follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2012, 01:32 PM   #15
powertrip
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: Mercedes C320, S2000
Location: North Florida
Posts: 155
Thanks: 3
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double4Free View Post
I doubt itll be 280 hp :| even if they do come out with it itll be like 250 hp max. And thats in like 2 - 3 years. Not waiting for that :[
It's not the numbers im searching for, its the engine from the factory with FI in mind. Even if it just had 240 I'll take a factory boosted motor over having to deal with NA to FI conversions. It's a lot more fun (IMO) modding a car that came with FI, than tuning NA cars in my experience. And generally that first extra bit of HP comes a lot cheaper than they do in NA as well.

It's not the paper numbers I want out of this car. Its the opportunity for it to grow later on into a nice solid platform I want to keep. Unfortunately I end up getting bored with my cars after a few years and love to tinker a bit and kick them up a notch in the performance category in the garage.
powertrip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 01:36 PM   #16
Subaruwrxfan
Senior Member
 
Subaruwrxfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2015 Mustang EcoBoost
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 796
Thanks: 274
Thanked 195 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Interesting that the lead engineer specified that the front tires have to stay 215 but that the rears can fit up to 235...
Also, the way he was talking about 280hp was before they even started talking about the turbo. There's gotta be a bunch of potential in this motor N/A. Hoping the aftermarket figures it out sooner rather than later. I'm fine with 200, but I would certainly welcome 250-280 as well.
__________________
Check out my BRZ videos on my YouTube page: youtube.com/subaruwrxfan
Subaruwrxfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 01:48 PM   #17
86'd
Senior Member
 
86'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2012 WRX Sedan
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 511
Thanks: 25
Thanked 97 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
This has been said but:

It sounds like they'll just put the next WRX engine in it.

And I'm sure it'll be way into the $30's when it does come out. They'll have to put wider wheels, stickier rubber, bigger brakes, at the very least. A Limited BRZ with 280hp could easily be $35k+.

Again, I don't need to have more power, but it's nice to know that Subaru is thinking about it and that the FA platform is there and compatible with the other models. Though I'm sure the new WRX engine is going to be strengthened compared to the BRZ's engine.

But I don't want to get caught up in that. N/A is what I'd prefer and this is just another review that suggests that the BRZ does what it's supposed to do.
86'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 01:54 PM   #18
ashtray
As Seen On The Internet
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2003 WRX, 2013 BRZ, 442
Location: SoCal
Posts: 852
Thanks: 23
Thanked 251 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
There was talk last year that the Subaru version would have "less than 300hp", and Toyota's would have about 200hp. The numbers themselves aren't as telling as the suggestion that they would be different. It's very possible that a 280hp Subaru version has already been worked out, but maybe they felt to hold that back a bit - or that if the Subaru was so much more powerful than the Toyota, it would kill Toyota's sales.

I'm sure there were price point discussions as well, and maybe Toyota is thinking to go in a different direction than Subaru for more power and they decided to just both start with identical cars, then develop them on their own moving forwards. Maybe Subaru will increase redline and/or displacement while Toyota will add FI.

Very interesting to hear the 280hp figure thrown out and to look back to the "less than 300hp" quoted last year. Really sounds to me they're holding back, and a hotter version is on the way. (18" wheels, upgraded/lowered suspension, more hp, mechanical diff, etc). That said - if the Limited costs $28k now, any performance pkg would push that well over $30k. Everyone is crying for turbo, etc - but who's willing to pay for it?
ashtray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 01:57 PM   #19
Khyron686
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2011 Outlander XLS, 2013 FR-S Blue
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 634
Thanks: 129
Thanked 168 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subaruwrxfan View Post
Interesting that the lead engineer specified that the front tires have to stay 215 but that the rears can fit up to 235...
Also, the way he was talking about 280hp was before they even started talking about the turbo. There's gotta be a bunch of potential in this motor N/A. Hoping the aftermarket figures it out sooner rather than later. I'm fine with 200, but I would certainly welcome 250-280 as well.
I found this REALLY interesting, as I thought the 215s were more for squeezing a bit more mpg for the EPA test and that 225 would be the more realistic setup.

