follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-12-2013, 01:48 PM   #1
shu5892001
Ontario's FT86
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2016 Lexus GS-F
Location: Toronto
Posts: 685
Thanks: 261
Thanked 165 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Bigger front pipe to smaller diameter cat-back, bad idea?

Hi,

I am currently running 2.5 inch un-resonated perrin cbe. I was wondering if I can pair it up with 2.75 inch over pipe and front pipe.

Would this work?

Are there any disadvantage?

Thanks!
shu5892001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 02:56 PM   #2
shu5892001
Ontario's FT86
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2016 Lexus GS-F
Location: Toronto
Posts: 685
Thanks: 261
Thanked 165 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
anyone?
shu5892001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 03:20 PM   #3
BuBlake
Chronic Flashturbator
 
BuBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '13 Scion FR-S MT
Location: Texas
Posts: 319
Thanks: 202
Thanked 98 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
The only disadvantage is that you'll be slightly more constricted on the cb. I believe that with NA, the main restriction is the mufflers themselves, not necessarily the pipe diameter; I don't think you'll see any difference at all unless you're going straight pipes with a turbo, but I'm no pro.
__________________
OFT Stg 2 UEL E85 - Borla UEL Header - Invidia Q300 - Invidia catless frontpipe - Fa20club CAI - Billet Power Blocks - Michelin PSS 245/35/18 all around on Motegi Racing SP10 18x8 +38 - Eibach Sportline springs - SPC LCA
BuBlake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 04:37 PM   #4
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
As the exhaust cools on its way through the exhaust it's volume decreases. I've often wondered why exhausts aren't designed to maintain a velocity, meaning a gradual decrease in tubing size, as opposed to maintaining just the tubing size. You MIGHT even be doing something good.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:03 PM   #5
shu5892001
Ontario's FT86
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2016 Lexus GS-F
Location: Toronto
Posts: 685
Thanks: 261
Thanked 165 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
As the exhaust cools on its way through the exhaust it's volume decreases. I've often wondered why exhausts aren't designed to maintain a velocity, meaning a gradual decrease in tubing size, as opposed to maintaining just the tubing size. You MIGHT even be doing something good.
shu5892001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:08 PM   #6
boredom.is.me
Custom User Title
 
boredom.is.me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Asphalt FR-S MT
Location: Buford, GA/Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 395
Thanked 1,182 Times in 697 Posts
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
As the exhaust cools on its way through the exhaust it's volume decreases. I've often wondered why exhausts aren't designed to maintain a velocity, meaning a gradual decrease in tubing size, as opposed to maintaining just the tubing size. You MIGHT even be doing something good.
Because cost - they would probably have to use seem welded tubes, which would take much longer and much more effort to produce.
__________________
boredom.is.me is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to boredom.is.me For This Useful Post:
Calum (04-12-2013)
Old 04-12-2013, 05:11 PM   #7
mrk1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Sterling BRZ Ltd
Location: New England
Posts: 1,702
Thanks: 403
Thanked 1,389 Times in 671 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
^^^ Agreed, you could step it or reduce it down but thats not all that gradual. A pipe that slightly tapers in diameter while following the windy path under the car sounds like a night mare to produce.

Good thinking though
__________________
The Build Thread

GT28RS - eBoost2 - 3.91 Final Drive - Supra LSD
mrk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:14 PM   #8
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrk1 View Post
^^^ Agreed, you could step it or reduce it down but thats not all that gradual. A pipe that slightly tapers in diameter while following the windy path under the car sounds like a night mare to produce.

Good thinking though
Well back to my thinking room.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:18 PM   #9
mrk1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Sterling BRZ Ltd
Location: New England
Posts: 1,702
Thanks: 403
Thanked 1,389 Times in 671 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Its not like your going to hurt anything. Ive been running a 2.5" over pipe and catless front section with the stock cat back for a few weeks. Nice and quiet
__________________
The Build Thread

GT28RS - eBoost2 - 3.91 Final Drive - Supra LSD
mrk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:20 PM   #10
boredom.is.me
Custom User Title
 
boredom.is.me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Asphalt FR-S MT
Location: Buford, GA/Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 395
Thanked 1,182 Times in 697 Posts
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
There is one option that may actually be cheaper to produce, but it would be a bit heavier. Stamped halves (top and bottom) would do the job. The initial costs would be much higher though as you would need molds to stamp with.
__________________
boredom.is.me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:21 PM   #11
boredom.is.me
Custom User Title
 
boredom.is.me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Asphalt FR-S MT
Location: Buford, GA/Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 395
Thanked 1,182 Times in 697 Posts
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Examples:

The exhaust headers as will as the front pipe have stamped covers I believe.
__________________
boredom.is.me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 08:11 PM   #12
86pro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: frs
Location: tdot
Posts: 149
Thanks: 13
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
you just will get more pick up but your back pressure and top end will be reduced. No big deal. If you were turbo then that would be close to fatal. The size difference isnt that much so not going notice it easily.
86pro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TRD Exhaust Pipe Diameter Jacob G. Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 24 04-10-2018 09:18 PM
Front Spring Diameter Captain Snooze Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 2 12-17-2012 01:06 PM
Exhaust Pipe Diameter fmsida Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 9 09-27-2012 05:46 PM
going significantly smaller idea Nepenthe Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 4 07-08-2012 09:48 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.