follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-13-2013, 07:08 AM   #29
scott_lenhart
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: Ford
Location: NY
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueDubbinTDI View Post
um taking weight away from a car gives all the benefits from other parts all in 1. MPG, acceleration, and handling all improve with weight loss. That's why the most expensive performance cars are almost completely made of carbon fiber. A 500hp vehicle can make the same 0-60 times as a 1000hp vehicle all because of weight. That's where this car shines. It starts at around 2750lbs. Many cars cant dream of that weight these days. Wheels, exhaust, spare tire + tools and (heavy) battery delete can get you down another 100 easily. I cant think of a downside of losing too much weight in a car
Absolutely true-I agree.
scott_lenhart is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to scott_lenhart For This Useful Post:
FT86Z (11-30-2015)
Old 08-13-2013, 08:14 AM   #30
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thing is, it's a helluva lot easier to add 10% power than it is to subtract 10% weight. I'm a huge stickler on weight, but for a street car you can just about forget about taking out any amount that would be meaningful, that you could FEEL, while maintaining streetability. Most important thing is to start with a car that is already reasonably light.

I'm always annoyed with factory "special lightweight" models that remove useful things like A/C and stereo only to shave ~100 lb. off of the car that they designed to be too big/luxurious than it should have been in the first place. In particular, Boxster Spyder. "OOOH, no cupholder, it's a REAL serious lightweight race car!" While it weighs 95% of what a normal Boxster S with stereo, A/C, and a real convertible top weighs, and the same as the base Boxster with those features. BFD! Also, it remains a good 300-400 lb. more than a Miata, 800-900 lb. more than an Elise.

Also, the new Z/28. OOOH, it only has one speaker to SAVE WEIGHT! Meanwhile, it's still a 3800 lb. pig. It's like a very bad joke. Do people actually think it's neat to be able to point out their car doesn't have stereo sound in the name of saving about one tenth of 1% of their car's weight?! Idiots...

Anyway, light weight is very important, but it's just about impossible and can be very expensive to "add on" after the fact.
Designed-in from the get-go, lighter weight is CHEAPER. Don't make the car too big and heavy to begin with!

Kudos to Toyobaru for doing a great job on the twins.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
akyp (12-05-2013), Anthony (08-14-2013), exmayol (10-27-2013), nalc (08-13-2013), PoorMansRacing (12-05-2013), Scooby South (08-13-2013), SirBrass (12-05-2013), u/Josh (12-13-2013), Vincent Nguyen (12-04-2016)
Old 08-13-2013, 08:33 AM   #31
BlueDubbinTDI
Senior Member
 
BlueDubbinTDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, 2012 MCS
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 1,975
Thanks: 943
Thanked 570 Times in 356 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Thing is, it's a helluva lot easier to add 10% power than it is to subtract 10% weight. I'm a huge stickler on weight, but for a street car you can just about forget about taking out any amount that would be meaningful, that you could FEEL, while maintaining streetability. Most important thing is to start with a car that is already reasonably light.

I'm always annoyed with factory "special lightweight" models that remove useful things like A/C and stereo only to shave ~100 lb. off of the car that they designed to be too big/luxurious than it should have been in the first place. In particular, Boxster Spyder. "OOOH, no cupholder, it's a REAL serious lightweight race car!" While it weighs 95% of what a normal Boxster S with stereo, A/C, and a real convertible top weighs, and the same as the base Boxster with those features. BFD! Also, it remains a good 300-400 lb. more than a Miata, 800-900 lb. more than an Elise.

Also, the new Z/28. OOOH, it only has one speaker to SAVE WEIGHT! Meanwhile, it's still a 3800 lb. pig. It's like a very bad joke. Do people actually think it's neat to be able to point out their car doesn't have stereo sound in the name of saving about one tenth of 1% of their car's weight?! Idiots...

Anyway, light weight is very important, but it's just about impossible and can be very expensive to "add on" after the fact.
Designed-in from the get-go, lighter weight is CHEAPER. Don't make the car too big and heavy to begin with!

Kudos to Toyobaru for doing a great job on the twins.
I like the post. I like what VW is doing to their next GTI. Its losing 200 pounds due to massive R&D to get every ounce off and adding over 50tq with a new engine while also adding like 2mpg. I believe its going to be 210hp/250tq (VW numbers are at the wheels) and 3000 pounds from the factory. I REALLY cant wait for that car to release..then again..im a German fanboy more than JDM lol. This car kinda fell into my lap but it just feels so right. I wish the Europeans could make an affordable machine like the twins. The closest thing to it is the $80k Jag F-Type...
BlueDubbinTDI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 09:12 AM   #32
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Waitaminute, is the current GTI really 3200 lb.?! Sweet merciful crap...

