View Single Post
Old 08-24-2016, 08:42 PM   #135
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 896 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
After all this almost 300 km driving and doing a log 5 minutes before arriving at home, I get this:

http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-106-pull...7&zoom=223-331
+4 LTFT and AFR 11.27.
I don't know why it's compensating for the ports or directs so much, could be any number of things. Most likely is sitting in one specific cell somewhere for too long that skews the learning. Or that the PI is scaling horribly at high loads around 2000 rpm.

It's clear from this and an earlier log with enough miles on it though the difference is about 6.4%-6.6%.

http://datazap.me/u/tor/wayno-stg-1-...zoom=4040-5265

Instead of worrying so much about it, here's another solution. I'd run this as is but you can add whatever timing you want to it. The AFR will be around 11.8 and LTFT around 0.4 up to 7000 rpm where your power drops off on stock header anyway. The lack of PI at 2000 rpm might take away the ECU's ability to learn those high LTFT values above 5k/7k, but if it doesn't this will let you run correct AFR, regardless of the LTFT issue is resolved or not.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Stg1 100 v111.AU.Rich.DI A01G.zip (477.9 KB, 79 views)
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post:
Tor (08-26-2016)