follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-23-2014, 12:53 AM   #15
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
Dude... did you forget to plug in your MAF sensor? Go check it right now 'cause your maf voltage is flatline in that log.

Although in your first log, the MAF looked fine... How does it idle? rough?
I think that was a monitoring glitch as the MAF flow rates are changing, if it was actually flatlining on measured volts yes it would be running like a dog and I suspect the ECU would throw a cel code
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 01:12 AM   #16
ssyed
Senior Member
 
ssyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Frs
Location: Toronto
Posts: 166
Thanks: 77
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
It might be worth just running the tune with the standard maf scale supplied in tune and see what that looks like.

If you were running the 3" maf scale definitly change to the 2.75 version supplied by perrin see end of this post

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64790

If that no good try using the scale that comes with tune.

Did you use the "VGI MAF Scale Utility" to scale MAF (don't use Yikes it will do your head in at first)

No, I was running the 2.75" scale supplied by perrin. Currently I am on the scale that comes with the tune.

I first tried the VGI, but it didnt work, maybe because my maf voltage was flat. Then I tried the Yikes and just gave up. lol. Btw, I am not sure why the MAF sensor was flat line in the previous log, i didnt touch anything, might be a bug.

Also, I just went to my garage right now and did the following:
- Removed the O2 spacer
- Checked exhaust leaks
- Made sure all components of the intake were tight.
- Checked the MAF sensor

Everything looked normal. So did another log just now still showing similar results.

http://www.datazap.me/u/ssyed/205-st...g=0&data=1-6-7

I'm pretty sure now that it has to be the intake. Only if I can figure out how to scale this thing.

In terms of scaling it via VGI, am I going to scale only open loop or close loop? or both. If both, where do I see the new rescaled version?

btw, thanks again for all your help! cant thank you all enough
ssyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 01:53 AM   #17
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssyed View Post
No, I was running the 2.75" scale supplied by perrin. Currently I am on the scale that comes with the tune.

I first tried the VGI, but it didnt work, maybe because my maf voltage was flat. Then I tried the Yikes and just gave up. lol. Btw, I am not sure why the MAF sensor was flat line in the previous log, i didnt touch anything, might be a bug.

Also, I just went to my garage right now and did the following:
- Removed the O2 spacer
- Checked exhaust leaks
- Made sure all components of the intake were tight.
- Checked the MAF sensor

Everything looked normal. So did another log just now still showing similar results.

http://www.datazap.me/u/ssyed/205-st...g=0&data=1-6-7

I'm pretty sure now that it has to be the intake. Only if I can figure out how to scale this thing.

In terms of scaling it via VGI, am I going to scale only open loop or close loop? or both. If both, where do I see the new rescaled version?

btw, thanks again for all your help! cant thank you all enough
to do closed loop scaling. will require some smooth driving steady throttle at low to mid rpm to get good data anout 20 minutes worth.

Then 3 runs WOT 3rd gear 2000 to redline for the open loop. Can all be done in one log and the utility will sort it all out

Log the parameters required, the VGI ulitliy has lots of help in the utility as well.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 01:07 PM   #18
Wepeel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ Ltd
Location: PA
Posts: 458
Thanks: 265
Thanked 230 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssyed View Post
No, I was running the 2.75" scale supplied by perrin. Currently I am on the scale that comes with the tune.

I first tried the VGI, but it didnt work, maybe because my maf voltage was flat. Then I tried the Yikes and just gave up. lol. Btw, I am not sure why the MAF sensor was flat line in the previous log, i didnt touch anything, might be a bug.

Also, I just went to my garage right now and did the following:
- Removed the O2 spacer
- Checked exhaust leaks
- Made sure all components of the intake were tight.
- Checked the MAF sensor

Everything looked normal. So did another log just now still showing similar results.

http://www.datazap.me/u/ssyed/205-st...g=0&data=1-6-7

I'm pretty sure now that it has to be the intake. Only if I can figure out how to scale this thing.

In terms of scaling it via VGI, am I going to scale only open loop or close loop? or both. If both, where do I see the new rescaled version?

btw, thanks again for all your help! cant thank you all enough
So obviously some huge corrections still. I don't think it's the scaling - you went from LTFT's just under -20's to just over -20's. Maybe swap the stock intake back on, run the maps in their default form, and see if you still have large corrections. This would take the intake out of the equation.

(dunno how long swapping intakes takes)
Wepeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 01:17 PM   #19
ssyed
Senior Member
 
ssyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Frs
Location: Toronto
Posts: 166
Thanks: 77
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wepeel View Post
So obviously some huge corrections still. I don't think it's the scaling - you went from LTFT's just under -20's to just over -20's. Maybe swap the stock intake back on, run the maps in their default form, and see if you still have large corrections. This would take the intake out of the equation.



(dunno how long swapping intakes takes)

That's what I was thinking of doing today. Shitty thing is I gotta take off the bumper to remove the intake. I don't mind the time. Just want to figure out what's causing it and to fix it.
ssyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 02:05 PM   #20
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
I think that was a monitoring glitch as the MAF flow rates are changing, if it was actually flatlining on measured volts yes it would be running like a dog and I suspect the ECU would throw a cel code
Yeah you're right. I had the exact same thing happen to me before where the OFT wasn't picking up MAF voltages correctly. If there was an intake leak it should be pretty obvious at idle.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 11:48 PM   #21
ssyed
Senior Member
 
ssyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Frs
Location: Toronto
Posts: 166
Thanks: 77
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wepeel View Post
So obviously some huge corrections still. I don't think it's the scaling - you went from LTFT's just under -20's to just over -20's. Maybe swap the stock intake back on, run the maps in their default form, and see if you still have large corrections. This would take the intake out of the equation.

(dunno how long swapping intakes takes)


So I swapped the stock intake, flashed the 2.05 map (no maf scaling) and logged the car. the LTFT has gone down to -12 on idle. So I am guessing there is still an issue or is this normal?

does this mean i have an exhaust leak somewhere? I know I had issues with installing the nameless downpipe to the headers but it looks like there are no leaks

Any help with this would be appreciated.
ssyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2014, 12:01 AM   #22
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssyed View Post
So I swapped the stock intake, flashed the 2.05 map (no maf scaling) and logged the car. the LTFT has gone down to -12 on idle. So I am guessing there is still an issue or is this normal?

does this mean i have an exhaust leak somewhere? I know I had issues with installing the nameless downpipe to the headers but it looks like there are no leaks

Any help with this would be appreciated.

If its ok everywhere else except idle then its likely just the maf scaling is off a bit, you get a lot of intake air temp variation at idle and it throws the fuel trims off a bit.

exhaust leaks tend to throw the fuel trims positive..
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2014, 12:03 AM   #23
ssyed
Senior Member
 
ssyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Frs
Location: Toronto
Posts: 166
Thanks: 77
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
If its ok everywhere else except idle then its likely just the maf scaling is off a bit, you get a lot of intake air temp variation at idle and it throws the fuel trims off a bit.

exhaust leaks tend to throw the fuel trims positive..
So the scaling could still be off even though I am running stock intake in this log?
ssyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2014, 12:36 AM   #24
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssyed View Post
So the scaling could still be off even though I am running stock intake in this log?
MAF sensors are not perfect and depending on what temps the original scaling were done thy can be out a few degrees. Its not unusual for stock cars to be out 8% in places so add a bit of temp variation and 12% is not out of the question. thats why people go to the trouble of doing their own individual maf scaling

If its only off idle it just might make car a bit hessitant as you start off, it not rearly a huge drama.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2014, 12:47 AM   #25
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Very strange... when I loaded v2.0 on my car with stock intake and drop in filter, the MAF scale was pretty friggin good. LTFT under 3% at idle and low rpms. It's a head scratcher.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2014, 12:50 AM   #26
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
Very strange... when I loaded v2.0 on my car with stock intake and drop in filter, the MAF scale was pretty friggin good. LTFT under 3% at idle and low rpms. It's a head scratcher.
Yep mine is the same 3-4% at idle and only about 1-2% everywhere else pretty well spot on, looks like I won't even need to touch it up
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
ssyed (08-26-2014)
Old 08-24-2014, 04:12 AM   #27
ssyed
Senior Member
 
ssyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Frs
Location: Toronto
Posts: 166
Thanks: 77
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
MAF sensors are not perfect and depending on what temps the original scaling were done thy can be out a few degrees. Its not unusual for stock cars to be out 8% in places so add a bit of temp variation and 12% is not out of the question. thats why people go to the trouble of doing their own individual maf scaling

If its only off idle it just might make car a bit hessitant as you start off, it not rearly a huge drama.


For the VGI scaling tool (close loop) do you know what is dv/dt? How am I supposed to log that?
ssyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2014, 05:43 AM   #28
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssyed View Post
For the VGI scaling tool (close loop) do you know what is dv/dt? How am I supposed to log that?

Don't worry about it it calculates that value just ignore it.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
ssyed (08-26-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i don't understand why anyone would pay extra $$$ over base model for this car stlgrym3 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 126 01-20-2014 11:26 AM
I didn't like the AT and I'm trying to understand why fiveoneoh BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 97 06-11-2013 01:34 PM
I Think I Finally Understand How People Crash 636 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 103 05-27-2013 11:36 PM
Help me understand the BRZ/FRS engine! BRZnut Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 6 12-14-2012 08:39 PM
What I just don't understand... Liquidcell Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 35 08-30-2012 08:38 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.