follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2014, 09:49 AM   #57
xwd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 861 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Perhaps you're not understanding my post.

If you put an identical turbo pushing an identical mass of air, at an identical psi, on two different engines, you should be getting a similar horsepower, right? If the mass of air going into the engine is the same, then you need a proportional amount of fuel to combust (otherwise you will be too rich/lean), which should result in similar horsepower.
No, that isn't how it works, it isn't an identical mass of air.

An engine is an air pump, even though your pressure might be similar they are not moving the air the same.
xwd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to xwd For This Useful Post:
gmsii (05-19-2014)
Old 05-18-2014, 11:33 AM   #58
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,214 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwx View Post
No, that isn't how it works, it isn't an identical mass of air.

An engine is an air pump, even though your pressure might be similar they are not moving the air the same.
That is precisely my point.

The FA20 is the limitation.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 11:37 AM   #59
TmP
Senior Member
 
TmP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: A bunch of 'em...
Location: MX
Posts: 270
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
So the engine sucks output wise, that's pretty obvious.
I mean it makes less torque than the starter motor on a SBC. lol

What about durability though?
What's a SAFE power level for the stock moturd?
Anyone making cams for these things?
Looks and sounds like the stock ones aren't exactly aggressive...
TmP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 11:45 AM   #60
xwd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 861 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
That is precisely my point.

The FA20 is the limitation.
That's like saying a F22C is the limitation because it doesn't make 500RWHP like a LS7. The amount of air the supercharger is pushing isn't the same between the two motors. You just can't compare the same blower/turbo on two different motors, it's silly. The F22C makes 40HP more than a FA20 without the supercharger, adding a supercharger doesn't even that out...
xwd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to xwd For This Useful Post:
gmsii (05-19-2014)
Old 05-18-2014, 12:07 PM   #61
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,214 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwx View Post
That's like saying a F22C is the limitation because it doesn't make 500RWHP like a LS7. The amount of air the supercharger is pushing isn't the same between the two motors. You just can't compare the same blower/turbo on two different motors, it's silly. The F22C makes 40HP more than a FA20 without the supercharger, adding a supercharger doesn't even that out...
Comparing a 7.0L LS7 to a 2.15L F22C is silly. Comparing a 2.15L F22C to a 2.0L FA20 is not.

Both are 4 cylinders, relatively high revving, high compression, naturally aspirated engines. Both are relatively small bore, small stroke engines.

Three, yes three, LS7 cylinders, displace more than both the F22C and FA20.

The difference is 40hp (20%) when naturally aspirated. That difference jumps to 120hp when boosted with a Rotrex at ~9psi (~90k rpm), which is 43%.

If the Supercharger is being spun the same way, but is flowing less on one engine than the other... the engine is that variable..
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 12:28 PM   #62
TmP
Senior Member
 
TmP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: A bunch of 'em...
Location: MX
Posts: 270
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Well, you can't compare a real engine like an LS7 with the toy motors in either the S2k or the 86. lol
TmP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 04:48 PM   #63
TmP
Senior Member
 
TmP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: A bunch of 'em...
Location: MX
Posts: 270
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
KW kit ordered.
I like the idea of the separate belt drive for reliability.
Don't want to end up stuck in the middle of nowhere in the Mexican mountains with a car that can't drive...
Also, I like the future upgradability to the C38 headunit and higher boost pulleys.
Currently I don't have access to e85, but I will in the future... so it makes sense to plan ahead.
TmP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 06:24 PM   #64
gmsii
 
gmsii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: southern california
Posts: 201
Thanks: 14
Thanked 156 Times in 81 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
That is precisely my point.

The FA20 is the limitation.
i can't figure out what your point is other than pointing out the base s2000 engine is more efficient than the fa20

give the same air mass blown out from the compressor, the f22 honda engine will have lower boost (primarily due to better intake port flow and also larger cams) than the fa20

the FA20 is what it is....what bearing does the F22's performance have on the supercharger selection of the FA20?

for the record, KW has plenty of cars running just fine on either the C30-94 with the highboost pulley and the C38
gmsii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 07:17 PM   #65
tahdizzle
So elite I'm 1338
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: WRB Subaru BRZ
Location: California
Posts: 3,008
Thanks: 1,835
Thanked 1,934 Times in 982 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Comparing a 7.0L LS7 to a 2.15L F22C is silly. Comparing a 2.15L F22C to a 2.0L FA20 is not.

