Any of you convert from a WRX?

[Boxer486]

Originally Posted by regal

You're right I don't see where your coming from.

Yeah I don't see why you need me to have a conversation with yourself.

I'm not psychic like you so I can only go off what you actually write and look at actual automotive history as a guide. Obviously no one can debate your powers of premonition and magic crystals.
_______

Oh that's right, you're the genius that said Tada needed to be fired for making the 86 aren't you? All makes sense now. I'm rather glad your powers don't extend beyond your cubicle.

[tahdizzle]

Probably a naturarally aspirated flat 6 with 4 electric engines at each corner.

[Jaylyons1]

Originally Posted by SirBrass

Torque dip is entirely fixable with tune and headers. It's not an engine design issue, just a header and tune issue.

I loved how the dip evened out when I picked up my rev works headers. Dramatic difference.

[SirBrass]

Originally Posted by regal

No company is perfect, GM certainly isn't an neither is Lotus. I agree a balanced approach is best but these days the bean counters have taken over whether we like it or not. The WRX with the 2L FA20T is the perfect example of how well a small displacement low displacement 4 cylinder can have great performance.


But I guess that is just trolling to you, I think its hard proof that this is the future for budget performance and good engineering takes cost in account. As far as the STI, I did mean WRX the subject of the thread, but what do you think will be in the EJ25's place when that engine is no longer produced? You're right I don't see where your coming from.

^ ^

Dear lord.... the drama!! Make it stop!