FRS Acceleration (520lbs of People)

[NotSoJDM]

Originally Posted by Razz

The Civic SI has more RWHP.

The FRS is only 130 RWHP.

Where'd you pull that # from?

All stock dynos I see are 160-170whp. Mine was 162whp.

[Mr.Jay]

Yes I notce a differen e whenever I drive someone

Usually ends up with me commenting how they are slowing me down with their weight, a slap in the face and no return call for another date haha

[Tiremonkey0824]

Originally Posted by Razz

The Civic SI has more RWHP.

The FRS is only 130 RWHP.

I didn't know the civic had any REAR wheel horsepower...

[Mr.Jay]

Originally Posted by NotSoJDM

Where'd you pull that # from?

All stock dynos I see are 160-170whp. Mine was 162whp.

That will depend on dyno

Civic si deff makes more tq with its 2.4k engine and it will deff put down more hp too since the loss in the fwd car is less than a rwd

[NotSoJDM]

Originally Posted by Mr.Jay

That will depend on dyno

Civic si deff makes more tq with its 2.4k engine and it will deff put down more hp too since the loss in the fwd car is less than a rwd

Yes whp varies with dyno type. But do you really think its going to make a 30-40whp difference on a 200hp car? No. 130whp would equate to a 35% drivetrain loss. RWD cars should see around 20% loss.

You want to see whp of si vs frs?

Here:
http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/garag...rs-dynoed.html