follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-2014, 03:20 AM   #29
Darryljr11
Sideways and Smiling!
 
Darryljr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Maryland
Posts: 996
Thanks: 442
Thanked 265 Times in 204 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Garage
What would be the reason for one to choose the Carrillo rods over the Manley rods?
Darryljr11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2014, 03:43 AM   #30
abraxis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: many
Location: here
Posts: 487
Thanks: 190
Thanked 279 Times in 152 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryljr11 View Post
What would be the reason for one to choose the Carrillo rods over the Manley rods?
Among other reasons, I believe the H-beam should be stronger than the I-beam which is lighter. Not to say the Manley is weak at all. Carrillo has been producing quality race stuff for a long time and they tend to have immaculate attention to detail.
abraxis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2014, 04:22 AM   #31
Carlitoz3
Senior Member
 
Carlitoz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 MT Asphalt FRS
Location: Baldwin Park, CA
Posts: 1,051
Thanks: 237
Thanked 235 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Interested in this and the TB!
Carlitoz3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Carlitoz3 For This Useful Post:
MAPerformance (08-15-2014)
Old 08-16-2014, 01:22 PM   #32
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxis View Post
Among other reasons, I believe the H-beam should be stronger than the I-beam which is lighter. Not to say the Manley is weak at all. Carrillo has been producing quality race stuff for a long time and they tend to have immaculate attention to detail.


I believe it is actually the other way around. H beams are lighter, but an inherently weaker design. I beams tend to be heavier, albeit naturally stronger. That said, Carillo's are still very strong H beams, and I don't think anyone currently makes enough power on an FA20 to really even realize the strength limitations on those rods, much less a high quality I beam.


Sincerely,


Zach
Delicious Tuning
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2014, 05:06 PM   #33
Black Tire
Senior Member
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Whiteout Scion FR-S
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 508
Thanks: 367
Thanked 209 Times in 129 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gramicci101 View Post
Will you be coming out with upgraded head/valvespring packages to match the awesome new short block?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAPerformance View Post
Yes sir! That is absolutely in the works.
A long while back, Ferrea stated that they would be making a valve set and maybe a cam set for the FA20. Do you plan to consider these as choices for a build?
__________________
My cars always dress formally. They all wear black tires.

Black Tire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2014, 06:46 PM   #34
mike the snake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think you might have it backwards. I beams are lighter, H beams are heavier.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fszNIRbS8yw[/ame]


Quote:
Originally Posted by sales@delicioustuning.com View Post
I believe it is actually the other way around. H beams are lighter, but an inherently weaker design. I beams tend to be heavier, albeit naturally stronger. That said, Carillo's are still very strong H beams, and I don't think anyone currently makes enough power on an FA20 to really even realize the strength limitations on those rods, much less a high quality I beam.


Sincerely,


Zach
Delicious Tuning
mike the snake is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mike the snake For This Useful Post:
Darryljr11 (08-16-2014)
Old 08-16-2014, 07:04 PM   #35
Darryljr11
Sideways and Smiling!
 
Darryljr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Maryland
Posts: 996
Thanks: 442
Thanked 265 Times in 204 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Garage
was about to post that
Darryljr11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2014, 07:12 PM   #36
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike the snake View Post
I think you might have it backwards. I beams are lighter, H beams are heavier.

That would be true if both rods had the same thickness, material etc. However, the H beams I've seen have had much thinner walls, and were a lot lighter. If manufacturers of H beams made them to the same thickness as the standard I beam offerings then yes, they'd be both heavier and stiffer, but they generally do not. I have yet to see an H beam offering for a Subaru that is heavier than a comparable I beam offering :P


In any case I don't go to Summit for engineering enlightenment

A little bit more data as well: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1902135

Sincerely,

Zach
Delicious Tuning
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2014, 09:19 PM   #37
mike the snake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I apologize, I simply did a quick query and found that video that stated the opposite of what you had said.

