follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-10-2013, 05:29 PM   #15
DAN_BRZ
Senior Member
 
DAN_BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ Sport Tech
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 413
Thanks: 311
Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
IMO you would be good with either choice, i personally own the perrin 3" catback with 3" front pipe and 2.5" overpipe. the sound is by no means loud, but it is louder then stock. compared to a greddy evo, invidia it is quiet. the exhaust note sounds mean and aggressive, zero rasp, but not deafening. i have ppl telling me my car sounds amazing at local meets and just cruisin on the road at stop lights. u can hold a conversation at hwy speeds without screaming. ive heard the 2.5" resonated and 2.5" unresonated. unresonated sounds awful, raspy as hell, and recommend against buy it. the resonated sounds nice, not much louder then stock, but doesnt compare to the exhaust note of my 3".

whether u choose the 3" or 2.5" resonated ull be happy, if one makes a few more hp then the other ur butt dyno or ur foot isnt going to notice a difference.
DAN_BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2013, 05:34 PM   #16
My_First_Subaru
Member
 
My_First_Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: SWP Subaru BRZ
Location: san fernando valley
Posts: 31
Thanks: 6
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanks everyone for their input
My_First_Subaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2013, 07:20 PM   #17
Efenys
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Galaxy Blue 6sp BRZ LTD
Location: Lancaster/Hoboken
Posts: 76
Thanks: 16
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
I got a 3" and have no regrets. FI may/may not be in my future in a few years after i see some longevity tests. I got it because the HP increases are negligible and i like the 3" deep sound a bit better.

After all "You buy a catback for the performance right???"
Efenys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2013, 09:13 PM   #18
reardrv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: NH
Posts: 109
Thanks: 56
Thanked 40 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by industrial View Post
Also, gases don't expand on their own when they cool. If they do, you lose velocity. Not that exhaust velocities really matter beyond the header in our cars anyway.
Exhaust gasses do expand as they cool, which will cause a loss in velocity. Why do you think people wrap/ceramic coat headers and down pipes? In my example a better way to phrase it might be that they cool as they expand, also causing a reduction in velocity. And velocity does still matter past the headers, just not nearly as much.
reardrv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 05:58 PM   #19
Mobius357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '15 WRX '13 Legacy '07 Colorado
Location: Seacoast NH
Posts: 337
Thanks: 10
Thanked 118 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Gases contract when they cool, not expand, given no change in pressure. PV=nRT is idealized but Volume and Temperature still vary directly and not inversely.
Mobius357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 10:21 PM   #20
reardrv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: NH
Posts: 109
Thanks: 56
Thanked 40 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Remember exhaust gasses aren't stagnant in a chamber, they are rapidly expanding as they travel through an exhaust. And what happens when gasses expand, a temperature drop. Just like when you crack the valve on a tank of compressed air, the air will come out cold, sometimes even producing small ice chunks. Inversely when you compress a gas, like in forced induction applications, it gets warmer.

If the gasses expand too rapidly, they cool too rapidly and lose velocity, increasing back pressure. This is why an exhaust that is too big, especially in the beginning can hurt performance.

However since you can not stop the gas from expanding and cooling, you do want to give it more room as it travels down the exhaust.

A good example would be a high end motorcycle exhaust. The best performing exhausts from company's like Akrapovic, Arrow, or Yoshimura have very carefully selected pipe diameters that taper out as they move towards the end. The old school Kerkers and Vance & Hines exhausts use the same principal, which is one of the reasons they made big power in those early bikes.

Now on our specific car, I would say that despite a 2.0L displacement due to the specific output of the motor there may be a benefit in going 3". Remember exhaust volume is a factor too. And the volume produced by our 200hp, high revving, high compression motor will be greater than that of most other cars of similar displacement.

Personally I think that the jury is still out on whether a 3" exhaust helps or not. If we are talking a forced induction application, 3" all day long. Maybe bigger if you want a giant turbo, huge horsepower setup. But in my opinion if you plan on future upgrades, why buy a 2.5" only to buy a 3" when you do finally go FI?
reardrv is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to reardrv For This Useful Post:
mwjcyber (10-03-2014)
Old 10-11-2013, 11:25 PM   #21
My_First_Subaru
Member
 
My_First_Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: SWP Subaru BRZ
Location: san fernando valley
Posts: 31
Thanks: 6
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for input. I'm thinking of going 3". Although there is that thought in the possibility in a loss in case I do not fi. Lol. I'm a pretty indecisive person. Money wise it's a small difference between the two but If I do get 2.5 then fi it would be a bother to have to get another exhaust.
My_First_Subaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 11:39 PM   #22
industrial
Add lightness!
 
industrial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 17' WRX
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,253
Thanks: 380
Thanked 888 Times in 411 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by reardrv View Post
Remember exhaust gasses aren't stagnant in a chamber, they are rapidly expanding as they travel through an exhaust. And what happens when gasses expand, a temperature drop. Just like when you crack the valve on a tank of compressed air, the air will come out cold, sometimes even producing small ice chunks. Inversely when you compress a gas, like in forced induction applications, it gets warmer.

If the gasses expand too rapidly, they cool too rapidly and lose velocity, increasing back pressure. This is why an exhaust that is too big, especially in the beginning can hurt performance.

However since you can not stop the gas from expanding and cooling, you do want to give it more room as it travels down the exhaust.

A good example would be a high end motorcycle exhaust. The best performing exhausts from company's like Akrapovic, Arrow, or Yoshimura have very carefully selected pipe diameters that taper out as they move towards the end. The old school Kerkers and Vance & Hines exhausts use the same principal, which is one of the reasons they made big power in those early bikes.

Now on our specific car, I would say that despite a 2.0L displacement due to the specific output of the motor there may be a benefit in going 3". Remember exhaust volume is a factor too. And the volume produced by our 200hp, high revving, high compression motor will be greater than that of most other cars of similar displacement.

Personally I think that the jury is still out on whether a 3" exhaust helps or not. If we are talking a forced induction application, 3" all day long. Maybe bigger if you want a giant turbo, huge horsepower setup. But in my opinion if you plan on future upgrades, why buy a 2.5" only to buy a 3" when you do finally go FI?
Too large of an exhaust could ruin exhaust velocities because they act as expansion chambers. The exhaust is cooled from expanding rapidly. This is a concern with a NA car because of the exhaust scavenging effect. This is why you may lose some power going too large on a NA setup. Backpressure is probably more of a function of the cats and merge angles more than anything with our car.
industrial is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to industrial For This Useful Post:
reardrv (10-12-2013)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
difficulties finding Perrin 3" cat-back jonbonazza Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 2 05-27-2013 02:34 PM
Long "Scion" sticker on back bumper CaptainSlow Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 7 04-12-2013 10:31 AM
My Wife Found a New "Cat Back" Exhaust Toyota86Fan Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 6 10-15-2012 08:17 PM
the "Your order has been pushed back" support group Surok AUSTRALIA 143 09-11-2012 02:52 AM
"Memory" on seat-back tilt? sesmls BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 20 06-08-2012 12:42 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.