The Mustang ran into the same problem where the fronts needed to be quite skinny (relative) to maintain decent steering feel. Definitely don't want to screw that up.
Khyron686 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 01:57 PM   #20
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashtray View Post
Very interesting to hear the 280hp figure thrown out and to look back to the "less than 300hp" quoted last year. Really sounds to me they're holding back, and a hotter version is on the way. (18" wheels, upgraded/lowered suspension, more hp, mechanical diff, etc). That said - if the Limited costs $28k now, any performance pkg would push that well over $30k. Everyone is crying for turbo, etc - but who's willing to pay for it?

Could offer the performance pkg on top of the premium version and drop the heated seats, fog lights, ACC, spoiler, leather seats...etc. If the Premium starts at $25k, I wonder if they could do a performance package for ~+$7k? The current WRX has a $7k premium over a similarly spec'd Impreza Premium. Subtract out the $1500-2000 for the premium to limited upgrade and I think you could potentially get one around $30k? Or is that too much mental masturbation?
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:01 PM   #21
tachi1247
Senior Member
 
tachi1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: 04 BMW 330i & 03 Mazdaspeed Protege
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 403
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashtray View Post
There was talk last year that the Subaru version would have "less than 300hp", and Toyota's would have about 200hp. The numbers themselves aren't as telling as the suggestion that they would be different. It's very possible that a 280hp Subaru version has already been worked out, but maybe they felt to hold that back a bit - or that if the Subaru was so much more powerful than the Toyota, it would kill Toyota's sales.

I'm sure there were price point discussions as well, and maybe Toyota is thinking to go in a different direction than Subaru for more power and they decided to just both start with identical cars, then develop them on their own moving forwards. Maybe Subaru will increase redline and/or displacement while Toyota will add FI.

Very interesting to hear the 280hp figure thrown out and to look back to the "less than 300hp" quoted last year. Really sounds to me they're holding back, and a hotter version is on the way. (18" wheels, upgraded/lowered suspension, more hp, mechanical diff, etc). That said - if the Limited costs $28k now, any performance pkg would push that well over $30k. Everyone is crying for turbo, etc - but who's willing to pay for it?
I would definitely be willing to pay for it. I'm looking for a 370Z competitor with 4 seats so this would be perfect.

lots of signs point to a turbo version eventually....hopefully it comes out with the next model year and they don't make us wait for a refresh.
tachi1247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:06 PM   #22
Turbowned
Senior Member
 
Turbowned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ Perf Pack 6MT
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 5,048
Thanks: 1,949
Thanked 1,945 Times in 1,150 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
It's like beating a dead horse:

__________________

Current: 2005 Porsche 911 Carrera S 6MT
Previous: 2 BRZ's, 997 C2S, C5 RS6, C4 S6, B8 S4, GDB STi, S30 240Z, FC3S RX-7 TII, AW11/SW20 MR2, E30 318is/325i, etc.
Turbowned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:07 PM   #23
poormans_LFA
FT86Club.com O.G.
 
poormans_LFA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Gunmetal Gundam Wing Zero Custom
Location: socal
Posts: 1,455
Thanks: 244
Thanked 221 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbowned View Post
It's like beating a dead horse:



inevitable truth for humans: enough is never enough. i'm just glad the car is here. turbo no turbo.
__________________
poormans_LFA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:13 PM   #24
JohnnyR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 04 Evo 8
Location: PA
Posts: 171
Thanks: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subaruwrxfan View Post
Interesting that the lead engineer specified that the front tires have to stay 215 but that the rears can fit up to 235...
Also, the way he was talking about 280hp was before they even started talking about the turbo. There's gotta be a bunch of potential in this motor N/A. Hoping the aftermarket figures it out sooner rather than later. I'm fine with 200, but I would certainly welcome 250-280 as well.
Doubt it. It was a tie in. I highly doubt that there will be a 280hp NA motor for this car as it's already pushing the limits of CR, and for the power to get up that high it would have to become even higher revving, with a far narrower powerband, and it's DD capability will have gone to squat.

That 280hp figure is a direct guesstimate what the new WRX would clock in at using this motor in Turbo form.

Subaru took it to heart when people dogged them on power. That's great and all with it's handling, it's much appreciated, but it lacks power to be competitive with other cars on the tracks/courses, and I'm sure the "shootouts" will show this easily.

