Quote:
Originally Posted by 70NYD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deslock
Every car is a compromise and there is nothing wrong with wanting something fun and reasonably fuel efficient.
|
i dissagree with you here, you cant have something fun that is fuel efficient. if you think you can, name me one fun car (2 door rwd agile and reasonably fast) that is fuel efficient (<7L/100km)
|
I had written a reply to what you initially posted:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 70NYD
i dissagree with you here, you cant have something fun that is fuel efficient. if you think you can, name me 1 sports car that is fuel efficient (in recent years)
|
Here are three: MX5 (which regularly exceeds its MPG rating), MR2 Spyder, Elise.
But you rewrote your post so that if it doesn't attain 33.6 MPG, it's not considered fuel efficient. That's just silly. After getting 19-22 MPG in my WRX and 15-18 MPG in my RX8, I appreciate my MX5's 27-30 MPG (~75% spirited driving on hilly, rural roads; ~25% in-town; <1% highway).
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70NYD
also in regards to a prius, i am fairly sure that topgear did a prius at top speed around their track, followed by a M3 that matched the prius speed.. and the M3 was more fuel efficient.. so prius is only good while you grandma it.. after that it becomes a SUV (slow yet fuel guzzler)
|
That Topgear episode was amusing (as usual), but you've come to the wrong conclusion about its results.
All cars sucks down fuel when you race them. The M3, with its grippier tires, superior suspension/chassis, and much more powerful engine basically idled around the track keeping up with the Prius, which was being flogged on its thin high-MPG tires (if memory serves, both vehicles got approx 17 MPG in that test).
The Prius isn't any fun, but it gets 50+ MPG city and 45+ highway with normal driving, doubling or tripling most SUVs. Baby it and you do better. Race it and you do worse.