|
|
#603 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ Ltd
Location: PA
Posts: 458
Thanks: 265
Thanked 230 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
|
I've heard that the Z2 wasn't great as a 245 on the 9" rim - possibly it being too stiff (they seem to be very good squeezed, like a 235 on a 7" in CStreet). I know the Rival didn't work great at Nationals but it seemed to work well locally and for tours. I'm thinking I might give the Rivals a go in 245 or 255. I liked them on my STU STI and in the few events I did on the BRZ in RTR (225).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#604 |
|
Dodging cones
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited, 93 Z28
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 264
Thanked 278 Times in 176 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
|
Z2s are the choice right now IMO, with RS3s not available. I'm loving mine, just having to spray the piss out of them every run after 3rd
Edit: didn't realize I was in the STX thread, was thinking CS. Still believe RS3 is the best answer for STX. With camber, those rule in 245. Z2s are better when you can't camber and I can't
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#605 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: -'02 PSM WRX, '94 Miata, '13 BRZ
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 438
Thanks: 188
Thanked 155 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
|
Quote:
R1R is only good for this year, but this in the year that matters right now. ![]() I am between R1R and Rival, then its 255/245 and if I go with the R1R the 245 has 3 different sidewalls.
__________________
![]() Sponsered by:Chasebays/Corr Performance Tuning/KartBoy/Bad Panda Motorsports/Racer-X Fabrication STX Build thread 14th/67 SCCA Nationals (2014) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#606 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2014 BRZ
Location: Maryland
Posts: 89
Thanks: 1
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
I'm betting the new RS3 will be available in time to be legal for the year. Barring that, the ZII or Rival. Toyos for Nationals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#607 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Asphalt
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 36
Thanks: 66
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Hey guys thanks for all the good input. I Just ran my rivials for the second time this weekend . They grip great and i feel they reach max grip faster than RS-3 which is good for me since in normally a one driver car. When i got home when i was storing them away i noticed about of unused tread on the inside. Im only running 1 degrees in the front and about 2 in the back. Question : should i be running more camber ?? Im kinda of intimidated to mess with my camber plates after alignment .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#608 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Whiteout FRS- autocross ready
Location: Montana
Posts: 283
Thanks: 136
Thanked 109 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to MTCRX For This Useful Post: | FastWhite (02-03-2014) |
|
|
#609 | ||
|
The SquadWhisperer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Ultramarine FR-S (STX)
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 681
Thanks: 383
Thanked 477 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think the two cats are within 6" of eachother, so I don't think we can just run a catted header. Can anyone confirm this please? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#610 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: -'02 PSM WRX, '94 Miata, '13 BRZ
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 438
Thanks: 188
Thanked 155 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
|
I feel the R1R might be faster than the Rival but not last as many runs in optimal condition. I need to order tires this week so I have them for Dixie and College Station. I won't be doing any other big events until Nationals and Blythville, unless someone wants a co-driver. Stuck on tire choice of grip vs gearing. I figured out the max speed at redline for what is out there. I realize I am talking about thousands in time but if I am spending money on tires for those events I want to get the right thing.
R1R 255/40 - 59.69 MPH - 9.6" tread width - $804 245/35 - 56.82 MPH - 9.4" tread width - $728 245/40 - 58.97 MPH - 8.9" tread width - $672 245/45 - 62.08 MPH - 9.3" tread width - $756 RIVAL 245/40 - 58.97 MPH - 9.1" tread width - $692 255/40 - 59.69 MPH - 9.5" tread width - $812
__________________
![]() Sponsered by:Chasebays/Corr Performance Tuning/KartBoy/Bad Panda Motorsports/Racer-X Fabrication STX Build thread 14th/67 SCCA Nationals (2014) |
|
|
|
|
|
#611 |
|
Dodging cones
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited, 93 Z28
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 264
Thanked 278 Times in 176 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
|
At Nats, everyone's Rivals were like that. We all discovered that Rivals really dont like driving on top of a thick layer of purple crack.
If you're doing Dunlop on a 9", I'd suggest the 255s. Sidewalls are MORE than stiff enough for a 255.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#612 | |
|
Dodging cones
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited, 93 Z28
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 264
Thanked 278 Times in 176 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
|
Quote:
The second can go away completely, IF you have one within 6" of the first one. It just happens that the overpipe is close enough to fall within this rule.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#613 | |
|
The SquadWhisperer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Ultramarine FR-S (STX)
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 681
Thanks: 383
Thanked 477 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
|
Quote:
In the rulebook (last time I read it, not long ago) it stated it had to be within 6" of the REAR cat, not the front. Given the front and rear cat are further than 6" apart, I can't see what you said being true. I will be running at the Canadian nationals, and I don't think "close enough" is going to cut it unless there is a specific section in the rules saying the FRS/BRZ actually are "close enough". Edit: Not trying to be a douche here, just trying to nail this down 100%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#614 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ Ltd
Location: PA
Posts: 458
Thanks: 265
Thanked 230 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
|
Quote:
How often are twins hitting the limiters in STX at the stock 7400 RPM limit? I hit it a lot on my STI (59 mph) but that also had gobs of torque and AWD traction. That's the recommendation on the Dunlop I've gotten as well. But the 255 Z2's are heavy compared to the 245 Z2 and the 255 Rival. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#615 | ||
|
Dodging cones
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited, 93 Z28
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 264
Thanked 278 Times in 176 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#616 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: BMW 135i, soon to BRZ
Location: LZ, IL
Posts: 113
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
online pdf's have search functions. It took me 30 seconds to get to the text I wanted:
"E. Catalytic converters: Any catalytic converters are allowed, but must attach within 6” of the original unit. Multiple catalytic converters may be replaced by a single unit. The inlet of the single replacement converter may be located no further downstream than 6” (152.4mm) along the piping flow path from the original exit of the final OE converter. The extents of an OE converter are defined by the expansion chamber in which the catalyst is contained, regardless of placement within larger exhaust sections. Replacement converters must have a minimum catalyst density of 100 cells per inch and minimum substrate length of 3” (76.2mm)." Start with the language most applicable and go from there (the bold). Everyone works with the same language. Definitively it can be no further downstream than 6" from the final. As to the space between, what do you think the rules say here, and what do you think a Protest Committee thinks the rules say? At a minimum the single converter can be 6" upstream or downstream from either location. the space between 6" downstream from the header and 6" upstream from the secondary? The clarifying sentence says it can be there. The first sentence seems to imply it can't. AKA depends on the committee. Also would depend on someone in class first throwing paper. If someone thinks you won because you put a cat further upstream than allowed and further downstream than allowed *at the same time*, goddamn that's a frivolous protest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thoughts on a "component" setup with a 3.5" dash and 6.5" door setup? | PatrickSAN | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 22 | 11-14-2012 02:12 PM |
| SCCA sway bar rules | gmookher | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 0 | 09-01-2012 06:48 PM |
| Suggestion for vendor rules... | Tainen | Site Announcements / Questions / Issues | 31 | 08-15-2012 01:53 PM |
| Rules for posting in this section | Hachiroku | User/Vendor/Sponsor Reviews, Feedback, Comments | 0 | 06-25-2012 11:02 AM |