follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-21-2011, 12:42 PM   #29
Dragonitti
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Drives: Boosted Scion tC, 350z
Location: TN
Posts: 1,779
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMDZK View Post
I suppose I worded that incorrectly. The tC does indeed have a very strong after market following. Likewise, many tC owners have gone to great lengths modding their car. to say it isn't a tuner car would be flagrantly wrong.

I suppose what I mean is that despite this following it is far from being an optimal performance vehicle. especially one that would compete with the FR-S for market share.

the 2AR-FE engine is indeed extremely reliable and has posted some surprising numbers with mods since it is such a strong engine. but a performance engine it is not. remember this is a motor that was first engineered for and used in the Rav-4 and Camry.

More importantly, there is weight. The tC is portly and worse yet that weight is distributed poorly. The glass top and excessive body roll don't help either.

Can the tC become fast? Absolutely. Does it take comparatively more money/time/mods than other coupes in the same price range? Yes.

I fixed that first issue. Disagree with the second part of it taking more money/time/mods than other coupes. What are you comparing it to when you say takes more money/time/mods to be faster or as fast? Motor is not "designated" as a performance motor, but it holds it's own with performance motors.
Dragonitti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 12:49 PM   #30
Kids Heart
Senior Member
 
Kids Heart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited SWP
Location: Lawrenceville GA
Posts: 583
Thanks: 64
Thanked 123 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The FR-S makes the TC even more relevant. Expect a sedan in the near future.
Kids Heart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 02:05 PM   #31
Sabastian
will rain on your parade.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2007 Mini Cooper, 1996 Mazda MX-5
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 136
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti View Post
I fixed that first issue. Disagree with the second part of it taking more money/time/mods than other coupes. What are you comparing it to when you say takes more money/time/mods to be faster or as fast? Motor is not "designated" as a performance motor, but it holds it's own with performance motors.
I would probably compare it to something that already has forced induction from the factory. A simple chip in a GTI, for instance, will increase power dramatically. Or perhaps something with a more aggressive suspension setup from the factory? The tC may be sporty-ish, but I don't think I've ever seen one being compared with members of the hot-hatch set (MS3, GTI, etc). And are you implying that you "fixed" the top-heaviness by removing the glass roof? I doubt that was cheap.

That said, you obviously dumped a lot of money into modifying your tC, so nothing I say is going to make you think, "Yeah, I guess I could have a chosen a better platform to begin with." We'll all be driving FR-S's and BRZ's soon anyway, so it's not like it'll matter .
Sabastian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 02:26 PM   #32
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I don't give a damn about backseat space but I would miss a liftback hatch though. Thats the only upside a Tc has over a FR-S in my perspective. I can't think of another benefit after that.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 02:33 PM   #33
WolfpackS2k
Senior Member
 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,215
Thanks: 2,951
Thanked 2,082 Times in 1,193 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
In regards to scion, which many consider to be unsuccessful, is anything but. Everyone remember Oldsmobile? They use to be a relevant car manufacturer until they woke up one morning and there average customer was 65… 7 years ago Toyota was in a similar position, they had affordable reliable cars, but one of the oldest average buyer ages (40). Their solution to this was to attract younger buyers to Toyota dealerships via unconventional marketing and youth oriented vehicles. They also needed to do this without negatively affecting Toyota’s brand image.


Enter Scion, more of a marketing arm than a new brand, they exist in the corner of Toyota dealerships have advertising and vehicles that appeal to younger buyers, sold cars in a non conventional manner (Scion Pure Pricing) and used mono-spec offerings to keep cost down while using dealer installed accessories as a primary source of dealer income.


Make no mistake, Scion is not Lexus, they are not intended to be a self sufficient brand distinct and separate from Toyota. It is a gateway product meant to maintain Toyotas relevance among younger buyers. As well as an advertising department that can have edgy and unconventional methods without alienating Toyotas current customer base.
So you're saying that Toyota wanted to improve their brand image and bring in younger customers by...creating another brand that a lot of people don't even realize is Toyota?! Seems like pretty dumb logic to me. I'd also like to bring up the fact that when Scion was created they pledged to never sell one model longer than one generation, i.e. single run models. That lasted...almost no time at all.

Toyota needs to kill off Scion and rebadge those cars back to Toyotas as they rightfully should be. Toyota has a lot of sporting heritage that goes back over 40 years, something that Scion will never have.

I think their marketing people are a bunch of idiots
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R
WolfpackS2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 02:49 PM   #34
TheMachine
Scion Sales Manager
 
TheMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2011 Scion tC
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
So you're saying that Toyota wanted to improve their brand image and bring in younger customers by...creating another brand that a lot of people don't even realize is Toyota?! Seems like pretty dumb logic to me. I'd also like to bring up the fact that when Scion was created they pledged to never sell one model longer than one generation, i.e. single run models. That lasted...almost no time at all.

Toyota needs to kill off Scion and rebadge those cars back to Toyotas as they rightfully should be. Toyota has a lot of sporting heritage that goes back over 40 years, something that Scion will never have.

