follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-26-2015, 11:19 PM   #15
OkieSnuffBox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: '23 BRZ Limited
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 2,089
Thanks: 683
Thanked 1,337 Times in 761 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
*slow clap*
OkieSnuffBox is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to OkieSnuffBox For This Useful Post:
Calum (11-18-2015), Dimman (08-28-2015), drewbot (08-31-2015), Hyper4mance2k (08-27-2015), WhiteFRS69 (08-27-2015)
Old 08-26-2015, 11:47 PM   #16
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,335
Thanks: 698
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
LW pulleys & FW do not add power, but acceleration with them is faster, which is often subjectively associated with having more power. That's about it, don't get why there is any need to do any poll on what share of drivers believes what. It won't change much how many will or won't decide if it's worthy purchase/upgrade.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2015, 12:50 AM   #17
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 896 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarb View Post
Pretends to make a technical topic. Becomes an advertisement.
I don't recall ever seeing any other type of post from them.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post:
Dimman (08-28-2015), Hyper4mance2k (08-27-2015)
Old 08-27-2015, 02:09 AM   #18
Turdinator
Señor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 769 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Yes, they do
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
No, they don't
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Yes they do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
No! They don't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Technical blah blah blah, you can't prove shit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Yes, I can. More technical blah blah blah.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Lets agree to disagree, it's my car I'll do what I want.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Sure, you're still an idiot though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
....
This was wild from start to finish.
10/10 would read again.
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Turdinator For This Useful Post:
ATL BRZ (08-28-2015), Aztec (08-27-2015), calmtigers (08-27-2015), Calum (08-27-2015), Cartman (08-29-2015), CSG Mike (08-27-2015), Dimman (08-28-2015), drewbot (08-27-2015), meWant (08-28-2015), raven1231 (08-28-2015), Special_K (08-27-2015), tinma (08-27-2015), WhiteFRS69 (08-27-2015)
Old 08-27-2015, 10:26 AM   #19
wbradley
Sarcastic SOB
 
wbradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S M6, '23 Volvo V60 CC
Location: Thornhill Ontario
Posts: 4,643
Thanks: 1,362
Thanked 2,858 Times in 1,642 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Garage
Based on physics I'd say they don't increase HP, but might improve net or effective power, if that's the right term). By reducing moving mass in the drive train the engine can respond quicker to throttle input. In the end I believe the net result is same HP at same RPM on a dyno, but possibly a steeper curve on the graph reaching the same peak.

Just read the article. Under drive implies larger diameter pulleys, not necessarily lighter weight ones. As in putting less power to the water pump, alternator, etc in order to have more available to the flywheel. Possibly risky to the performance of the under driven components.

Sorry for adding click bait if this is an advertising ploy.
__________________
5:AD kit, HKS V1+ S/C, ECUtek dyno'd, Ohlins MP20, Magnaflow cb, Revworks UEL, Topspeed overpipe, Pinnacle Ceramic tint, VG shark fin, HID's, yellow DRL's, full LEDs, red floor lights, Homelink mirror, trunk lid liner, Perrin LWCP, Valenti smoked, Flossy Grip Tape Shorty, GT86 plaque, lighted vanity mirror, Michelin PSS, Project mU +800, DOT4 fluid, 720 Form GTF1 17x8&9, stitched leather bits, EZ valve.
wbradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2015, 10:33 AM   #20
OkieSnuffBox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: '23 BRZ Limited
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 2,089
Thanks: 683
Thanked 1,337 Times in 761 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
They reduce "parasitic loss."
OkieSnuffBox is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OkieSnuffBox For This Useful Post:
JDM4E (08-28-2015), phobos512 (08-27-2015)
Old 08-27-2015, 01:54 PM   #21
NonStopTuning
Senior Member
 
NonStopTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86
Location: CA TX USA
Posts: 385
Thanks: 168
Thanked 149 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The link in the original post includes a good amount of technical info, along with real world dyno testing information, and feedback from real world users. Anyone interested in reading real world info is welcomed to click the link and read, then search the blog for dyno testing with Subarus, Nissans, Toyotas, etc. etc.

Trolling and forum bashing is unnecessary and unproductive.

Thanks all.
NonStopTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2015, 11:15 PM   #22
Bergen23
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: '15 Halo FR-S
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,317
Thanks: 922
Thanked 950 Times in 492 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NonStopTuning View Post
The link in the original post includes a good amount of technical info, along with real world dyno testing information, and feedback from real world users. Anyone interested in reading real world info is welcomed to click the link and read, then search the blog for dyno testing with Subarus, Nissans, Toyotas, etc. etc.

Trolling and forum bashing is unnecessary and unproductive.

Thanks all.
Ok, so for our platform, I see a peak increase of less than 5 HP and less than 3 torques. And for a cost between 128 and 486 bucks, which is 168 and 640 canadian.

