension is what makes me feel like i want more power. My hunch is with the subaru, since it has softer rear spring rates, the car raises its front more when accelerating, making the passengers feel like they're gaining speed alot faster?

Space in the back: I sat there. It was fine. I have no complaints. But then again; im 5' 7", 135lbs. I could sit there for hours and not complain. not too much of a hassle to get in or out like some other 2+2's.

Cupholders were moveable to accomdate people in the front or people in the back. I see huge potential for an after market armrest that also keeps the cupholders useful.

Windows seem really thin and lightweight; but were ok. Audio was nothing spectacular. Same as what Id expect in any other stock compact car. HVAC knobs were absolute crap though.

Visibility wise I had no problems. Sure i had less visibility than the civic i usually drive, but bleh; I didnt expect to be looking out of a fish tank. There was a huge blindspot as everyone else has mentioned in the rear corners but I just solved that by going 20-30km faster than everyone else when changing lanes LOL.

- Toby
Saibot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 05:16 AM   #44
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ Interesting, thanks Toby. Guess I am lucky I have not been driving any M3s lately lol. When I do my long test drive power is definitely one thing I am going to check out carefully, if it's subjectively not much different from my current ride, which has a 0-60 of 8 - 8.2 sec, I may wait for a more high-powered version. I'll be doing a short drive in an auto FR-S in a few days, and will then drive over to Hyundai for a test of an auto 2013 GC 2.0t for comparison.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:31 AM   #45
pastuch
Senior Member
 
pastuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 478
Thanks: 15
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scion FR-S View Post
^ Interesting, thanks Toby. Guess I am lucky I have not been driving any M3s lately lol. When I do my long test drive power is definitely one thing I am going to check out carefully, if it's subjectively not much different from my current ride, which has a 0-60 of 8 - 8.2 sec, I may wait for a more high-powered version. I'll be doing a short drive in an auto FR-S in a few days, and will then drive over to Hyundai for a test of an auto 2013 GC 2.0t for comparison.
The 2013 GC is a waste of time unless it's an R-Spec. The 2.0T Premium M6 I drove was nice but the R-spec is needed for the sport suspension. The interior on the GC Premium makes the FR-S look totally ghetto. The 2013 GC has a fantastic interior, it's quite impressive.
pastuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:07 AM   #46
7thgear
i'm sorry, what?
 
7thgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,508 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastuch View Post
The 2013 GC is a waste of time unless it's an R-Spec. The 2.0T Premium M6 I drove was nice but the R-spec is needed for the sport suspension. The interior on the GC Premium makes the FR-S look totally ghetto. The 2013 GC has a fantastic interior, it's quite impressive.
obviously you have never been in a ghetto car
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
7thgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:22 AM   #47
pastuch
Senior Member
 
pastuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 478
Thanks: 15
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7thgear View Post
obviously you have never been in a ghetto car
Oh I'll be buying an FR-S despite the interior, not because of it.
pastuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:30 AM   #48
gabeh
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS (to be soon)
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
After sitting in an FRS with the seat at max height I found that the forward visibility just didn't cut it for me (I"m 5-6") and cancelled my order. If anyone is looking for a red base M/T it's coming soon to Yorkdale Toyota. Ask for Eddy.
gabeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:46 AM   #49
7thgear
i'm sorry, what?
 
7thgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,508 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastuch View Post
Oh I'll be buying an FR-S despite the interior, not because of it.
but according to all your posts the Genesis is far superior in all regards.
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
7thgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 12:11 PM   #50
veewonwon
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: G37s, FR-S Firestorm 6MT
Location: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 20
Thanks: 19
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saibot View Post
...
I had a full hour with the auto for myself because the dealership didn't have any other test drives for 1hr15 min.
Envy you've got the extended ride treatment.

Quote:
I do have a slight complaint about throttle response and power for the auto. Accelleration and the "suck you into the seat" factor simply was not there. Maybe because im used to riding in my buddy's M3's.
If you're looking for the muscle car feel, the 6MT will not get you there.

Quote:
My hunch is with the subaru, since it has softer rear spring rates, the car raises its front more when accelerating, making the passengers feel like they're gaining speed alot faster?
No, the suspension trick can't do that magic. You've to get power mod or choose a different car.

Quote:
There was a huge blindspot as everyone else has mentioned in the rear corners but I just solved that by going 20-30km faster than everyone else when changing lanes LOL.
but you still need more power?
veewonwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 02:18 PM   #51
Khyron686
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2011 Outlander XLS, 2013 FR-S Blue
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 634
Thanks: 129
Thanked 168 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saibot View Post
Just thought id add some insight into my test drive with the AUTO FR-S in st catharines today. It was a Silver A/T with Scion stickers all around it. odo had 2.2k on it.