I think their marketing people are a bunch of idiots

You should do some more research on Scion and the Racing division...
__________________
TheMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 02:52 PM   #35
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
So you're saying that Toyota wanted to improve their brand image and bring in younger customers by...creating another brand that a lot of people don't even realize is Toyota?! Seems like pretty dumb logic to me. I'd also like to bring up the fact that when Scion was created they pledged to never sell one model longer than one generation, i.e. single run models. That lasted...almost no time at all.

Toyota needs to kill off Scion and rebadge those cars back to Toyotas as they rightfully should be. Toyota has a lot of sporting heritage that goes back over 40 years, something that Scion will never have.

I think their marketing people are a bunch of idiots
Jack Hollis looks too old to be representing Scion and FR-S. #irony
And when he tries to act young I die a little. #cringe
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 02:53 PM   #36
Dillano609
Teh O1d 5oul
 
Dillano609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 97' Nissan Maxima SE, 04' BMW 330ci
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMachine View Post
You should do some more research on Scion and the Racing division...
__________________
Proud owner of a 2004 BMW 330ci 6-speed
Dillano609 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 03:02 PM   #37
Dragonitti
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Drives: Boosted Scion tC, 350z
Location: TN
Posts: 1,779
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabastian View Post
I would probably compare it to something that already has forced induction from the factory. A simple chip in a GTI, for instance, will increase power dramatically. Or perhaps something with a more aggressive suspension setup from the factory? The tC may be sporty-ish, but I don't think I've ever seen one being compared with members of the hot-hatch set (MS3, GTI, etc). And are you implying that you "fixed" the top-heaviness by removing the glass roof? I doubt that was cheap.

That said, you obviously dumped a lot of money into modifying your tC, so nothing I say is going to make you think, "Yeah, I guess I could have a chosen a better platform to begin with." We'll all be driving FR-S's and BRZ's soon anyway, so it's not like it'll matter .

A Chipped GTI is not fast, it would still lose to a bolted on turbo kitted tC. A simple bolt-on turbo setup on a tC is faster than an MS3 or GTI. The price of the MS3 and GTI would be matched by a tC + turbo setup and be faster than both.

Carbon roof for the tC is $500. Install it yourself = free labor. Mine still has the glass but it's lighter everywhere else. I just haven't gotten around to replacing the roof yet.

Mine is a little irrelevant now and can't be compared to those other cars presently, but before I went down this path, it use to be just a straight bolted on turbo kit and that was it. Still was faster than even a modded MS3 or chipped GTI.


Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
So you're saying that Toyota wanted to improve their brand image and bring in younger customers by...creating another brand that a lot of people don't even realize is Toyota?! Seems like pretty dumb logic to me. I'd also like to bring up the fact that when Scion was created they pledged to never sell one model longer than one generation, i.e. single run models. That lasted...almost no time at all.

Toyota needs to kill off Scion and rebadge those cars back to Toyotas as they rightfully should be. Toyota has a lot of sporting heritage that goes back over 40 years, something that Scion will never have.

I think their marketing people are a bunch of idiots
The revenue would go back to Toyota either way, so don't think that really matters that much.
Dragonitti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:02 PM   #38
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
What racing heritage does Scion possess? The RWD Tc drift car? I don't think that counts if that is what you're talking about.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:08 PM   #39
MiguelAE86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: NB Miata
Location: Florida
Posts: 775
Thanks: 425
Thanked 120 Times in 58 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
No. It's not.

Although, i'll admit, it's Scion's bread and butter, so in a way we owe some respect to the tC
MiguelAE86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:12 PM   #40
Dragonitti
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Drives: Boosted Scion tC, 350z
Location: TN
Posts: 1,779
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 View Post
What racing heritage does Scion possess? The RWD Tc drift car? I don't think that counts if that is what you're talking about.

Love how the drift tC's are the only one's anyone ever think about. Which proves my point I made in the other thread regarding their approach to racing.


Hmm...Let's see..

Instead of giving you a Loooong list of stuff, I'll just send the links

Drag, Drift, Road Racing/Time Attack and Rally

http://www.scion.com/scionracing/index.html


World Racing's accomplishment link (out dated though since they re-broke ever record so far with their new 2012 tC 2.0)

http://www.world-racing.com/vehicles.htm



PTuning - Independent shop and not backed by Toyota (2008-2009) FWD Modified Time Attack champs

http://www.ptuningscion.com/subdir/ta_sciontc.cfm
Dragonitti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:18 PM   #41
random
Senior Member
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Multiple
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
So you're saying that Toyota wanted to improve their brand image and bring in younger customers by...creating another brand that a lot of people don't even realize is Toyota?! Seems like pretty dumb logic to me.
You should take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scion_(automobile)
"Scion is a brand of vehicles produced by Toyota Motor Corporation for the North American market. Founded in 2002, Scion's long-term goal is to appeal to Generation Y consumers."
random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2011, 04:21 PM   #42
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Regardless of which racing series you are talking about, Scion does NOT have racing HERITAGE. Not yet anyways.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
price


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.