View Single Post
Old 11-23-2015, 03:07 AM   #113
KoolBRZ
Senior Member
 
KoolBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: Silver 2013 BRZ Ltd Auto 45,000 mi
Location: Vancouver, WA.USA
Posts: 965
Thanks: 86
Thanked 452 Times in 278 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Have you got your xml edited now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thambu19 View Post
When you get a chance can you try something like this? At WOT I have gone 100% DI. This means you need to a degree or so more spark there to use the full potential. If you do not then it will feel sluggish compared to stock calibration.
Can you use the PI thresholds now? If not, cells below .35% and 5000 rpm will be the same as zero %. I also wonder if there are any PI multipliers in effect, because that would cause the cells with .703 to exceed .75 and then those cells are the same as 100%. However, I don't see how running your PI table will hurt.
Because of the way my AT trans shifts in response to throttle input, this is one table that should be different between MT and AT tunes. I'll try it with the thresholds bypassed over .5 load instead of 1.5, so that the cells below 5000 and .35% will have some effect. Then I will compare it to my other tunes and let you know.
Attached Images
 
__________________
If I say yes, will that make you think I understand?

Last edited by KoolBRZ; 11-23-2015 at 03:35 AM.
KoolBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote