View Single Post
Old 06-07-2015, 08:46 PM   #2480
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 896 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ztan View Post
I thought EL comp table was only used for closed loop operation. Data that Wayno is looking at is at WOT, therefore should be open loop, would be surprised if that is the factor here.

Wonder if this is caused by higher loads on the engine running through the torque converter at the start - you're getting erratic peak loads of >1.4 on the AT and 1.1-1.2 on the MT at the start of the pull -> ECU will be delivering fuel to hit that 1.4 target.

What are your engine load limiters A and B set at? My stock A01G limits below:
There's only a few tables defined that are different between my map and MT now, none of which seem relevant.

- Base Timing Idle Below Speed Threshold
- Overrun Fueling Cut Counter RPM Threshold
- Misfire Count MAP Threshold B
- Catalyst Warm Up Idle

Mine you can get here, sans my MAF scale, with @Td-d defs:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...3&d=1433678088

The AT would never let you pile that much load below 4000 rpm in auto mode and you'd have to be an imbecile to do it on MT too. So it's sort of operating outside it's parameters which would explain being rich between 3000 and 4000.

@Td-d 's definition files don't have memory addresses for those Engine Load Limiter tables, it only has the description for the table in the base section.

My A01G def doesn't have addresses for those tables either. How'd you get them?

This is where I got the definitions.
https://github.com/TD-D/SubaruDefs/t.../RomRaider/ecu

Here's what load/AFR looks like on 98 - rich but completely normal - which could possibly be due to not hitting the load limiter.

http://datazap.me/u/wayne/stg2-uel-9...om=16328-17164


There is the global load limit of 4g/s - raising that will likely make the top end not go super rich. Doesn't account for the weird graph shape, I suspect I'd need the A and B tables for that.
Attached Files
File Type: zip ZA1JA01I.zip (461.4 KB, 125 views)
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote