|
||||||
| Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#30 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: many
Location: here
Posts: 487
Thanks: 190
Thanked 279 Times in 152 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Among other reasons, I believe the H-beam should be stronger than the I-beam which is lighter. Not to say the Manley is weak at all. Carrillo has been producing quality race stuff for a long time and they tend to have immaculate attention to detail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 MT Asphalt FRS
Location: Baldwin Park, CA
Posts: 1,051
Thanks: 237
Thanked 235 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Interested in this and the TB!
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Carlitoz3 For This Useful Post: | MAPerformance (08-15-2014) |
|
|
#32 | |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I believe it is actually the other way around. H beams are lighter, but an inherently weaker design. I beams tend to be heavier, albeit naturally stronger. That said, Carillo's are still very strong H beams, and I don't think anyone currently makes enough power on an FA20 to really even realize the strength limitations on those rods, much less a high quality I beam. Sincerely, Zach Delicious Tuning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Whiteout Scion FR-S
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 508
Thanks: 367
Thanked 209 Times in 129 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
My cars always dress formally. They all wear black tires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think you might have it backwards. I beams are lighter, H beams are heavier.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fszNIRbS8yw[/ame] Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mike the snake For This Useful Post: | Darryljr11 (08-16-2014) |
|
|
#36 | |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
In any case I don't go to Summit for engineering enlightenment ![]() A little bit more data as well: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1902135 Sincerely, Zach Delicious Tuning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I apologize, I simply did a quick query and found that video that stated the opposite of what you had said.
The Summit video did speak generally and seemed informative though. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mike the snake For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#38 |
|
Sideways and Smiling!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Maryland
Posts: 996
Thanks: 442
Thanked 265 Times in 204 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
MAPerformance could maybe give the weight of both rods in their short block offering versus the stock rods?
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Darryljr11 For This Useful Post: | Lawnik (08-16-2014) |
|
|
#39 |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
What is going to be a big improvement in general over stock is the fact that just about any aftermarket rod you get is going to be either forged or billet machined from a forged blank. Not only should this be lighter than stock regardless or H or I beam, it will be much stronger and fatigue resistant.
On a side note, I am noticing a interesting trend among failed motors. Seen 2 at Infamous now that came in blown with really terrible bearing wear. Common link was both a lightweight flywheel and lightweight crank pulley. I was skeptical until I read of yet another one on Facebook today, car was relatively stock except for a lightweight flywheel and crank pulley; motor just gave out. It is a bit interesting. But hey, that's getting off topic. ![]() Sincerely, Zach Delicious Tuning |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post: | andrew5826 (08-16-2014) |
|
|
#40 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ 6MT
Location: Franklin, Tennessee
Posts: 70
Thanks: 9
Thanked 36 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 861 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think as time goes on we'll find the common links to motor failures. It would be a bit odd because the EJ doesn't really have any issues with lightened flywheels and pulleys. It is a different engine though so you never know, if something throws things out of balance a little bit. Could even be flywheels not being completely balanced correctly.
Anyways, always good to see more component options for the engines. I would also agree any aftermarket rod is going to be way better than stock and likely beefy enough people would never break them on this engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: FA20 Short Block or Blown Long Block | The Racers Line | Want-To-Buy Requests | 1 | 06-29-2014 06:21 PM |
| Fa20 with Fb25 block. | jet86 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 49 | 04-23-2014 07:21 PM |
| FA20 oem Short Block 3k miles | Area51 | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 29 | 09-13-2013 02:01 AM |
| WTB: short block or long block | DOTman05 | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 2 | 07-14-2013 07:48 AM |