We've come a long way from the original 1800 lb Rabbit
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 09:18 AM   #33
BlueDubbinTDI
Senior Member
 
BlueDubbinTDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, 2012 MCS
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 1,975
Thanks: 943
Thanked 570 Times in 356 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Waitaminute, is the current GTI really 3200 lb.?! Sweet merciful crap...

We've come a long way from the original 1800 lb Rabbit
Yeah dude everything is getting heavier. More computer and safety shit ide imagine lol
BlueDubbinTDI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 09:41 AM   #34
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Looks more like 3050 lb. for a 2012 GTI: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...swagen-gti.pdf

Still, anything over 2800 lb. for a "hot hatch" is, to me, obscenely overweight, even in this day and age.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 11:05 AM   #35
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,798
Thanks: 2,187
Thanked 4,243 Times in 2,221 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
The weight of the GTI changes a lot depending on configuration.
- A base 2-door with manual transmission is 3034 lbs.
- A 4-door DSG model with moonroof weighs in at 3213 lbs.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 11:05 AM   #36
Suberman
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ Sport Tech Satin White
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,228
Thanks: 147
Thanked 320 Times in 225 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Modern cars aren't built to drive, they're built to crash.

It is a self reinforcing parasitic problem. Occupant crash protection weighs a lot especially rollover and side impact reinforcements where crush space is very limited.

Once you add weight to give more crash protection you add kinetic energy to the crash event leading to the need for yet more crash protection. This cycle is extremely difficult to break.

Heavier bodies require more power and heavier suspension with larger wheels
and tires.

Remember the 1975 "Golf" was a three door, 4 spd with a 1.5 sohc carbureted engine, 13 inch wheels with 145/80 tires and a clever modified beam axle rear suspension which combined the axle with a roll bar. It couldn't get out if its own way but compared to similar competing products it was a revelation at the time. Made the last of the contemporary sports cars look silly.
Suberman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Suberman For This Useful Post:
akyp (12-05-2013), chas3wba0 (12-05-2013), n2oinferno (08-13-2013), SuperTom (09-30-2018)
Old 08-13-2013, 02:07 PM   #37
dotdotdotPaul
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 38
Thanks: 12
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I can't believe nobody's made the joke about "my doctor's always telling me to lose weight."

Although this might be a motivation for me to lose those 50 pounds she's always on about.

...Paul
dotdotdotPaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 02:44 PM   #38
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suberman View Post
Modern cars aren't built to drive, they're built to crash.
It is a self reinforcing parasitic problem. Occupant crash protection weighs a lot especially rollover and side impact reinforcements where crush space is very limited.
Once you add weight to give more crash protection you add kinetic energy to the crash event leading to the need for yet more crash protection. This cycle is extremely difficult to break.
Heavier bodies require more power and heavier suspension with larger wheels
and tires.
Progress should be doing MORE with LESS (or, the same amount, anyway).

FR-S/BRZ are a perfect case in point. This car is precisely a brand new S13 240SX, at the same price point, with some added performance and much greater chassis rigidity, with essentially zero weight penalty vs. the 240SX from 25 years ago.

Meanwhile, the GTI has piled on about 800 lb. of additional mass.

Just because not many companies are making the effort doesn't mean it's impossible to have reasonably lightweight cars even in the face of modern safety regs.

If Toyobaru can give us a 2750 lb. FR-S/BRZ, I would suggest that a similar-weight or even lighter fwd GTI is totally doable. If the will was there...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 03:11 PM   #39
Stevo22
Senior Member
 
Stevo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: GR86
Location: TN
Posts: 341
Thanks: 66
Thanked 85 Times in 62 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
A national level driver in my SCCA region joked about when he was racing a Miata the wheel weights went down to like 8 lbs a wheel, but he was still 50 lbs over weight. He said he was shaving weight every where but himself.
Stevo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 04:17 PM   #40
Gary in NJ
Senior Member
 
Gary in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: WR Blue BRZ, 240Z
Location: Amongst the twisty roads
Posts: 587
Thanks: 21
Thanked 412 Times in 206 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Progress should be doing MORE with LESS (or, the same amount, anyway).

FR-S/BRZ are a perfect case in point. This car is precisely a brand new S13 240SX, at the same price point, with some added performance and much greater chassis rigidity, with essentially zero weight penalty vs. the 240SX from 25 years ago.
Good point. A more extreme example is my 1972 240Z. The 240Z weighs in at 2400 lbs. This (two-seat) car was considered very light weight in its day. Fast forward 40 years and Subaru & Toyota have managed to add crush zones, airbags, electric everything and two useless seats in a car with very similar dimensions with only a 300 pound increase.

