These articles are based on a study from 2012 that is based on technology from 2008. Even worse, the study itself is mostly a meta-study, not doing any actual new research. It takes results and research from 100 sources and mixes it together. Assumptions layered upon assumptions layered upon assumptions. They don't all have to be false for the whole thing to fall apart. In the end, it all makes good news stories but terrible science.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFyre13th
|