View Single Post
Old 11-23-2015, 07:05 PM   #323
aaguirre123
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: sti 2012 sedan
Location: los angeles
Posts: 87
Thanks: 37
Thanked 26 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Speed View Post
no that was rwhp in my build. You are bench racing. Math and reality are not necessarily the same thing, and a manufactuer is more likely to inflate numbers for marketing, advertising and sales. Also Turbo potential hp figures vs N/A number potential is not equal.
I am just quoting what Crawford was stating that the FA20 yields more HP than an EJ on the same turbo. Because of this I am concluding that a NA FA20 will yield more HP than an NA EJ. Granted percentage increase in HP will be different but FA20 will yield more HP nonetheless. Also I would like to add that Subaru used the FA20 engine because a NA EJ20 or EJ25 can not reach the desired goal of 200 crank hp on pump. May be if you modify the design of the EJ20/25; Longer stroke, higher compression piston, DI/PI fuel deliver and redesign the rods to achieve a higher reving motor.


But wait, Subaru did modify the EJ20/25 motor. It's called the normally aspirated high reving FA20 motor.
aaguirre123 is offline   Reply With Quote