follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-18-2013, 11:18 PM   #407
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Science!
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2013, 01:21 PM   #408
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,520
Thanks: 3,542
Thanked 7,416 Times in 3,034 Posts
Mentioned: 311 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by iketeru View Post
I've been thinking about replacing the bushings in the rear subframe and diff mounts, but I'm reluctant to charge ahead without knowing the reason for doing so, even though it's a relatively cheap upgrade. whenever I see underbody videos of the movement in these locations, it seems to me that they exist to eliminate smaller vibrations which cause NVH.

my question is, is making these locations more stiff by replacing with poly equivalent to slightly increasing the damping in the coilovers, or do you think the dampers were designed to work with the bushings to start with? that is, if you put in poly, are you feeling the damping as it was meant to be, or not going to get enough damping?

thanks for the great thread, let me know if i'm in over my head.
You'll feel some interesting things when you replace soft bushings with poly or solid bushings...enough that you may adjust your damping. Not "equivalent" to increasing damping but some of the things you thought were one thing actually were the bushings deflecting.

- Andy
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 01:00 AM   #409
Gixxersixxerman
Senior Member
 
Gixxersixxerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Toyota GT86, 66 beetle, 11 GSXR 750
Location: Las Vegas, NV.
Posts: 1,382
Thanks: 575
Thanked 836 Times in 436 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I have a question... I installed RSR sporti coilovers, had my alignment done today.. One of the guys that is a good autoX driver, race track driver, and instructor, did my alignment.. After talking and everything.. We decided to 0 the toe front and rear.. The same way he drives his.. I've looked and looked and it looks as if this is a common setting.. But most articles I read suggest a 1/8" toe in, for the rear.. 0 Toe, in the rear seems to be recommended for real aggressive street driving, trackday.. So my question is, what am I looking at when I get to the track, what should I expect.. It seemed more.... Responsive, maybe is the word.. I wouldn't say twitchy, but maybe that could be a descriptive word for it.. I didn't feel nervous or anything just a lot more.. The car deffiently went where the steering wheel moved.. Instantly..

So is this going to be a lot more tail happy, Mike, you rode with me, is this something that should be ok to run with how you feel my experience lvl is?? I just don't want to dive into turn one or two at streets and go ass end into the dirt
Gixxersixxerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 09:13 AM   #410
7thgear
i'm sorry, what?
 
7thgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,508 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Hey guys, have a question for you

i'm trying to create a simple and effective explanation why R-Comp tires would prefer stiffer suspensions, and that their use on OEM sprung cars doesn't quite bring out the best in them (ie, autocross being a BIG compromise), and likewise that Street Tires lose their optimum effect if put on an overly sprung car.

i'm a little fuzzy on the details though.
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
7thgear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 7thgear For This Useful Post:
Dimman (10-06-2013)
Old 10-06-2013, 05:58 PM   #411
Captain Snooze
Because compromise ®
 
Captain Snooze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,823
Thanks: 4,053
Thanked 9,565 Times in 4,199 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Andy@Racecomp
Off topic but sort of handling related.
Could you please tell me how the Recaro CS compares to stock? Would a person describe the CS as being more or less snug than stock?

(I am asking about the CS because it is the only after market seat I am aware of that has the option of an air bag which is required to keep it legal here.)
Captain Snooze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 06:27 PM   #412
wootwoot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 188
Thanked 462 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hey guys,

What is the best solution to adjusting rear camber? I know the upper arm is the best location, but all reports I have seen say that the whiteline adjustable bushings are junk. They are difficult to adjust, hard to install, and apparently the hardware corrodes quickly causing other interesting issues.

On the other hand there seem to be many lower arms for sale that are quality units. Easy to install and adjust. But I know this isn't the best location to change camber from. Also, being mostly a street car, I do not want bearings in my suspension which most of the lower arms have.

Head spinning....
wootwoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 07:11 PM   #413
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wootwoot View Post
Hey guys,

What is the best solution to adjusting rear camber? I know the upper arm is the best location, but all reports I have seen say that the whiteline adjustable bushings are junk. They are difficult to adjust, hard to install, and apparently the hardware corrodes quickly causing other interesting issues.

On the other hand there seem to be many lower arms for sale that are quality units. Easy to install and adjust. But I know this isn't the best location to change camber from. Also, being mostly a street car, I do not want bearings in my suspension which most of the lower arms have.

Head spinning....
I have heard some people running modified eccentric bolts on the rear lca pick ups for camber adjustment. Not sure if it's a good idea, but it will be very easy to adjust and also very cheap.
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 07:14 PM   #414
wootwoot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 188
Thanked 462 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
I have heard some people running modified eccentric bolts on the rear lca pick ups for camber adjustment. Not sure if it's a good idea, but it will be very easy to adjust and also very cheap.
I don't think you can torque those bolts down very much.... That is why most people suggest OEM crash bolts for the front of the car over aftermarket camber bolts....
wootwoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 07:35 PM   #415
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
For the sake of discussion I want to ask about tires and spring rates. What are the limits or recommendations for spring rates for various different levels of tire grip?