People here bought the "fun to drive, who needs power" marketing Toybaru put out there. They'll sell every car they can make, some to the fanboys, some to those in the know who want a non-boring daily beater with good MPG, while many will go to the window shoppers based on looks alone.

I'm sure this car was planned from Subaru to be FI from the get go actually, and that they made a gentleman's agreement with Toyota not to do a proper STI at launch.
JohnnyR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:17 PM   #25
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyR View Post
Doubt it. It was a tie in. I highly doubt that there will be a 280hp NA motor for this car as it's already pushing the limits of CR, and for the power to get up that high it would have to become even higher revving, with a far narrower powerband, and it's DD capability will have gone to squat.

That 280hp figure is a direct guesstimate what the new WRX would clock in at using this motor in Turbo form.

Subaru took it to heart when people dogged them on power. That's great and all with it's handling, it's much appreciated, but it lacks power to be competitive with other cars on the tracks/courses, and I'm sure the "shootouts" will show this easily.

People here bought the "fun to drive, who needs power" marketing Toybaru put out there. They'll sell every car they can make, some to the fanboys, some to those in the know who want a non-boring daily beater with good MPG, while many will go to the window shoppers based on looks alone.

I'm sure this car was planned from Subaru to be FI from the get go actually, and that they made a gentleman's agreement with Toyota not to do a proper STI at launch.
Wasn't this the issue. Tada/Toyoda disagreed with AWD and turbo. Wanted to go back to the basics. I.e. RWD and NA. As a result what we have is what we have. SOA has always said no turbo at launch.
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:30 PM   #26
Spaceywilly
ZC6A2B82KC7J
 
Spaceywilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2002 WRX
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 361
Thanked 727 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I don't understand why every review of the car so far has been overwhelmingly positive, and yet people choose to dwell on the power and tires, which every reviewer has said is adequate. You would think the reviews so far had trashed on the car, when so far there has not been a single negative review. I guess people missed this part:

Quote:
Long story short – and to all doubters who have only numbers on paper or computer to go by – the Subaru BRZ is one hell of a real sports car and, on roads like these, will beat the tar out of all legitimate comers selling for anywhere near the Subie's estimated $25,500, and many selling on up to $45,000. I was actually spotted shaking my head in disbelief while talking one-on-one with the BRZ's senior project manager, Toshio Masuda, following the drive. I felt as though I'd just driven a Porsche Cayman at less than half the price.
Shut up about the turbo already.
__________________

Straights are for fast cars. Turns are for fast drivers.
Spaceywilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:33 PM   #27
brillo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S
Location: Houston
Posts: 506
Thanks: 18
Thanked 77 Times in 64 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
so the stock rims can only handle 215 in the front? I have a hard time believing that 225/45/17s wouldn't also fit. Has anyone else commented on this in a review?
brillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:34 PM   #28
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceywilly View Post
I don't understand why every review of the car so far has been overwhelmingly positive, and yet people choose to dwell on the power and tires, which every reviewer has said is adequate. You would think the reviews so far had trashed on the car, when so far there has not been a single negative review. I guess people missed this part:

Shut up about the turbo already.
I don't get it either. I want wider, stickier tires for competition use. I have zero interest in a turbo version of the car. The worst thing Subaru could do IMO is make the STI a turbo car instead of a lighter NA car with a slight bump in power, suspension and brakes. It would also cost STI money which I doubt I'm willing to pay for a BRZ anyways.

Then again I want the car for exactly what it is, not because of some numbers printed on a sheet of paper.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Autoblog Scion FRS Review CptCaveman Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 35 11-09-2012 04:37 PM
2013 Subaru BRZ and 2013 Scion FR-S: A Study in Comparison and Contrast Zgrinch Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 124 02-21-2012 02:43 AM
Autoblog BRZ First Drive review Kids Heart BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 11 12-05-2011 10:00 PM
Road & Track Test Drive Review of 2013 Subaru BRZ Hachiroku BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 39 12-05-2011 09:45 AM
Motor Trend First Drive Review: 2013 Subaru BRZ Quantum BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 41 12-05-2011 09:08 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.