|
|
#2185 | |
|
Dismember
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,562
Thanks: 2,153
Thanked 4,002 Times in 2,157 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2186 |
|
Road Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 Satin Pearl White
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 181
Thanked 544 Times in 359 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
my base line 154whp 141ftlb, stock
added Borla header and 3" performance exhaust, AFE DIF = 168whp 146ftlb Added Spritex with Delicious Base Tune = 190whp 173ftlb After logs reviewed = 216whp 181ftlb All the above been on our 95 RON evivalent to US 91OCT (our gas could be worse than your 91) and same dyno Outside temp recocorded on logs = 41 degrees celcius IAT ( Have the IAT sensor) temps recorded = 75 degrees celcius (need to verify were the IAT takes temps from) MAF max on dyno 180gs Need to get more airflow and reduce temps is the advise given |
|
|
|
|
|
#2187 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: GT86
Location: The Motherland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 140
Thanked 473 Times in 271 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
180g/sec is pretty low, however that doesn't actually mean how much air is going into your engine, it's just the output from the MAF sensor. Let's call it bananas. You have 180 bananas per second. I have just over 200. It's a lot colder here though, 5C this morning! It makes a huge difference!
I regularly see 70C ACT's with ambients around 20C, though. Sprintex have confirmed this is to be expected. If you're only getting 75C with 41C ambient, then that seems to show the performance of the charge cooler. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2188 |
|
Road Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 Satin Pearl White
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 181
Thanked 544 Times in 359 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Thanks
So you think installing the Intake duct would be a waste of money? the other thing concerning me is I have the OEM MAP sensor in at the moment and the AMP = 1.37, does this mean I'm getting .37 boost? or is the sensor maxed at 1.37 what should the boost be on the IC with 75mm pulley |
|
|
|
|
|
#2189 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: GT86
Location: The Motherland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 140
Thanked 473 Times in 271 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Sensor max'd. Boost will depend on restrictions in the system, massively affected by cam angles. You want as little boost as possible whilst retaining air flow. I get up to about 0.75 bar, but i'd prefer to drop that if I could. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2190 |
|
Road Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 Satin Pearl White
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 181
Thanked 544 Times in 359 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
if the stock MAP sensor is at max, would this affect performance?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2191 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: GT86
Location: The Motherland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 140
Thanked 473 Times in 271 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
No. It just means that any tables in the ECU which require a pressure input will not function correctly. So far this doesn't seem to have any impact on power on a supercharged engine. It's a bit different on a turbo car, running EcuTek, where you want to have boost cuts and custom tables which use manifold pressure as an input, e.g. the custom closed-loop boost control tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2192 |
|
Road Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 Satin Pearl White
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 181
Thanked 544 Times in 359 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So im worrying for nothing, car is achieving good results based on our poor quality fuel.
Time to try Octane Booster, I'm sure tuner will be able to get more gain. Thanks for your valuable advice |
|
|
|
|
|
#2193 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '14 S4
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 267
Thanks: 58
Thanked 93 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
2014 Audi S4 · 2010 xTerra Off-Road · 2014 Fiat 500e
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to KSpider For This Useful Post: | whataboutbob (11-15-2013) |
|
|
#2194 | |
|
AutoX-10/10ths every run
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S AT Firestorm
Location: San Marcos, CA, USA
Posts: 2,611
Thanks: 4,845
Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,025 Posts
Mentioned: 79 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2195 |
|
Road Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 Satin Pearl White
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 181
Thanked 544 Times in 359 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Put the car on the dyno today to see what the intercooler would do in the heat.
My previous run in cool temps of 28 degrees Celsius (84.4 Fahrenheit) was 160wkw 239nm (215whp 178ftlb) 3rd gear on 95 Ron (91 Oct) This run was at temps of 40 degrees Celsius (104 Fahrenheit). What I also did is compare the difference between a 3 rd gear pull to a 4th gear pull (95 RON =91 OCT) Due to heat I lost 10wkw 8nm (13whp 6ftlb) GRAPH WONT UPLOAD WILL SORT OUT SHORTLY |
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ryan86 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2196 |
|
Just a dude
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Scion FR-S 2013
Location: Edson, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,289
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 1,188 Times in 852 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So even with inter cooler but higher temp by 10 deg C you lost 10+ whp? While it's obvious the intercooler helps but questionable just "how much".
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2197 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '14 S4
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 267
Thanks: 58
Thanked 93 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Is the intercooler really supposed to help with the ambient temp on a few dyno pulls?
__________________
2014 Audi S4 · 2010 xTerra Off-Road · 2014 Fiat 500e
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2198 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,633 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
My IAT reading should be relocated to the manifold so I can watch on my P3 gauge but I'll also be running the MAF IAT and have a custom ∆temp map. This is being tested shortly before my install next month.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Innovative ideas to increase interior storage capacity? | swift996 | Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) | 0 | 01-30-2013 11:45 PM |
| AVO vs Innovative | diss7 | Forced Induction | 32 | 01-21-2013 07:15 PM |
| Not another need to drive topic | Sargy | Mid-Atlantic | 5 | 11-27-2012 01:18 PM |
| Technical topic sub-forums | OrbitalEllipses | Site Announcements / Questions / Issues | 1 | 07-18-2012 12:38 AM |
| Can you close the topic please? | Standardsuspension | Brakes, Suspension, Chassis | 14 | 06-26-2012 06:14 PM |