|
|
#15 |
|
Mr. Sarcasm
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: 2016 VW Jetta TSI Sport 5-Speed
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,729
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 753 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
What jump in price? The Gen Coupe sells for $22k with turbo, RWD, heavy because it's loaded with other things. Why offer a car with less for more?
They should just offer a Turbo package at launch for those who desire it, and leave it NA stock.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Drives: Boosted Scion tC, 350z
Location: TN
Posts: 1,779
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2003 WRX
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Looking back, the Turbo Subaru Engines are a lot more stout than the NA Subaru Engines because they need to be, so they are a much better platform to start with. Then there's the issue of warranty, and reliability, etc... All I know is that if I put the money in to turbo an NA car, I would be a little upset if they then came out with a turbo car from the factory... And especially if it had other goodies like a stronger transmission, better TBD/LSD... If I have learned anything in my years playing with Subarus it is that you don't buy a WRX, and hope to turn it into an STI. Sure, you might be able to get your WRX to a point where it is as fast as an STI, but if you put that same money into an STI, it would be a lot faster. And even if it is as fast in a straight line, it is not the same. Not at all... And there is a much lower ceiling with a WRX when you are talking about getting to the point where things start to break and need to be replaced like transmission and suspension. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Delights in pure handling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Dragon, I know you are all about the hp. But for some of us we also value reliability, warranty and for Subaru to do the R&D. More important to me then a few more hp from the aftermarket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 03 ep3
Location: sacramento
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So then is it likely for them to release two versions to make both partys happy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Toyota
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 134
Thanked 138 Times in 90 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Hey, I think we should have thread for the ones that only want a NA Toyobaru. In this case we'll know who are these members and discuss anything about the NA engine, without that the turbo fans come up and turn everything in a turbo debate. Why do all turbo lovers want to convert us?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered you sir
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I dont want to convert anyone, but I dont want anyone saying what 'we' want... Speak for yourselves. Id enjoy boost if subaru gets it right, it would be a welcomed increase in performance and tunability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Mr. Sarcasm
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: 2016 VW Jetta TSI Sport 5-Speed
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,729
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 753 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
Turbo wanters.. read my post ^^^^
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
i-club
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: 2006 GDB
Location: Nor*Cal i-Club.com
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
i'd prefer to stick with N/A but i wouldnt mind if it had a turbo/supercharger.
N/A>supercharger>turbo |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: E36 5.7 V8
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 1,573
Thanks: 194
Thanked 198 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I read the OP but couldn't understand why he doesn't want a turbo. For me I've got the reasons down to:
1. Cheaper 2. Simpler in terms of reliability with modding 3. The Scion(the one I'll be getting) won't ever get a turbo 4. No waiting Then again . . . 1. Nearly every [grassroots] drift car has a turbo(or a V8) 2. It would be the S15 the US never had 3. You won't be left behind when youre at a HPDE with corvettes, porches etc. 4. You'd have a killer power to weight ratio without doing any real work If I was to keep the FR-S and do a DIY turbo kit 1. I expect cooling to be an issue 2. big $$ 3. Tuning problems? Ej swap would be 1. Cheap 2. Proven and Reliable 3. Will need custom piping which isn't a big problem 4. Will push 350 WHP without much effort. That's how I see it.
__________________
I wish I was cool enough to have an FR-S
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Mr. Sarcasm
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: 2016 VW Jetta TSI Sport 5-Speed
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,729
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 753 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
Oh man I love it more thinking in that ^
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Toyota
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 134
Thanked 138 Times in 90 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
WTF! For those wanting a turbo just wait for the new WRX. Modded it'll be as fast as an Aventador (till 280 km/h), it also has AWD. The BRZ is just the first step before being able to control a Dirft Ford Mustang or a Grip Porsche 911.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Grumpy Old Man
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2016 Halo FR-S, 2010 Tundra, 80 626
Location: Georgia
Posts: 293
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
WRX also has 2 more doors, lots more space, higher CoG, but the most important fact to me isn't that it IS AWD, but that it ISN'T RWD. Not to mention it weighs a lot more. You've made similar statements before, and while I'm not trying to be insulting here, it seems you just don't get the point that those in the pro-turbo crowd are trying to make. The FRS/BRZ that I buy will never out accelerate my 71 Chevelle, and in all likelihood won't even out accelerate my S14 (which weighs about the same at this point, 2850 w/ me and 3/4 tank of gas). It probably won't slide better than my S14, or with a few minor suspension tweaks, out handle it. It is however newer, more reliable, and in general nicer all around than either of those cars. If a turbo model was made, would I take it over the N/A, probably. Of course cost is a factor there, but to be honest everybody is saying 200hp/151ftlb is enough. They're right, it is enough, for now. Eventually most enthusiasts end up wanting more out of the car. Whether it be relatively cost inefficient N/A route, FI route, car diet route (always a good idea IMO), or some combination thereof. Does EVERYONE want more power, no, some people will leave theirs completely stock, there's nothing wrong with that. Some people will just do suspension work, tires, etc. Most of us I think will do a mix of several things I'd wager. I guess the point I'm trying to make is that if a factory Turbo version is available it will sell like hotcakes. It will probably be more powerful and faster in stock trim than a cam'd, ITB'd, full exhaust N/A car. It will probably have much more potential for higher power levels with less money. Of course every part of that is a trade off in either reliability or fuel efficiency, but once you start modding your NA car for more power, you're going to run into the same issues, at a higher cost, for lesser gains. Does more power mean it's better, no, not one bit. It would be different, the dynamic of the car would change and tuning strategies would change around that new dynamic. The real moral of the story is WRX =/= Turbo AS1, so stop acting like it does.
__________________
2016 Halo FR-S, 2010 Tundra, 92 325i convertible, 80 Mazda 626, 62 Impala
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
BRZerhood Lurker #13
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 15 DGM BRZ Premium
Location: charon's ferry
Posts: 892
Thanks: 377
Thanked 225 Times in 128 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
If I had to go FI on my BRZ, I'd go with a mild supercharger option. Not really looking to make monster high end numbers and I like the no-lag throttle response from the blower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbo FR-S | Mino | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 24 | 12-16-2011 08:42 AM |
| turbo yes | BMWDAD | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 79 | 12-06-2011 12:58 AM |
| Turbo or Suppercharger or none | xc | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 12 | 11-17-2011 05:40 PM |
| Geneva Preview: Techart to debut 911 Turbo, Turbo S | vh_supra26 | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 1 | 02-22-2010 06:20 PM |