It really is an incredible feat and the product of obsessive engineering.
__________________
Phantom ESC, ECUtek Tune, Nameless Front Pipe & Axle Back, Enkei RS+M 17x8 et35, OEM+Ref


Gary in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gary in NJ For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (12-05-2013)
Old 10-27-2013, 03:37 AM   #41
diss7
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,181 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quick weight loss for street 86.
Take everything out of the boot.
Take the back seats out, they're pointless anyway. The brackets and seatbelt receivers are just sitting there too, pull them out.
Pop the 3rd brake light out.
Leave the cover on the parcel tray. Looks like crap over wise and it weighs nothing. Leave rear side panels as well, no weight there. If you do take them out though, you'll also be able to get to rear belts. I didn't though, as that panel is joined to other panels around b pillar.
Rear mats as well, don't need them.
Under hood, boxer cover thing on manifold. Take bumper off, do you need the driving lights? Pull them out. Bumper beam, don't need that. Window washer bottle, just wash window when you put petrol in.
Do you need air con? Car is pretty cool with windows down and fan on. Pull that out too. The condenser, hoses, hear exchanger at the front. You'll need the JDM RC pulley to replace condenser though.

By now, you'll have a shit load of parts, and it's taken 2 hours and no money, well unless you took the ac out and had to buy the RC pulley.

Probably saved 50kg so far.

Take car for drive, it sounds and feels awesome. Let's do more of this. Have to spend money now.
Wilwood or AP racing brakes. They're lighter, but also unsprung, the best kind of weight saving. They might expensive, but just do it. Anyone saying pads and fluid on stock brakes will be good enough must drive like a pansy. It isn't.
Let's make car rev better, with lighter parts.
Toda pulley kit. Only kit I know that's under drive. Most kits are just lighter, this kit also drains motor less.
Toda flywheel and pulley clutch. Don't get a cheap/alloy flywheel.
Carbon driveshaft.
Tomei titanium cat back.
Take car for drive now.
Oh, get some wheels and tyres, but the stuff above will have bigger impact. Do stuff above first.
Wheels are hard, all stuff above is hidden. Wheels still need to look good. Everyone obsesses about wheel weight, but then put dumb 'meaty' tyres on, so end up with heavier wheel/tyre combo than stock. 205/40 semi slick on stock wheel will weigh less than forged wheel with big dumb tyre, and will have MORE grip. Put semi on forged wheel for win if you can.
205/40/17 semi (or any tyre that size also lowers overall gearing, which will make car feel even lighter.
More savings? Headers, seats. Bought all I can think of atm. That's the main ones anyway. At this point you'll just be chasing one or two pounds, and will be costly. Just wait till you need to replace something, then find the lightest functional option you can. Dont just but mods because mods are cool, you'll just undo all the coolness that you have done if you've done all the above.

Go race poorly setup poorly modded turbo cars around hills. Welcome to the new age, takumi.
diss7 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to diss7 For This Useful Post:
Anthony (10-27-2013), Efferalgan (12-10-2013), PoorMansRacing (12-05-2013), SuperTom (04-29-2018)
Old 10-27-2013, 03:52 AM   #42
Anthony
Weight Nazi
 
Anthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 13 FRS -399lb, 11 335is, 05 Tiburon
Location: Biloxi, MS / Gulf Coast 86
Posts: 3,702
Thanks: 5,009
Thanked 3,714 Times in 1,765 Posts
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by diss7 View Post
Leave the cover on the parcel tray.
...What? Can you convert this to US-English?

Quote:
Originally Posted by diss7 View Post
You'll need the JDM RC pulley to replace condenser though.
You have a link to this? I've tried looking before - unsuccessfully. I didn't know it was called an RC pulley though. I'm looking again right now, and so far no good results.
__________________

Build Thread | The Venus Project | Any car which holds together for a whole race is too heavy.
Anthony is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
weightloss, you're all too fat!


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weight Loss Potential Thread Entropy Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 79 01-16-2017 05:51 PM
≥≥≥ WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM ≤≤≤ Lightweight battery kit. New Years Resolution Complete!!! FT-86 SpeedFactory Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 52 05-27-2013 12:19 AM
CEL, Loss of Traction Light, Loss of Power pituala Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 19 09-05-2012 12:23 PM
Weight loss potential? SevenTenSplit Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 10 12-10-2011 03:16 PM
weight loss cynic Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 36 10-24-2011 05:04 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.