Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkenBRZ
There is more than sufficient evidence to counter the claim that man is the cause
|
But this is science. Theories are debated, analyzed, debunked, accepted, refuted.
Your statement "There is more than sufficient evidence" is unreferenced hyperbole. I could counter with an equally pointless statement "there is more than enough evidence to support man made climate change".
You make a lot of broad generalizations which do not encompass the whole field.
Take this example:"There is also plenty of evidence that those calling out the doom and gloom of man made climate change are simply drumming up ‘business’ to pay for their bogus jobs".
I do not doubt for a moment that some unknown percentage of climate activists are padding their jobs but this can be said of any field. My good wife works in HR and the stories she tells me of some employees makes me cringe.
See my comment above about human fallibilities but you can't extrapolate to say all employees are padding their jobs.
Would you care to link some sites explaining why the theory of anthropomorphic climate change is wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkenBRZ
I am also networked with plenty of accomplished phd’d level individuals
|
I didn't doubt that for a moment.