View Single Post
Old 02-04-2013, 01:48 PM   #51
rice_classic
Senior Member
 
rice_classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Nevermorange FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,176
Thanks: 758
Thanked 4,216 Times in 1,810 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bestwheelbase View Post
Did you, by chance, get a measurement of each? It is fairly common for a human to get better fuel economy than cruise (since you can anticipate hills/valleys, merging traffic, etc) but I am interested to see your numbers just for the sake of comparison.
I don't have back to back comparo data with "foot" vs "cruise". But I think the key here is *hills*. I was traveling from Seattle to Eastern WA and there's 3 big ranges to go over. What happened; I would fill up and be going along at 70+MPH getting 35+ (on the read out 35-38mpg) with my *foot* but then as soon as I put on cruise control the readout just started dropping: 36, 35, 34, 33, 32.. then level off. This was the same for the trip out and the trip back.

BTW: when I fill up and do the manual calculation my Avg MPG readout is consistently .7-1.3 mpg high compared to real world calculation. I always reset my avg mpg readout with every fillup. On a clear traffic time of the day I can drive from Everett to Puyallup (about 70 miles) and get 36-37mpg with my right foot doing 60-65mph.

Not the data you wanted to look but I hope this helps.
__________________
PRO86 | STL | LuckyDog
rice_classic is offline   Reply With Quote