That's a hard price to swallow for such a small gain, especially when a 50 dollar air filter will give you that gain. Plus, there's no mention of how many dyno runs were made. Did the cars without the pulleys ever put up higher numbers than the cars that do have them? I feel like with such a small gain, there's some fudge factor here.

Not to mention the whole debate of whether or not LWP are possibly damaging to engines. Not trying to light that fire here, but simply because there's no clear cut answer, that's enough to keep me away from them.
Bergen23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bergen23 For This Useful Post:
rallysrt (08-30-2015), Tcoat (08-31-2015)
Old 08-28-2015, 07:23 AM   #23
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NonStopTuning View Post
The link in the original post includes a good amount of technical info, along with real world dyno testing information, and feedback from real world users. Anyone interested in reading real world info is welcomed to click the link and read, then search the blog for dyno testing with Subarus, Nissans, Toyotas, etc. etc.

Trolling and forum bashing is unnecessary and unproductive.

Thanks all.
Clickbait title. Zero actual content in the post, just a link.

Is this an actual contribution to the forum and/or a discussion?

I'll start a discussion.

What are the merits of the NST Pulley vs something like the Fluidampr?

http://www.fluidampr.com/product/571101/
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
fika84 (08-31-2015), Hyper4mance2k (08-29-2015), Tcoat (08-31-2015)
Old 08-28-2015, 09:17 AM   #24
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,335
Thanks: 698
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Merits? Hmm. - Extra bling, ligher weight.
Drawbacks - loss of dampening, which may affect bearings life if used together with lightened flywheel, from what i've heard on this topic, where people advised use LW CP - OR - LW FW, not both.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2015, 09:52 AM   #25
raven1231
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S, 2016 DGM WRX
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,580
Thanks: 8,264
Thanked 3,118 Times in 1,667 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergen23 View Post
Ok, so for our platform, I see a peak increase of less than 5 HP and less than 3 torques. And for a cost between 128 and 486 bucks, which is 168 and 640 canadian.

That's a hard price to swallow for such a small gain, especially when a 50 dollar air filter will give you that gain. Plus, there's no mention of how many dyno runs were made. Did the cars without the pulleys ever put up higher numbers than the cars that do have them? I feel like with such a small gain, there's some fudge factor here.

Not to mention the whole debate of whether or not LWP are possibly damaging to engines. Not trying to light that fire here, but simply because there's no clear cut answer, that's enough to keep me away from them.
DAT THROTTLE RESPONSE DOE! !! GAINZ!!!
raven1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to raven1231 For This Useful Post:
Bergen23 (08-28-2015), drewbot (08-28-2015), Tcoat (08-31-2015)
Old 08-28-2015, 10:52 AM   #26
empower-auto
Kouki-Monster
 
empower-auto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 1,137
Thanks: 11
Thanked 562 Times in 261 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
They look good but don't do anything worth mentioning performance wise.

Get a light flywheel.
__________________
Rich Anderson
EMPOWER AUTO
empower-auto is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to empower-auto For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (08-28-2015)
Old 08-28-2015, 08:33 PM   #27
why?
Only happy when it rains.
 
why?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: series.blue
Location: Harnett county NC
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 5,698
Thanked 1,265 Times in 750 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Clickbait title. Zero actual content in the post, just a link.

Is this an actual contribution to the forum and/or a discussion?

I'll start a discussion.

What are the merits of the NST Pulley vs something like the Fluidampr?

http://www.fluidampr.com/product/571101/
If you think one isn't worth much then the other isn't either.

As someone who has had a 3 piece NST pulley kit, a lightweight flywheel and super light weight wheels on my Yaris for over 5 years, the change is dramatic in how fast the car revs, and because I am a gas mileage freak I get better gas mileage as well.

Now could a boxer be different? Of course, but if the stock engine can take all sorts of forced induction, then a pulley kit is not a big deal. I will say the NST pulleys are much more expensive than what is stock, and that is the main reason they would never do something like that oem.
why? is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to why? For This Useful Post:
NonStopTuning (08-29-2015)
Old 08-28-2015, 09:04 PM   #28
olsonpg
Senior Member
 
olsonpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: BRZ. R34 GT-T
Location: Calgary
Posts: 762
Thanks: 737
Thanked 613 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Shouldn't posts like this be in the commercial classifieds as its obviously a big fat add from our blonde haired friend at NST.
olsonpg is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GrimmSpeed Lightweight Crank Pulleys! RallySport Direct Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 9 01-27-2015 01:02 PM
Lightweight Pulleys in Turbo application GH05T Forced Induction 8 12-05-2014 05:21 AM
FS: GFB style lightweight pulleys. dj petey Canada Classifieds 8 05-08-2014 10:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.