follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > Regional Forums > CANADA

CANADA Canada

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-05-2012, 06:37 PM   #15
Heero
Senior Member
 
Heero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2-door
Location: Canada
Posts: 258
Thanks: 74
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Alright, I’ll avoid posting any pics with people in them to be safe. If anyone from the test drive wants a specific pic let me know and I’ll provide a link!

First off, Big thanks to Kenny & Scion for setting this up & providing us with the goodies + Test Drive. I recommend anyone who is still looking to order stop Ken Shaw Toyota, Lex & Scion.



Here is Tom, our initial contact @ KS.



The Car looked stellar in W. The stickers were a bit over the top, but meh.





The Dash is nice. I like the fact that they incorporated the speedometer into the tachometer.



Heres the Key if anyone’s interested:



The upgraded head unit is a must IMO. Looks pretty good. It gives the interior a very nice finish and compliments the stitching.



Space in the back was tight for sure. I found however that once you wear seated however the ride was very comfortable. The back seats hug you almost like car seats for babies do.



Here is how much room there is in the back with the front passenger seat pushed all the way up:



Cup holder can be placed in 2 different positions.









The trunk (with seats down) is quite large for a car of this size.





Windows on both sides are auto.



The "handles"/ "levers" or we they are called, are pretty standard Toyota. They look and feel like the ones on my Matrix. Should last.



The only negative to the interior are the controls for the heating and AC. They remind me of the wheels on a cheap Tonka truck. They feel alright and don't look too horrible, so I won't complain. I will however say that the controls were the first thing that drew my eyes though...



Didn't drive the car, but from playing around with the pedals they seemed good. My only complaint was that it was very... vertical. I like to keep my feet angled rather than almost 90 degrees, so it felt weird.



Side cup holders were big



There is soft touch plastic where you would rest your arm during drives.
Heero is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Heero For This Useful Post:
normancw (05-12-2012), YinYang1980 (05-06-2012)
Old 05-05-2012, 06:52 PM   #16
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^Thanks for the images, and I like that photo site, they don't make you jump through 5 different clicks to get to the full uncompressed image. Have to check them out.

Can't say I noticed anything that unusual or awkward about the pedal placement when driving, I will have to pay attention to that on my next test drive.

At first I thought the digital speedo was redundant, but when driving, the analog speedo is hard to read quickly--too many gradations on the face, the dial is small, the usable range limited to the bottom left area, and the gauge is off to one side--so the digital version is a big plus.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 07:19 PM   #17
Heero
Senior Member
 
Heero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2-door
Location: Canada
Posts: 258
Thanks: 74
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scion FR-S View Post
^Thanks for the images, and I like that photo site, they don't make you jump through 5 different clicks to get to the full uncompressed image. Have to check them out.

Can't say I noticed anything that unusual or awkward about the pedal placement when driving, I will have to pay attention to that on my next test drive.

At first I thought the digital speedo was redundant, but when driving, the analog speedo is hard to read quickly--too many gradations on the face, the dial is small, the usable range limited to the bottom left area, and the gauge is off to one side--so the digital version is a big plus.
No worries. Interesting to note that the analog speedo is pretty useless. I figured as much considering the fact that the decided to keep it to the left rather then in the middle.

BTW... looking at this pic makes you realize just how much better the upgraded unit makes the car: http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/j...e/IMG_3847.jpg
Heero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 07:31 PM   #18
Alfie
Senior Member
 
Alfie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: Sheeveek Si
Location: the GTA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Glad to see we get red stitching... rear mud flaps- COOL!
__________________

____"In essence they're identical, and identically excellent." Ollie Marriage TOP GEAR____
Alfie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 07:55 PM   #19
Blue FRS
Stig 2nd Class
 
Blue FRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: Ultramarine FR-S
Location: On a race track
Posts: 55
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks for all the great info and pics. Cant wait for my turn next weekend.
Blue FRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 10:36 PM   #20
Rinker
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: BMW 328i 1999 E46
Location: California Bay Area
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You said there's somewhat of a visibility issue? Would you compare it to as bad as the new Camaros?
Rinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 11:26 PM   #21
csaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: scion tc
Location: NY
Posts: 250
Thanks: 89
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Who would sit in the back anyway....
csaba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 11:31 PM   #22
csaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: scion tc
Location: NY
Posts: 250
Thanks: 89
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I sat in the car I'm 5 10. I think the hood was pretty low compare to my TC .
I had no problem with it
csaba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 12:23 AM   #23
Khyron686
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2011 Outlander XLS, 2013 FR-S Blue
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 634
Thanks: 129
Thanked 168 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinker View Post
You said there's somewhat of a visibility issue? Would you compare it to as bad as the new Camaros?
Dude, NOTHING is as bad as a Camaro. A submarine has better visibility.

If you set your mirrors properly (pointing OUT not at the back of the car) there are virtually no blind spots. But if you are used to shoulder checking beyond 90 degrees to your left/right then yes there's no visibility. The pillar/down slope of the c pillar is huge.

http://www.linquist.net/motorsports/tech/mirrors/

You should only see the side of your car if you smush your face against the glass on the drivers side, and if you lean over and move your head dead center between the driver/pass seat for the pass mirror. It will take you an hour to get used to it.
Khyron686 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 12:36 AM   #24
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ Totally agree on the Camaro. The FR-S is a true greenhouse by comparison. Coming from an older car with greater visibility though the dropoff is noticeable.
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 01:16 AM   #25
tripjammer
Senior Member
 
tripjammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Drives: WRB BRZ limited 6MT
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,765
Thanks: 3,109
Thanked 178 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
This is a sports car. Just adjust your mirrors and you will be fine. Visibility should be better than in a 370z.
tripjammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 01:36 AM   #26
veewonwon
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: G37s, FR-S Firestorm 6MT
Location: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 20
Thanks: 19
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripjammer View Post
This is a sports car. Just adjust your mirrors and you will be fine. Visibility should be better than in a 370z.


Yes, the visibility of FR-S is very good indeed, better than or equal to any RWD sports coupe that I've driven, old and late models. The 370z and G37s (my current DD) are no match in this regard.
veewonwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 01:45 AM   #27
veewonwon
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: G37s, FR-S Firestorm 6MT
Location: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 20
Thanks: 19
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khyron686 View Post
If you set your mirrors properly (pointing OUT not at the back of the car) there are virtually no blind spots. But if you are used to shoulder checking beyond 90 degrees to your left/right then yes there's no visibility. The pillar/down slope of the c pillar is huge.

http://www.linquist.net/motorsports/tech/mirrors/

You should only see the side of your car if you smush your face against the glass on the drivers side, and if you lean over and move your head dead center between the driver/pass seat for the pass mirror. It will take you an hour to get used to it.

This is great info for those who still haven't adjust/use the side mirrors effectively.
veewonwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 02:45 AM   #28
Dr.Science
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Formerly: WRB BRZ LTD
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 64
Thanks: 76
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heero View Post
Interesting to note that the analog speedo is pretty useless. I figured as much considering the fact that the decided to keep it to the left rather then in the middle.
I don't know about other cars, but that's typical of high performance Subaru's. My old WRX had the tach in the center, and so do STI's. The digital speedo is a nice addition, though.
Dr.Science is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test Drive brzmass12 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 8 04-12-2012 12:16 PM
Test Drive Impressions and MSRP confirmation engee BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 19 04-10-2012 12:37 AM
BRZ test drive invite aloretoc BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 32 03-25-2012 10:13 AM
Car Business test drive Sport-Tech CANADA 14 03-19-2012 02:09 PM
FT-86 Test Drive knoxviue FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 36 11-30-2011 02:43 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.