The "scion rep" that brought it was the same guy who was at Kennedy Commons earlier in april. When he saw me, he instantly recoginsied me and said "WHAT are you doing here!?!?!" LOL.

I had a full hour with the auto for myself because the dealership didn't have any other test drives for 1hr15 min. The sales guy guided me to some craazy twisty back country niagara roads, and on the highway (QEW). The only catch was we were not allowed to turn off traction control. I did brake the back wheels lose (for like 2 seconds, even with TC still on) when doing a left turn though.

Paddle shifters were fine. Very natural feeling. Exhaust was OK. Its a bit too quiet for me, and so is the engine noise inside the cabin. Doesnt sound agressive at all when at low RPMs. When you bring it up above 5000, still doesnt sound that great. At idle, it sounds like my 2001 corolla when its in need of an oil change lol ( i guess this is how the boxer is supposed to sound o_O).

I was taking small twisty back country niagara roads with a limit of 10kmph at 50 and 60 with this car. Felt VERY solid, planted and literally no body roll. Not once did i feel like i needed to brake or was going to not make it through the turn or flip or even slide. Balance on this car is great as every other review says. Feels like im riding on rollercoaster tracks when taking really tight corners at high speeds.

amazingly, bumps were not a problem at all! we went over quite afew train tracks and i have no complaints whatsoever.

I do have a slight complaint about throttle response and power for the auto. Accelleration and the "suck you into the seat" factor simply was not there. Maybe because im used to riding in my buddy's M3's. Hopefully the manual feels better in terms of acceleration. (hence why i said feels like im on rollercoaster tracks when taking turns. Acceleration kinda sucks, its more momentum vs power that will push you through corners at high speeds). Throughout the entire test drive, every time i stopped at a stop sign or light, i kept wanting to dump the clutch at 4krpm to feel more power... but then realized it was auto T_T

If the manual ends up with dissapointing acceleration as well, bring on the mods! as it stands now, i feel like it deff needs more power. It is possible though that the stiff suspension is what makes me feel like i want more power. My hunch is with the subaru, since it has softer rear spring rates, the car raises its front more when accelerating, making the passengers feel like they're gaining speed alot faster?

Space in the back: I sat there. It was fine. I have no complaints. But then again; im 5' 7", 135lbs. I could sit there for hours and not complain. not too much of a hassle to get in or out like some other 2+2's.

Cupholders were moveable to accomdate people in the front or people in the back. I see huge potential for an after market armrest that also keeps the cupholders useful.

Windows seem really thin and lightweight; but were ok. Audio was nothing spectacular. Same as what Id expect in any other stock compact car. HVAC knobs were absolute crap though.

Visibility wise I had no problems. Sure i had less visibility than the civic i usually drive, but bleh; I didnt expect to be looking out of a fish tank. There was a huge blindspot as everyone else has mentioned in the rear corners but I just solved that by going 20-30km faster than everyone else when changing lanes LOL.

- Toby
You seem like a torque guy. This is not the right motor. Go try a GTI 2.0T or a BMW 328i - or even a Mustang. I enjoyed the GT, just too big for me.
Khyron686 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 02:54 PM   #52
Dadhawk
Senior Member
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 20,109
Thanks: 39,681
Thanked 25,451 Times in 11,604 Posts
Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saibot View Post
Just thought id add some insight into my test drive with the AUTO FR-S in st catharines today. It was a Silver A/T with Scion stickers all around it. odo had 2.2k on it.
...- Toby
Great, honest insight and input Toby. Thanks!
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 03:22 PM   #53
jimmillion
Power Ranger Elite
 
jimmillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '13 WRB Sport-tech
Location: Mississauga, Sq1
Posts: 726
Thanks: 482
Thanked 310 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks Toby for the review,

An hour in the FRS with all those great rolling roads of the Niagara region?! wow talk about lucky.

I agree, those HVAC knobs were complete garbage - dollar store Tonka wheels are made with higher grade plastic....hopefully there's a aftermarket replacement for them.
__________________
.

jimmillion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 04:21 PM   #54
TheJuggernaut
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 4Gen 4Runner, BMW racecar
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 69
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Just took the silver AT out for an extended drive in Oakville.