The Summit video did speak generally and seemed informative though.


Quote:
Originally Posted by sales@delicioustuning.com View Post
That would be true if both rods had the same thickness, material etc. However, the H beams I've seen have had much thinner walls, and were a lot lighter. If manufacturers of H beams made them to the same thickness as the standard I beam offerings then yes, they'd be both heavier and stiffer, but they generally do not. I have yet to see an H beam offering for a Subaru that is heavier than a comparable I beam offering :P


In any case I don't go to Summit for engineering enlightenment

A little bit more data as well: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1902135

Sincerely,

Zach
Delicious Tuning
mike the snake is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mike the snake For This Useful Post:
Old 08-16-2014, 09:23 PM   #38
Darryljr11
Sideways and Smiling!
 
Darryljr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Maryland
Posts: 996
Thanks: 442
Thanked 265 Times in 204 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Garage
MAPerformance could maybe give the weight of both rods in their short block offering versus the stock rods?
Darryljr11 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Darryljr11 For This Useful Post:
Lawnik (08-16-2014)
Old 08-16-2014, 09:56 PM   #39
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
What is going to be a big improvement in general over stock is the fact that just about any aftermarket rod you get is going to be either forged or billet machined from a forged blank. Not only should this be lighter than stock regardless or H or I beam, it will be much stronger and fatigue resistant.

On a side note, I am noticing a interesting trend among failed motors. Seen 2 at Infamous now that came in blown with really terrible bearing wear. Common link was both a lightweight flywheel and lightweight crank pulley. I was skeptical until I read of yet another one on Facebook today, car was relatively stock except for a lightweight flywheel and crank pulley; motor just gave out. It is a bit interesting.

But hey, that's getting off topic.

Sincerely,

Zach
Delicious Tuning
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post:
andrew5826 (08-16-2014)
Old 08-16-2014, 10:27 PM   #40
Killianti
Member
 
Killianti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ 6MT
Location: Franklin, Tennessee
Posts: 70
Thanks: 9
Thanked 36 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sales@delicioustuning.com View Post
What is going to be a big improvement in general over stock is the fact that just about any aftermarket rod you get is going to be either forged or billet machined from a forged blank. Not only should this be lighter than stock regardless or H or I beam, it will be much stronger and fatigue resistant.

On a side note, I am noticing a interesting trend among failed motors. Seen 2 at Infamous now that came in blown with really terrible bearing wear. Common link was both a lightweight flywheel and lightweight crank pulley. I was skeptical until I read of yet another one on Facebook today, car was relatively stock except for a lightweight flywheel and crank pulley; motor just gave out. It is a bit interesting.

But hey, that's getting off topic.

Sincerely,

Zach
Delicious Tuning
The engines most likely to give out are the ones owned by enthusiests.
Killianti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2014, 11:49 AM   #41
xwd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 861 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think as time goes on we'll find the common links to motor failures. It would be a bit odd because the EJ doesn't really have any issues with lightened flywheels and pulleys. It is a different engine though so you never know, if something throws things out of balance a little bit. Could even be flywheels not being completely balanced correctly.

Anyways, always good to see more component options for the engines. I would also agree any aftermarket rod is going to be way better than stock and likely beefy enough people would never break them on this engine.
xwd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2014, 07:51 PM   #42
Darryljr11
Sideways and Smiling!
 
Darryljr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Maryland
Posts: 996
Thanks: 442
Thanked 265 Times in 204 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Garage
Then I beam it is!!!
Darryljr11 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: FA20 Short Block or Blown Long Block The Racers Line Want-To-Buy Requests 1 06-29-2014 06:21 PM
Fa20 with Fb25 block. jet86 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 49 04-23-2014 07:21 PM
FA20 oem Short Block 3k miles Area51 Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 29 09-13-2013 02:01 AM
WTB: short block or long block DOTman05 Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 2 07-14-2013 07:48 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.