For instance, It seems CSG have been getting good results with relatively high spring rates on RS3/AD08 level tires. 10K/12K springs.

Another expample is my Swift BRZ spec springs with stock tires. The tires will lose traction rather prematurely with the 3.8K/4.5K combo. I would say the spring rates are at the upper limit if not over the limit of the factory Michelins.

What would be the upper limits for spring rates for say... Hankook V12 or other grippier summer tires 240-300TW range on this chassis? Assuming you will also provide decent damping for the suggested spring rates. What about R-comps "street-tires" such as the NT-01?
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to solidONE For This Useful Post:
Dimman (10-06-2013)
Old 10-06-2013, 07:39 PM   #416
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wootwoot View Post
I don't think you can torque those bolts down very much.... That is why most people suggest OEM crash bolts for the front of the car over aftermarket camber bolts....
The lower SPC bolt that replaces the 14mm bolt is rated at 76 ft-lb, while the 16mm upper camber bolt is rated at 106 ft-lb.
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 08:13 PM   #417
wootwoot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 188
Thanked 462 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
The lower SPC bolt that replaces the 14mm bolt is rated at 76 ft-lb, while the 16mm upper camber bolt is rated at 106 ft-lb.
Really?! What is the stock 14mm rated for?
wootwoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 09:36 PM   #418
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wootwoot View Post
Really?! What is the stock 14mm rated for?
Not sure... My guess is about 80 ft lb of torque
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 12:41 AM   #419
koevasi
Senior Member
 
koevasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: 1
Location: 1
Posts: 109
Thanks: 47
Thanked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
For the sake of discussion I want to ask about tires and spring rates. What are the limits or recommendations for spring rates for various different levels of tire grip?

For instance, It seems CSG have been getting good results with relatively high spring rates on RS3/AD08 level tires. 10K/12K springs.

Another expample is my Swift BRZ spec springs with stock tires. The tires will lose traction rather prematurely with the 3.8K/4.5K combo. I would say the spring rates are at the upper limit if not over the limit of the factory Michelins.

What would be the upper limits for spring rates for say... Hankook V12 or other grippier summer tires 240-300TW range on this chassis? Assuming you will also provide decent damping for the suggested spring rates. What about R-comps "street-tires" such as the NT-01?
Also very interested.

I recently changed from 205/55/16 PS3s to 215/45/17 AD08s (not the 'monster' 245/255 section tires). Granted, with 7kg/mm spring rates I felt that 205s just weren't taking the increased load all that well and the car felt overly stiff all the time, and very harsh most of the time. However, it had a nice low speed handling balance (on smoother surfaces) of just the right amount of predictable understeer and oversteer. I do mountain runs mostly and I don't want or need a massively tail happy car.

With AD08, the springs don't seem to be bothered at all. For some reason there is also a lot more oversteer in low to mid speed corners and playing around with rear dampening settings don't seem to do much. Steering also feels a lot more vague than before. Am I just over-tired? Been thinking about sway bar options but I need to understand what's going on with my car.

Sorry if this question is a little beneath everyone else!

Cheers, Steven
koevasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 01:35 AM   #420
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by koevasi View Post
Also very interested.

I recently changed from 205/55/16 PS3s to 215/45/17 AD08s (not the 'monster' 245/255 section tires). Granted, with 7kg/mm spring rates I felt that 205s just weren't taking the increased load all that well and the car felt overly stiff all the time, and very harsh most of the time. However, it had a nice low speed handling balance (on smoother surfaces) of just the right amount of predictable understeer and oversteer. I do mountain runs mostly and I don't want or need a massively tail happy car.

With AD08, the springs don't seem to be bothered at all. For some reason there is also a lot more oversteer in low to mid speed corners and playing around with rear dampening settings don't seem to do much. Steering also feels a lot more vague than before. Am I just over-tired? Been thinking about sway bar options but I need to understand what's going on with my car.

Sorry if this question is a little beneath everyone else!

Cheers, Steven
I believe the oversteer you are experiencing is partly caused by the increased grip out front from the upgraded tires. Before you purchase anything else, you can try unhooking the rear sway bar from the end links and tie it away against the subframe with zipties.

I did this and was pleasantly surprised at how it behaved. This was with factory suspension on RS3 hankook tires. Though with the factory springs it would wallow on long turns, I'm assuming the rear suspension was bouncing off the bumstops. With your spring rates you probably wont experience this. The rear end gripped really well with the rear sway bar unhooked.

What is your set up? What dampers and alignment?
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Suspension Discussion Thread - Let's Get Nerdy Andrew@ORT Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 174 02-13-2016 03:17 PM
RallySport Directs Everything Suspension thread!! RallySport Direct Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 21 07-02-2014 05:31 PM
The OFFICIAL Ohlins Coilover Suspension thread - High End Competition Suspension ModBargains.com Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 63 05-22-2013 08:15 AM
2012 Team USA vs the 1992 Dream Team ERZperformance Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 1 09-14-2012 06:19 PM
Team build thread; PROJECT.STH trueno86power Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 0 03-02-2010 10:13 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.