Ok the auto sucks, it's horrible. I don't care what any of the reviews say. It's just another slushbox. Yeah it revmatches when you paddle shift and reacts quickly, big deal. During normal driving it's the same garbage as any other underpowered compact with an auto. Always fetching the highest gear it can reach (which possibly explains the fuel economy numbers) and never holding a gear. I also find it kicks down unnecessarily going up grades - the engine is perfectly capable of holding the speed but it kicks down and buzzes up the hill.

Now that I've got that off my chest... I can start off by saying that if there is any issues with my BRZ purchase whatsoever, I now have zero reservations about getting the FRS. The interior materials are very nice, the stereo is fine.

General thoughts:

First glance, I agree with everything that's been said about it's stance. Especially with people inside, it sits perfectly. And the car generally presents itself infinitely better than on pictures (to me, on pictures it looks "neat", in person, it looks pretty badass!)

I'm a 300lb 6' powerlifter, I did not expect to feel happy inside this car. I have a racecar and this is a fun/track car for my wife but she couldn't come during the hours it was available. But to my amazement, the seats really feel quite nice even under my frame. Getting into the car is pretty painless if you mind the doorstep - reminds me of the Corvettes (good thing for me).

I loved how close I could get the steering wheel, I have no idea why steering wheels are so far away on most cars. The upgraded Pioneer headunit has a non-trivial interface and as far as I can tell, doesn't provide much functionality. But oh well, there's no stock headunit that's as good as what the aftermarket offers anyway.

The ride quality is very surprising. I was expecting one of two things - a harsh rattly soupcan like some track prepped Civics, or a RWD Corolla.

After pulling out initially, I feared it was the latter. The road around the dealer is at best crappy, and the ride wasn't jarring in the least. You could feel the bumps but you could feel the suspension was being compliant over all of them, even raised manhole covers.

Then I decided to slowly start squeezing it on. When the salesman noticed it, he casually mentioned how one was crashed during a testdrive recently... I hear ya.

I didn't get a chance to try anything too interesting but at the end I did take the west qew offramp to Bronte at a rather douchey speed. In other street cars, to take this series quickly you have to be smooth on turn in and wait for a hump before the first apex as it will unsettle the car quite a lot. But even without slicks and tooth rattling suspension, it was absolutely unfazed. Then braking for the second half, you can feel the weight transfer but never in a way that will unpredictably make either end feel light.

I think the engine is wonderful, I hesitate to rave about it since it was backed by that horrid transmission. But it has plenty of power and it's actually pretty quick if you let it sing over 6k (the slushbox won't do it on its own). I suspect people disappointed with the power are just not revving it out. It was a common problem with people first getting their TypeRs since the engine sounds like it's going to blow up just when it's starting to make good power. Either that or they're expecting rocketships, in which case it's the wrong car.

One last thing - it's really neat driving this thing on the highway, especially around trucks. It's literally like being in a bee going through a herd of elephants and hippos (cars). Everything is taller than you yet you're quick and stable. I've never ridden a sportbike but it must feel sorta like this. It was also a very windy day and most people were having a hard time staying in the middle of their lane and I could let go of the wheel if I wanted to.

Well done, Toyota/Subaru. I had high but nervous expectations and I was extremely pleased.
TheJuggernaut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheJuggernaut For This Useful Post:
normancw (05-12-2012)
Old 05-10-2012, 06:19 PM   #55
pastuch
Senior Member
 
pastuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 478
Thanks: 15
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7thgear View Post
but according to all your posts the Genesis is far superior in all regards.
I don't know where you get this shit. I'm the most objective driver in the world. Brands mean nothing to me and the Genesis Coupe is an excellent car. I think if you're looking for a GT style car with a nice interior then the 2013 GC is a much better choice than an FR-S. I'm looking for a small, sports car that handles like my NA Miata, so the FR-S is a better fit for me.

My argument has always been for value per dollar and both cars excel. Unlike many people on this forum I don't think the FR-S or BRZ are the only good sports cars on the market. But then, I think brand loyalty is for retarded people that can't read.
pastuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 07:29 PM   #56
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hmmm...after Juggernaut's comments I am not sure if I will even bother test driving the auto, it's a long drive to get there. But then again if the auto is used in manual mode none of his complaints would really apply.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test Drive brzmass12 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 8 04-12-2012 12:16 PM
Test Drive Impressions and MSRP confirmation engee BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 19 04-10-2012 12:37 AM
BRZ test drive invite aloretoc BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 32 03-25-2012 10:13 AM
Car Business test drive Sport-Tech CANADA 14 03-19-2012 02:09 PM
FT-86 Test Drive knoxviue FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 36 11-30-2011 02:43 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.