Both are 4 cylinders, relatively high revving, high compression, naturally aspirated engines. Both are relatively small bore, small stroke engines.

Three, yes three, LS7 cylinders, displace more than both the F22C and FA20.

The difference is 40hp (20%) when naturally aspirated. That difference jumps to 120hp when boosted with a Rotrex at ~9psi (~90k rpm), which is 43%.

If the Supercharger is being spun the same way, but is flowing less on one engine than the other... the engine is that variable..
I'm sorry but this is such a biased opinion. LOL

2157 cc engine if you really want to get technical vs. 1998 cc engine.

There is no replacement for displacement. The f22 has about 8% larger displacement and you can't calculate 8% more displacement as a straight calculation.

You might as well be comparing an LS7 to any 4cyl, because its asinine to say "that engine is weak because this bigger engine with the same boost level makes more power". Which is, in a nutshell, your comparison of the two.
tahdizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tahdizzle For This Useful Post:
misooscar (05-27-2014)
Old 05-19-2014, 07:20 PM   #66
TmP
Senior Member
 
TmP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: A bunch of 'em...
Location: MX
Posts: 270
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Yeah, but the advantage is not proportional to the increase in displacement...
Ergo - Honda makes a "better" motor than Subaru.

Shocker.
TmP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 07:25 PM   #67
tahdizzle
So elite I'm 1338
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: WRB Subaru BRZ
Location: California
Posts: 3,008
Thanks: 1,835
Thanked 1,934 Times in 982 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by TmP View Post
Yeah, but the advantage is not proportional to the increase in displacement...
Ergo - Honda makes a "better" motor than Subaru.

Shocker.
Not sure what you are trying to say when you say "The advantage is not proportional..." because thats what I meant. I.E. 10% more displacement =/= 10% more power.


Probably the most impressive econobox engine i know of is the b18c honda engine.

That was just an impressive engine
tahdizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 07:28 PM   #68
TmP
Senior Member
 
TmP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: A bunch of 'em...
Location: MX
Posts: 270
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
In what universe is 270 vs 405 an 8 percent advantage again?
lol

Best econobox engine has to be the SRT4's 2.4 Turbo.
But I'm biased of course. haha
TmP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 07:30 PM   #69
tahdizzle
So elite I'm 1338
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: WRB Subaru BRZ
Location: California
Posts: 3,008
Thanks: 1,835
Thanked 1,934 Times in 982 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by TmP View Post
In what universe is 270 vs 405 an 8 percent advantage again?
lol

Best econobox engine has to be the SRT4's 2.4 Turbo.
But I'm biased of course. haha


... are you funnin me?


2157 = 108% of 1998.
tahdizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2014, 07:46 PM   #70
CSG David
 
CSG David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: California
Posts: 2,109
Thanks: 537
Thanked 1,723 Times in 956 Posts
Mentioned: 173 Post(s)
Well this kind of got off topic quickly.

Church Automotive's S2000 has a factory F20C (1997cc) with a C30-94 blower running around 15psi of boost and ~560-600hp with E85. All he did was change the pulley out and tune it. You can find this car in the Import Tuner 2013 FR Shootout.

Either way, congratulations on your purchase @TmP. You will enjoy the generic FI lifestyle. Did you go straight to the C38-81 option?
CSG David is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DPS Kraftwerks Scion FRS - KW / Invidia / Kraftwerks / Enkei rickspecd Member's Car Journals 40 06-26-2014 12:42 PM
Blower fan squeal 2point0 Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 4 04-01-2014 07:40 PM
Vortech blower a bit of noise? Sniper2606 Forced Induction 25 07-17-2013 07:11 PM
who wants to see inside of a vortech blower :) charged86 Forced Induction 20 04-14-2013 07:46 PM
Turbo Whistle v. Blower Whine SupraLove Forced Induction 34 11-21-2012 08:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.