Quote:
Originally Posted by JC1
I don't see it happening. From the Dec Fastrack...
#17835 BRZ-FRS Twins
Under the current wording of port installed options, the SAC cannot make an exception for the BRZ to install the TRD springs and bars.
If you make this exception to the rules you'd have a zillion letters coming in asking for similar "exceptions". "Me too, me too!!"
Jeff |
I just totally disagree with this. These are joint-venture cars, that are essentially the same car. What other can of worms could possibly be opened by allowing the BRZ to have the same mods as the FR-S? Why can't SCCA just make a clause that says all 'joint-venture' cars that share identical drivelines are on the same line for Street (and probably everything else)? What am I missing that would make this a bad thing? If the cars use the same driveline, what's the difference? I can see it causing issues for something like the new ND Miata, and the Fiat counter part, but those cars have different motors, not quite the same thing. I just think SCCA is royally screwing this up if the FR-S and BRZ are not in the same street classes with similar prep allowed.